Suppr超能文献

“折中态度”:探究肉食者、纯素食者和偶尔食肉者对食肉者与非食肉者的态度。

"Meating halfway": Exploring the attitudes of meat eaters, veg*ns, and occasional meat eaters toward those who eat meat and those who do not eat meat.

作者信息

Pabian Sara, Ouvrein Gaëlle, van Royen Kathleen, Folkvord Frans, Poels Karolien, Vandebosch Heidi, De Backer Charlotte

机构信息

Tilburg University.

University of Antwerp.

出版信息

J Soc Psychol. 2023 May 4;163(3):408-424. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2022.2074288. Epub 2022 May 10.

Abstract

Empirical studies have persistently reported negative attitudes of meat eaters toward vegetarians and vegans (vegns), but scant attention has been paid to vegns' attitudes toward meat eaters. We aimed to investigate the attitudes of meat eaters and vegns from both perspectives. In addition, we explored the attitudes of occasional meat eaters. We performed a cross-sectional study (Study 1) among meat eaters, vegns, and occasional meat eaters, as well as a content analysis of publicly available tweets (Study 2). Study 1 ( = 477, = 23.45, = 5.91) showed that the attitudes of vegns toward meat eaters are significantly more negative compared to the attitudes of meat eaters toward vegns, but both were lower than the midpoint on scales measuring negative attitudes toward the other. Study 2 showed that only a small portion (<1%) of tweets ( = 1,328) on meat eating or veg*nism contained signs of negative attitudes. The two studies provide little evidence of the existence of strong negative attitudes.

摘要

实证研究一直报告称肉食者对素食者和纯素食者(veg*ns)持负面态度,但很少有人关注纯素食者对肉食者的态度。我们旨在从这两个角度调查肉食者和纯素食者的态度。此外,我们还探究了偶尔食肉者的态度。我们对肉食者、纯素食者和偶尔食肉者进行了一项横断面研究(研究1),并对公开的推文进行了内容分析(研究2)。研究1(n = 477,M = 23.45,SD = 5.91)表明,与肉食者对纯素食者的态度相比,纯素食者对肉食者的态度明显更负面,但两者都低于衡量对另一方负面态度量表的中点。研究2表明,关于肉食或纯素食主义的推文中(n = 1328),只有一小部分(<1%)含有负面态度的迹象。这两项研究几乎没有证据表明存在强烈的负面态度。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验