• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人类通过绘画任务揭示的单次泛化。

One-shot generalization in humans revealed through a drawing task.

机构信息

Department of Experimental Psychology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.

Laboratory of Experimental Psychology, University of Leuven (KU Leuven), Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Elife. 2022 May 10;11:e75485. doi: 10.7554/eLife.75485.

DOI:10.7554/eLife.75485
PMID:35536739
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9090327/
Abstract

Humans have the amazing ability to learn new visual concepts from just a single exemplar. How we achieve this remains mysterious. State-of-the-art theories suggest observers rely on internal 'generative models', which not only describe observed objects, but can also synthesize novel variations. However, compelling evidence for generative models in human one-shot learning remains sparse. In most studies, participants merely compare candidate objects created by the experimenters, rather than generating their own ideas. Here, we overcame this key limitation by presenting participants with 2D 'Exemplar' shapes and asking them to draw their own 'Variations' belonging to the same class. The drawings reveal that participants inferred-and synthesized-genuine novel categories that were far more varied than mere copies. Yet, there was striking agreement between participants about which shape features were most distinctive, and these tended to be preserved in the drawn Variations. Indeed, swapping distinctive parts caused objects to swap apparent category. Our findings suggest that internal generative models are key to how humans generalize from single exemplars. When observers see a novel object for the first time, they identify its most distinctive features and infer a generative model of its shape, allowing them to mentally synthesize plausible variants.

摘要

人类具有从单个范例中学习新视觉概念的惊人能力。我们如何实现这一点仍然是个谜。最先进的理论表明,观察者依赖于内部的“生成模型”,这些模型不仅可以描述观察到的物体,还可以合成新颖的变体。然而,在人类单次学习中生成模型的有力证据仍然很少。在大多数研究中,参与者只是比较实验者创造的候选对象,而不是生成自己的想法。在这里,我们通过向参与者展示 2D“范例”形状并要求他们绘制自己属于同一类别的“变体”来克服这一关键限制。这些绘画揭示了参与者推断和综合出真正新颖的类别,这些类别比仅仅是复制的类别更加多样化。然而,参与者之间对于哪些形状特征最具区别性存在惊人的一致性,并且这些特征往往在绘制的变体中得以保留。事实上,交换特征部分会导致物体的类别发生变化。我们的研究结果表明,内部生成模型是人类如何从单个范例中进行泛化的关键。当观察者第一次看到一个新物体时,他们会识别出它最具特色的特征,并推断出它形状的生成模型,从而使他们能够在脑海中合成合理的变体。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a29/9090327/e0a8bcf49938/elife-75485-sa2-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a29/9090327/6a3b7497d95e/elife-75485-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a29/9090327/6320c07afb2e/elife-75485-fig1-figsupp1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a29/9090327/f97933ca3ba9/elife-75485-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a29/9090327/76b49016bf9c/elife-75485-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a29/9090327/9b3b10310268/elife-75485-fig3-figsupp1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a29/9090327/826d49f14722/elife-75485-fig3-figsupp2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a29/9090327/bdbff038df9c/elife-75485-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a29/9090327/6e90893bcc6c/elife-75485-fig4-figsupp1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a29/9090327/551678dd40df/elife-75485-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a29/9090327/9d16baff5f64/elife-75485-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a29/9090327/24dccf02537c/elife-75485-fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a29/9090327/e0a8bcf49938/elife-75485-sa2-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a29/9090327/6a3b7497d95e/elife-75485-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a29/9090327/6320c07afb2e/elife-75485-fig1-figsupp1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a29/9090327/f97933ca3ba9/elife-75485-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a29/9090327/76b49016bf9c/elife-75485-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a29/9090327/9b3b10310268/elife-75485-fig3-figsupp1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a29/9090327/826d49f14722/elife-75485-fig3-figsupp2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a29/9090327/bdbff038df9c/elife-75485-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a29/9090327/6e90893bcc6c/elife-75485-fig4-figsupp1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a29/9090327/551678dd40df/elife-75485-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a29/9090327/9d16baff5f64/elife-75485-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a29/9090327/24dccf02537c/elife-75485-fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a29/9090327/e0a8bcf49938/elife-75485-sa2-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
One-shot generalization in humans revealed through a drawing task.人类通过绘画任务揭示的单次泛化。
Elife. 2022 May 10;11:e75485. doi: 10.7554/eLife.75485.
2
One-shot categorization of novel object classes in humans.人类新物体类别的一次性分类。
Vision Res. 2019 Dec;165:98-108. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2019.09.005. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
3
Learn locally, think globally. Exemplar variability supports higher-order generalization and word learning.就地学习,放眼全球。范例变异性支持更高阶的泛化和词汇学习。
Psychol Sci. 2010 Dec;21(12):1894-902. doi: 10.1177/0956797610389189. Epub 2010 Nov 24.
4
Augmented semantic feature based generative network for generalized zero-shot learning.基于增强语义特征的生成网络用于广义零样本学习。
Neural Netw. 2021 Nov;143:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2021.04.014. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
5
Graded similarity in free categorization.自由分类中的等级相似性。
Cognition. 2019 Sep;190:1-19. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.04.009. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
6
Equal spacing and expanding schedules in children's categorization and generalization.儿童分类与概括中的等距和扩展时间表
J Exp Child Psychol. 2014 Jul;123:129-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2014.01.004. Epub 2014 Mar 7.
7
Generalization and similarity in exemplar models of categorization: insights from machine learning.分类范例模型中的泛化与相似性:来自机器学习的见解
Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Apr;15(2):256-71. doi: 10.3758/pbr.15.2.256.
8
Perception of an object's global shape is best described by a model of skeletal structure in human infants.人类婴儿的骨骼结构模型最能描述对物体整体形状的感知。
Elife. 2022 May 25;11:e74943. doi: 10.7554/eLife.74943.
9
Separability of abstract-category and specific-exemplar visual object subsystems: evidence from fMRI pattern analysis.抽象类别与具体范例视觉对象子系统的可分离性:来自功能磁共振成像模式分析的证据。
Brain Cogn. 2015 Feb;93:54-63. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2014.11.007. Epub 2014 Dec 18.
10
A dataset for evaluating one-shot categorization of novel object classes.一个用于评估新型对象类别的一次性分类的数据集。
Data Brief. 2020 Feb 21;29:105302. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2020.105302. eCollection 2020 Apr.

引用本文的文献

1
Characterizing internal models of the visual environment.表征视觉环境的内部模型。
Proc Biol Sci. 2025 Aug;292(2053):20250602. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2025.0602. Epub 2025 Aug 20.
2
Multiple timescales of context influence perceptual sensitivity to common pairings of musical pitch and timbre.上下文的多个时间尺度会影响对音高和音色常见组合的感知敏感性。
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 18;20(7):e0328490. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328490. eCollection 2025.
3
Human shape perception spontaneously discovers the biological origin of novel, but natural, stimuli.

本文引用的文献

1
Where to draw the line?划在哪里?
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 8;16(11):e0258376. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258376. eCollection 2021.
2
An image-computable model of human visual shape similarity.人类视觉形状相似度的图像可计算模型。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 Jun 1;17(6):e1008981. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008981. eCollection 2021 Jun.
3
Constant curvature segments as building blocks of 2D shape representation.常曲率线段作为二维形状表示的构建块。
人类形状感知能自发地发现新颖但自然的刺激的生物学起源。
J R Soc Interface. 2025 May;22(226):20240931. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2024.0931. Epub 2025 May 21.
4
Core dimensions of human material perception.人类物质感知的核心维度。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Mar 11;122(10):e2417202122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2417202122. Epub 2025 Mar 5.
5
Drawing as a versatile cognitive tool.绘画作为一种多功能的认知工具。
Nat Rev Psychol. 2023 Sep;2(9):556-568. doi: 10.1038/s44159-023-00212-w. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
6
How does the primate brain combine generative and discriminative computations in vision?灵长类动物的大脑如何在视觉中结合生成性计算和判别性计算?
ArXiv. 2024 Jan 11:arXiv:2401.06005v1.
7
Inferring shape transformations in a drawing task.推断绘图任务中的形状变换。
Mem Cognit. 2025 Jan;53(1):189-199. doi: 10.3758/s13421-023-01452-0. Epub 2023 Sep 5.
8
Jackdaws form categorical prototypes based on experience with category exemplars.寒鸦基于类别范例的经验形成范畴原型。
Brain Struct Funct. 2024 Apr;229(3):593-608. doi: 10.1007/s00429-023-02651-w. Epub 2023 Jun 1.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2021 Aug;150(8):1556-1580. doi: 10.1037/xge0001007. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
4
Learning the generative principles of a symbol system from limited examples.从有限的例子中学习符号系统的生成原理。
Cognition. 2020 Jul;200:104243. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104243. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
5
Relating Visual Production and Recognition of Objects in Human Visual Cortex.人类视觉皮层中物体的视觉产生与识别的关系。
J Neurosci. 2020 Feb 19;40(8):1710-1721. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1843-19.2019. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
6
One-shot categorization of novel object classes in humans.人类新物体类别的一次性分类。
Vision Res. 2019 Dec;165:98-108. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2019.09.005. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
7
Visual perception of shape-transforming processes: 'Shape Scission'.形状变换过程的视觉感知:“形状分裂”。
Cognition. 2019 Aug;189:167-180. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.04.006. Epub 2019 Apr 12.
8
Getting "fumpered": Classifying objects by what has been done to them.被“搞砸”:根据对物体所做的事情对其进行分类。
J Vis. 2019 Apr 1;19(4):15. doi: 10.1167/19.4.15.
9
Shape discrimination along morph-spaces.沿形态空间的形状辨别
Vision Res. 2019 May;158:189-199. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2019.03.002. Epub 2019 Mar 22.
10
Drawings of real-world scenes during free recall reveal detailed object and spatial information in memory.自由回忆过程中对真实场景的绘制揭示了记忆中详细的物体和空间信息。
Nat Commun. 2019 Jan 2;10(1):5. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07830-6.