Department of Medical Education, CHA University School of Medicine, Pocheon, Korea
Department of Medical Education, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2022;19:10. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2022.19.10. Epub 2022 May 10.
This study aimed to gather opinions from medical educators on the possibility of introducing an interview to the Korean Medical Licensing Examination (KMLE) to assess professional attributes. Specifically following topics were dealt with: the appropriate timing and tool to assess unprofessional conduct; the possiblity of prevention of unprofessional conduct by introducing an interview to the KMLE; and the possibility of implementation of an interview to the KMLE.
A cross-sectional study approach based on a survey questionnaire was adopted. We analyzed 104 pieces of news about doctors’ unprofessional conduct to determine the deficient professional attributes. We derived 24 items of unprofessional conduct and developed the questionnaire and surveyed 250 members of the Korean Society of Medical Education 2 times. Descriptive statistics, cross-tabulation analysis, and Fisher’s exact test were applied to the responses. The answers to the open-ended questions were analyzed using conventional content analysis.
In the survey, 49 members (19.6%) responded. Out of 49, 24 (49.5%) responded in the 2nd survey. To assess unprofessional conduct, there was no dominant timing among basic medical education (BME), KMLE, and continuing professional development (CPD). There was no overwhelming assessment tool among written examination, objective structured clinical examination, practice observation, and interview. Response rates of “impossible” (49.0%) and “possible” (42.9%) suggested an interview of the KMLE prevented unprofessional conduct. In terms of implementation, “impossible” (50.0%) was selected more often than “possible” (33.3%).
Professional attributes should be assessed by various tools over the period from BME to CPD. Hence, it may be impossible to introduce an interview to assess professional attributes to the KMLE, and a system is needed such as self-regulation by the professional body rather than licensing examination.
本研究旨在征求医学教育者对在韩国医师执照考试(KMLE)中引入面试以评估专业属性的可能性的意见。具体涉及以下主题:评估不专业行为的适当时机和工具;通过在 KMLE 中引入面试来预防不专业行为的可能性;以及在 KMLE 中实施面试的可能性。
采用基于问卷调查的横断面研究方法。我们分析了 104 篇有关医生不专业行为的新闻,以确定缺乏的专业属性。我们得出了 24 项不专业行为,并开发了问卷,对韩国医学教育学会的 250 名成员进行了两次调查。应用描述性统计、交叉表分析和 Fisher 精确检验对回答进行分析。对开放式问题的回答采用常规内容分析进行分析。
在调查中,有 49 名成员(19.6%)做出了回应。在这 49 人中,有 24 人(49.5%)在第二次调查中做出了回应。在评估不专业行为时,基础医学教育(BME)、KMLE 和继续专业发展(CPD)之间没有主导的时间。书面考试、客观结构化临床考试、实践观察和面试之间也没有压倒性的评估工具。“不可能”(49.0%)和“可能”(42.9%)的回答率表明 KMLE 面试可以防止不专业行为。在实施方面,“不可能”(50.0%)的选择频率高于“可能”(33.3%)。
专业属性应通过 BME 到 CPD 期间的各种工具进行评估。因此,在 KMLE 中引入面试评估专业属性可能是不可能的,需要建立一种系统,例如由专业机构进行自我监管,而不是通过许可考试。