• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床实践研究数据链金标准中使用指征代码的存在情况:良性前列腺增生治疗评估

Presence of Codes for Indication for Use in Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum: An Assessment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Treatments.

作者信息

Persson Rebecca, Hagberg Katrina Wilcox, Vasilakis-Scaramozza Catherine, Yelland Eleanor, Williams Tim, Myles Puja, Jick Susan S

机构信息

Boston Collaborative Drug Surveillance Program, Lexington, MA, USA.

Clinical Practice Research Datalink, Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, London, UK.

出版信息

Clin Epidemiol. 2022 May 3;14:641-652. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S360843. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.2147/CLEP.S360843
PMID:35535332
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9078872/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Assessments of strengths and limitations of new data sources are critical for making decisions about suitability for specific research questions. For some studies, it is necessary to capture a drug's indication for use.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the presence of indications for prescription use in Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) Aurum (January 1988-June 2021) by describing the proportion of men in CPRD Aurum who had a recorded indication for use of prescriptions for 5-alpha reductase inhibitors (5-ARI), alpha blockers (AB), or tadalafil, which have multiple indications.

METHODS

From a random sample of 154 practices of CPRD Aurum data, we selected 85,597 male patients with a prescription for a 5-ARI, an AB, or tadalafil. Among these patients, we described presence of codes indicating whether the patient had benign prostatic hyperplasia, hypertension, erectile dysfunction, or alopecia using three indication definitions: narrow (specific diagnoses recorded within one year before and up to 90 days after the prescription), broad (specific diagnoses or supporting clinical codes in the time period described above), and widest (diagnoses or supporting codes recorded at any time before the prescription and up to 90 days after the prescription).

RESULTS

Using the narrow indication definition limited to diagnoses only, 39,861 (46.6%) patients' records contained an indication for use. The broad definitions, which additionally included supporting codes, captured indications for 62,912 (73.5%) patients and the widest definition, which additionally included supporting codes and all available data before the first prescription date, captured indications for 71,478 (83.5%) patients. Indications were present more often for prescriptions in 2005 and later (85.9%).

CONCLUSION

The findings of this assessment suggest that CPRD Aurum can be used for studies that require information on treatment indications for BPH and potentially for treatments of other chronic diseases managed in the primary care setting.

摘要

背景

评估新数据源的优势和局限性对于决定其是否适合特定研究问题至关重要。对于某些研究,有必要获取药物的使用指征。

目的

通过描述临床实践研究数据链(CPRD)金数据(1988年1月至2021年6月)中男性患者使用5α还原酶抑制剂(5-ARI)、α受体阻滞剂(AB)或他达拉非(有多种适应症)的处方记录中有使用指征的比例,评估CPRD金数据中处方使用指征的存在情况。

方法

从CPRD金数据的154个医疗机构的随机样本中,我们选择了85597名开具5-ARI、AB或他达拉非处方的男性患者。在这些患者中,我们使用三种指征定义描述了表明患者是否患有良性前列腺增生、高血压、勃起功能障碍或脱发的编码的存在情况:狭义(在处方前一年至处方后90天内记录的特定诊断)、广义(上述时间段内的特定诊断或支持性临床编码)和最广义(在处方前任何时间至处方后90天内记录的诊断或支持性编码)。

结果

使用仅限于诊断的狭义指征定义,39861名(46.6%)患者的记录包含使用指征。广义定义(额外包括支持性编码)涵盖了62912名(73.5%)患者的指征,最广义定义(额外包括支持性编码以及首次处方日期之前的所有可用数据)涵盖了71478名(83.5%)患者的指征。2005年及以后开具的处方中更常出现指征(85.9%)。

结论

本次评估结果表明,CPRD金数据可用于需要前列腺增生治疗指征信息以及可能用于基层医疗环境中管理的其他慢性病治疗研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5d3/9078872/f333ec48cb47/CLEP-14-641-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5d3/9078872/f333ec48cb47/CLEP-14-641-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5d3/9078872/f333ec48cb47/CLEP-14-641-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Presence of Codes for Indication for Use in Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum: An Assessment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Treatments.临床实践研究数据链金标准中使用指征代码的存在情况:良性前列腺增生治疗评估
Clin Epidemiol. 2022 May 3;14:641-652. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S360843. eCollection 2022.
2
Quality and Completeness of Myocardial Infarction Recording in Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum.临床实践研究数据链Aurum中心肌梗死记录的质量与完整性
Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Aug 24;13:745-753. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S319245. eCollection 2021.
3
Comparison of Rheumatoid Arthritis Information Recorded in UK CPRD Aurum and CPRD GOLD Databases (Companion Paper 3).英国CPRD Aurum和CPRD GOLD数据库中记录的类风湿性关节炎信息比较(配套论文3)。
Clin Epidemiol. 2023 Dec 16;15:1207-1218. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S434831. eCollection 2023.
4
CPRD Aurum database: Assessment of data quality and completeness of three important comorbidities.CPRD Aurum 数据库:三种重要合并症的数据质量和完整性评估。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2020 Nov;29(11):1456-1464. doi: 10.1002/pds.5135. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
5
Comparison of antibiotic prescribing records in two UK primary care electronic health record systems: cohort study using CPRD GOLD and CPRD Aurum databases.比较两个英国初级保健电子健康记录系统中的抗生素处方记录:使用 CPRD GOLD 和 CPRD Aurum 数据库的队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 22;10(6):e038767. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038767.
6
Presence of Breast Cancer Information Recorded in United Kingdom Primary Care Databases: Comparison of CPRD Aurum and CPRD GOLD (Companion Paper 1).英国初级医疗数据库中记录的乳腺癌信息情况:CPRD Aurum与CPRD GOLD的比较(配套论文1)
Clin Epidemiol. 2023 Dec 16;15:1183-1192. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S434795. eCollection 2023.
7
Correctness and Completeness of Breast Cancer Diagnoses Recorded in UK CPRD Aurum and CPRD GOLD Databases: Comparison to Hospital Episode Statistics and Cancer Registry (Companion Paper 2).英国CPRD Aurum和CPRD GOLD数据库中记录的乳腺癌诊断的准确性和完整性:与医院事件统计和癌症登记处的比较(配套论文2)
Clin Epidemiol. 2023 Dec 16;15:1193-1206. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S434829. eCollection 2023.
8
Incomplete capture of apremilast in Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum: An example of exposure misclassification of specialty treatments in United Kingdom general practice databases.在临床实践研究数据链金标准(Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum)中阿普司特的不完全记录:英国全科医疗数据库中专科治疗暴露错误分类的一个例子。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2024 Jan;33(1):e5707. doi: 10.1002/pds.5707. Epub 2023 Oct 2.
9
Quality of rheumatoid arthritis recording in United Kingdom Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum.英国临床实践研究数据链Aurum中类风湿性关节炎记录的质量。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2023 Jan;32(1):73-77. doi: 10.1002/pds.5551. Epub 2022 Oct 24.
10
Quality and completeness of diagnoses recorded in the new CPRD Aurum Database: evaluation of pulmonary embolism.新 CPRD Aurum 数据库中记录的诊断的质量和完整性:肺栓塞评估。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2020 Sep;29(9):1134-1140. doi: 10.1002/pds.4996. Epub 2020 Mar 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Use of the CPRD Aurum Database: Insights Gained from New Data Quality Assessments.CPRD奥鲁姆数据库的使用:从新的数据质量评估中获得的见解。
Clin Epidemiol. 2023 Dec 16;15:1219-1222. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S434832. eCollection 2023.
2
Correctness and Completeness of Breast Cancer Diagnoses Recorded in UK CPRD Aurum and CPRD GOLD Databases: Comparison to Hospital Episode Statistics and Cancer Registry (Companion Paper 2).英国CPRD Aurum和CPRD GOLD数据库中记录的乳腺癌诊断的准确性和完整性:与医院事件统计和癌症登记处的比较(配套论文2)
Clin Epidemiol. 2023 Dec 16;15:1193-1206. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S434829. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Quality and Completeness of Myocardial Infarction Recording in Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum.临床实践研究数据链Aurum中心肌梗死记录的质量与完整性
Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Aug 24;13:745-753. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S319245. eCollection 2021.
2
CPRD Aurum database: Assessment of data quality and completeness of three important comorbidities.CPRD Aurum 数据库:三种重要合并症的数据质量和完整性评估。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2020 Nov;29(11):1456-1464. doi: 10.1002/pds.5135. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
3
Quality and completeness of diagnoses recorded in the new CPRD Aurum Database: evaluation of pulmonary embolism.
新 CPRD Aurum 数据库中记录的诊断的质量和完整性:肺栓塞评估。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2020 Sep;29(9):1134-1140. doi: 10.1002/pds.4996. Epub 2020 Mar 28.
4
Data resource profile: Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) Aurum.数据资源简介:临床实践研究数据链(CPRD)奥鲁姆
Int J Epidemiol. 2019 Dec 1;48(6):1740-1740g. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyz034.
5
Spatial distribution of clinical computer systems in primary care in England in 2016 and implications for primary care electronic medical record databases: a cross-sectional population study.2016年英格兰初级医疗中临床计算机系统的空间分布及其对初级医疗电子病历数据库的影响:一项横断面人群研究
BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 28;8(2):e020738. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020738.
6
Data Resource Profile: Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD).数据资源简介:临床实践研究数据链(CPRD)
Int J Epidemiol. 2015 Jun;44(3):827-36. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyv098. Epub 2015 Jun 6.
7
Methods and dimensions of electronic health record data quality assessment: enabling reuse for clinical research.电子健康记录数据质量评估的方法和维度:为临床研究提供可重用性。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Jan 1;20(1):144-51. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000681. Epub 2012 Jun 25.
8
The impact of the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) on the recording of smoking targets in primary care medical records: cross-sectional analyses from The Health Improvement Network (THIN) database.质量和结果框架(QOF)对初级保健医疗记录中吸烟目标记录的影响:来自健康改善网络(THIN)数据库的横断面分析。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Jul 10;12:329. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-329.