Department of Orthopaedics & Rehabilitation Robert T. Stafford Hall, University of Vermont Medical Center, 4th Floor, 95 Carrigan Drive, Burlington, VT 05405, USA; The Robert Larner, M.D. College of Medicine at The University of Vermont Given Medical Building, E-126, 89 Beaumont Ave, Burlington, VT 05405, USA.
Department of Orthopaedics & Rehabilitation Robert T. Stafford Hall, University of Vermont Medical Center, 4th Floor, 95 Carrigan Drive, Burlington, VT 05405, USA; Department of Anesthesiology, University of Vermont Medical Center, West Pavilion Level 2, 111 Colchester Ave, Burlington, VT 05401, USA.
Spine J. 2022 Oct;22(10):1622-1627. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.04.021. Epub 2022 May 7.
Previous studies have reported that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) do not predict response to facet blocks. However, single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) uptake within facet joints has been shown to correlate with pain relief after intervention in the lumbar spine. There is minimal data regarding the predictive value of single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) for neck pain.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of SPECT/CT in patients with axial neck pain for the identification of specific facet joints that would benefit from diagnostic and therapeutic facet joint steroid injections and/or medial branch block/RFA treatments.
A retrospective cohort study.
One hundred seventy-nine patients at a single institution pain center with neck pain and a SPECT/CT scan between 2009 and 2015. One hundred twelve patients had no prior intervention at the level of interest and met inclusion criteria.
Pain reduction at 50% and 80% thresholds within 24 hours of facet intervention. Concordance of facet intervention with the focus of maximal uptake on SPECT/CT scan.
All patients were referred to our institution's Center for Pain Medicine and were treated with facet interventions. The site of facet intervention was determined by pain center providers based on their clinical examination and interpretation of images. Groups were formed based on whether the facet intervention included the level of maximal uptake on SPECT/CT scan. A positive response to intervention was defined at both 50% and 80% thresholds for reduction in pain within 24 hours of facet injection with steroid and local anesthetic or medial branch block with local anesthetic only. These were the facet interventions used for our data collection. A Chi-square statistic was used to analyze categorical data and a Student's t-test was used to analyze non-categorical data. SPSS (IBM Corp. IBM SPSS Version 24.0) was used for all analyses.
Of our 112 patients, Group 1 consisted of 89 with an intervention occurring at the level with increased uptake on SPECT/CT. Group 2 consisted of 23 patients with an intervention at a level without uptake on SPECT/CT. Demographic data did not significantly differ between cohorts. A Chi-square test of independence demonstrated that intervention at a level concordant with SPECT/CT was significantly correlated with self-reported pain relief thresholds of both 50% and 80% (p=.0002).
Facet interventions based on SPECT/CT scan uptake were more successful in pain reduction than those which were not. This suggests a role for SPECT/CT in diagnosing therapeutic targets for neck pain.
先前的研究表明磁共振成像(MRI)和计算机断层扫描(CT)不能预测关节突关节阻滞的反应。然而,在腰椎介入治疗后,关节突关节内的单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)摄取与疼痛缓解相关。关于 SPECT/CT 对颈痛的预测价值的数据很少。
本研究旨在评估 SPECT/CT 在轴向颈痛患者中的应用,以确定特定的关节突关节,这些关节突关节将从诊断和治疗关节突关节类固醇注射以及/或内侧支阻滞/RFA 治疗中获益。
回顾性队列研究。
一家单机构疼痛中心的 179 名颈痛患者,在 2009 年至 2015 年间进行 SPECT/CT 扫描。112 名患者在感兴趣的水平上没有进行过先前的干预,符合纳入标准。
关节突干预后 24 小时内 50%和 80%阈值的疼痛减轻程度。关节突干预与 SPECT/CT 扫描上最大摄取焦点的一致性。
所有患者均被转介至我们机构的疼痛医学中心,并接受了关节突干预。关节突干预的部位是由疼痛中心的提供者根据他们的临床检查和图像解释来确定的。根据 SPECT/CT 扫描上摄取量最大的水平,将患者分为两组。关节突内注射类固醇和局部麻醉或内侧支阻滞联合局部麻醉后 24 小时内疼痛减轻 50%和 80%被定义为有阳性反应。这些是我们数据收集所使用的关节突干预。卡方检验用于分析分类数据,学生 t 检验用于分析非分类数据。所有分析均使用 SPSS(IBM 公司 IBM SPSS 版本 24.0)。
在我们的 112 名患者中,第 1 组有 89 名患者在 SPECT/CT 显示摄取增加的水平上进行了干预。第 2 组有 23 名患者在 SPECT/CT 无摄取的水平上进行了干预。两组患者的人口统计学数据无显著差异。独立性卡方检验表明,与 SPECT/CT 一致的干预水平与 50%和 80%的自我报告疼痛缓解阈值显著相关(p=.0002)。
基于 SPECT/CT 扫描摄取的关节突干预在减轻疼痛方面比非摄取的关节突干预更成功。这表明 SPECT/CT 在诊断颈痛治疗靶点方面具有一定作用。