Scholten Paul, Sheikh Mateen, Atchison James, Eldrige Jason S, Garcia Diogo, Sandhu Sukhwinder, Qu Wenchun, Nottmeier Eric, Fox W Christopher, Buchanan Ian, Pirris Stephen, Chen Selby, Quinones-Hinojosa Alfredo, Abode-Iyamah Kingsley
Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA.
University of North Florida, 1 UNF Dr., Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA.
Interv Pain Med. 2024 Mar 3;3(1):100393. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2024.100393. eCollection 2024 Mar.
Cervical facet arthritis is a significant source of neck pain and impaired function that is amenable to treatment with medial branch radiofrequency neurotomy (RFN). Identifying appropriate patients for this treatment requires integration of information from the history, physical exam and diagnostic imaging, but the current diagnostic standard for facet-mediated pain is positive comparative medial branch blockade (MBB). SPECT-CT has recently been evaluated as a potential predictor of positive medial branch blocks with mixed results. The purpose of this retrospective analysis was to determine if a relationship exists between increased uptake on SPECT-CT of a given cervical facet joint and a positive MBB.
A retrospective review was performed to identify all patients undergoing cervical MBB within 12 months after having a cervical SPECT-CT. Each procedure was categorized as either Concordant (all facet joints demonstrating increased Tc uptake on SPECT-CT were blocked) or Discordant (at least one facet joint demonstrating increased Tc uptake on SPECT-CT was not blocked or block was performed in a patient that had no increased uptake on SPECT-CT). Statistical analysis was performed to determine if concordance between facet joints demonstrating increased uptake on SPECT-CT and those undergoing MBB was associated with a positive block using cutoffs of 50% and 80% pain relief.
A total of 43 procedures were analyzed (25% Concordant, 75% Discordant) and both groups demonstrated improvement in pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) scores. No significant association between concordance and positive MBB was identified at thresholds of 50% (p = .481) and 80% (p = 1.000) pain relief.
SPECT-CT findings do not accurately predict positive cervical MBB but may provide valuable information that can be considered with other factors when deciding which joints to treat.
颈椎小关节关节炎是颈部疼痛和功能受损的重要原因,可通过内侧支射频神经切断术(RFN)进行治疗。确定适合该治疗的患者需要整合病史、体格检查和诊断成像的信息,但目前小关节介导性疼痛的诊断标准是对比性内侧支阻滞(MBB)阳性。SPECT-CT最近被评估为内侧支阻滞阳性的潜在预测指标,结果不一。本回顾性分析的目的是确定给定颈椎小关节在SPECT-CT上摄取增加与MBB阳性之间是否存在关联。
进行回顾性研究,以确定在接受颈椎SPECT-CT后12个月内接受颈椎MBB的所有患者。每个手术被分类为一致(SPECT-CT上显示锝摄取增加的所有小关节均被阻滞)或不一致(SPECT-CT上显示锝摄取增加的至少一个小关节未被阻滞,或在SPECT-CT上摄取未增加的患者中进行了阻滞)。进行统计分析,以确定SPECT-CT上显示摄取增加的小关节与接受MBB的小关节之间的一致性是否与使用50%和80%疼痛缓解阈值的阳性阻滞相关。
共分析了43例手术(25%一致,75%不一致),两组的疼痛数字评定量表(NRS)评分均有改善。在50%(p = 0.481)和80%(p = 1.000)疼痛缓解阈值时,未发现一致性与MBB阳性之间存在显著关联。
SPECT-CT结果不能准确预测颈椎MBB阳性,但可能提供有价值的信息,在决定治疗哪些关节时可与其他因素一起考虑。