Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.
Plant Science Research, USDA-ARS SEA, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.
Genetics. 2022 Jul 4;221(3). doi: 10.1093/genetics/iyac076.
Wheat (Triticum aestivum) yield is impacted by a diversity of developmental processes which interact with the environment during plant growth. This complex genetic architecture complicates identifying quantitative trait loci that can be used to improve yield. Trait data collected on individual processes or components of yield have simpler genetic bases and can be used to model how quantitative trait loci generate yield variation. The objectives of this experiment were to identify quantitative trait loci affecting spike yield, evaluate how their effects on spike yield proceed from effects on component phenotypes, and to understand how the genetic basis of spike yield variation changes between environments. A 358 F5:6 recombinant inbred line population developed from the cross of LA-95135 and SS-MPV-57 was evaluated in 2 replications at 5 locations over the 2018 and 2019 seasons. The parents were 2 soft red winter wheat cultivars differing in flowering, plant height, and yield component characters. Data on yield components and plant growth were used to assemble a structural equation model to characterize the relationships between quantitative trait loci, yield components, and overall spike yield. The effects of major quantitative trait loci on spike yield varied by environment, and their effects on total spike yield were proportionally smaller than their effects on component traits. This typically resulted from contrasting effects on component traits, where an increase in traits associated with kernel number was generally associated with a decrease in traits related to kernel size. In all, the complete set of identified quantitative trait loci was sufficient to explain most of the spike yield variation observed within each environment. Still, the relative importance of individual quantitative trait loci varied dramatically. Path analysis based on coefficients estimated through structural equation model demonstrated that these variations in effects resulted from both different effects of quantitative trait loci on phenotypes and environment-by-environment differences in the effects of phenotypes on one another, providing a conceptual model for yield genotype-by-environment interactions in wheat.
小麦(Triticum aestivum)的产量受到多种发育过程的影响,这些过程在植物生长过程中与环境相互作用。这种复杂的遗传结构使得识别可以用来提高产量的数量性状位点变得复杂。对产量的单个过程或组成部分进行的性状数据具有更简单的遗传基础,可以用来模拟数量性状位点如何产生产量变化。本实验的目的是确定影响穗产量的数量性状位点,评估它们对穗产量的影响如何从对组成表型的影响中产生,以及了解穗产量变异的遗传基础在不同环境之间如何变化。从 LA-95135 和 SS-MPV-57 的杂交中开发的 358 F5:6 重组自交系群体在 2018 年和 2019 年的 2 个季节的 5 个地点进行了 2 次重复评估。亲本是 2 个在开花、株高和产量组成特征上不同的软红冬小麦品种。产量组成和植物生长数据用于组装结构方程模型,以描述数量性状位点、产量组成和整体穗产量之间的关系。主要数量性状位点对穗产量的影响因环境而异,它们对总穗产量的影响比例小于对组成性状的影响。这通常是由于组成性状的对比效应造成的,其中与籽粒数量相关的性状增加通常与与籽粒大小相关的性状减少有关。总之,所识别的全部数量性状位点足以解释每个环境中观察到的大部分穗产量变化。尽管如此,个别数量性状位点的相对重要性差异很大。基于结构方程模型估计的系数进行的路径分析表明,这些效应的变化是由于数量性状位点对表型的不同效应以及表型对彼此的环境间差异造成的,为小麦产量基因型-环境互作提供了一个概念模型。