• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全球外科学、妇产科学、创伤学和麻醉学的相对引文比:对全球神经外科学的意义和启示。

Relative Citation Ratios of Global Surgery, Obstetrics, Trauma, and Anesthesia: Implications and Lessons for Global Neurosurgery.

机构信息

David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.

出版信息

World Neurosurg. 2022 Aug;164:e525-e529. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.05.003. Epub 2022 May 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2022.05.003
PMID:35537692
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The National Institutes of Health has developed a new metric, the Relative Citation Ratio (RCR), to assess the impact of research articles and compare academic productivity across different fields. Global surgery, obstetrics, trauma, and anesthesia (SOTA) are young and increasingly popular fields attracting researchers and funding. This study analyzed the RCR of global neurosurgery; compared it with other global SOTA specialties; and discussed the implications for researchers, academic institutions, and aspiring global neurosurgeons.

METHODS

Metadata were downloaded from the National Institutes of Health RCR website for 12 established global surgery specialties, including global neurosurgery. The authors performed descriptive and bivariable inferential analyses to evaluate differences in the number of total publications, median number of citations per year, and median RCR for each specialty for which data were available.

RESULTS

Global pediatric surgery had the highest median citations per year (2.00, interquartile range: 0.63-3.50; P = 0.048) and median relative citation ratio (1.36, interquartile range: 0.33-1.95; P = 0.693). In comparison, global neurosurgery articles had 0.20 median citations per year (IQR: 0-1.5) and 0.54 (IQR: 0.12-1.30) median relative citations. The median expected citations per year for all SOTA articles was 1.77.

CONCLUSIONS

We observed strong development of global neurosurgery and SOTA research. Overall, the use of the RCR will facilitate standardized interfield and intrafield academic productivity comparisons. Based on the results presented in this study, global neurosurgery is a promising career route for young and aspiring academic neurosurgeons.

摘要

背景

美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)开发了一种新的指标——相对引文比值(RCR),用于评估研究文章的影响力,并比较不同领域的学术产出。全球外科、妇产科、创伤和麻醉(SOTA)是年轻且日益受欢迎的领域,吸引着研究人员和资金。本研究分析了全球神经外科的 RCR;将其与其他全球 SOTA 专业进行比较;并讨论了对研究人员、学术机构和有抱负的全球神经外科医生的影响。

方法

从 NIH RCR 网站下载了 12 个已确立的全球外科专业(包括全球神经外科)的元数据。作者进行了描述性和双变量推断分析,以评估每个专业的总出版物数量、每年的中位数引文数和中位数 RCR 的差异。

结果

全球儿科外科的每年中位数引文数最高(2.00,四分位距:0.63-3.50;P=0.048)和中位数相对引文比(1.36,四分位距:0.33-1.95;P=0.693)。相比之下,全球神经外科文章每年的中位数引文数为 0.20(IQR:0-1.5)和中位数相对引文数为 0.54(IQR:0.12-1.30)。所有 SOTA 文章的预期每年中位数引文数为 1.77。

结论

我们观察到全球神经外科和 SOTA 研究的强劲发展。总体而言,RCR 的使用将促进标准化的领域间和领域内学术产出比较。基于本研究中的结果,全球神经外科是年轻且有抱负的学术神经外科医生的一个有前途的职业途径。

相似文献

1
Relative Citation Ratios of Global Surgery, Obstetrics, Trauma, and Anesthesia: Implications and Lessons for Global Neurosurgery.全球外科学、妇产科学、创伤学和麻醉学的相对引文比:对全球神经外科学的意义和启示。
World Neurosurg. 2022 Aug;164:e525-e529. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.05.003. Epub 2022 May 7.
2
Trends in Academic Spine Neurosurgeon Productivity as Measured by the Relative Citation Ratio.相对引文比衡量的学术脊柱神经外科医生生产力趋势。
World Neurosurg. 2021 Mar;147:e40-e46. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.11.097. Epub 2020 Nov 26.
3
Assessment of the NIH-supported relative citation ratio as a measure of research productivity among 1687 academic neurological surgeons.对国立卫生研究院支持的相对引用率作为1687名学术神经外科医生研究生产力衡量指标的评估。
J Neurosurg. 2020 Jan 31;134(2):638-645. doi: 10.3171/2019.11.JNS192679. Print 2021 Feb 1.
4
Evaluation of the National Institutes of Health-supported relative citation ratio among American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons fellowship faculty: a new bibliometric measure of scientific influence.评估美国肩肘外科医师学会研究员中美国国立卫生研究院支持的相对引文率:一种新的科学影响力的文献计量学指标。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022 Sep;31(9):e444-e450. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.03.017. Epub 2022 Apr 30.
5
Evaluating the research productivity of academic dermatologists based on the NIH-supported relative citation ratio.基于 NIH 支持的相对引文比评估学术皮肤科医生的研究生产力。
Arch Dermatol Res. 2023 Jul;315(5):1435-1438. doi: 10.1007/s00403-022-02485-2. Epub 2022 Nov 24.
6
Bibliometric Evaluation of U.S. Neurosurgery Subspecialties and Academic Rank Using RCR Index.使用 RCR 指数对美国神经外科学亚专业和学术排名进行文献计量评估。
World Neurosurg. 2022 Feb;158:e138-e147. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.10.148. Epub 2021 Oct 26.
7
Analyzing the Scholarly Impact of Cardiothoracic Surgery Research Using the Relative Citation Ratio.使用相对引用率分析心胸外科研究的学术影响力。
J Surg Res. 2022 Jul;275:265-272. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.02.007. Epub 2022 Mar 17.
8
Evaluation of Research Productivity among Academic Vitreoretinal Surgeons Using the Relative Citation Ratio.使用相对引文比评估学术玻璃体视网膜外科医生的研究生产力。
Ophthalmol Retina. 2023 Jun;7(6):509-515. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2023.01.002. Epub 2023 Jan 6.
9
Evaluation of the Relative Citation Ratio, a New National Institutes of Health-Supported Bibliometric Measure of Research Productivity, among Academic Radiation Oncologists.评估相对引文比,一种新的由美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)支持的、用于评估学术肿瘤放射科医生科研生产力的计量指标。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2018 Mar;15(3 Pt A):469-474. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.11.006. Epub 2018 Jan 2.
10
Evaluation of the Relative Citation Ratio Among Academic Orthopedic Hand Surgeons: A Novel Measure of Research Impact.评估骨科手部外科医生学术论文的相对被引率:一种衡量研究影响力的新方法。
Cureus. 2022 May 26;14(5):e25362. doi: 10.7759/cureus.25362. eCollection 2022 May.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of Different Doses of Dex Anesthesia on Inflammatory Factors and Hemodynamics in Patients Undergoing Neurosurgery and Its Relationship with RSS Score.不同剂量右美托咪定麻醉对神经外科手术患者炎症因子及血流动力学的影响及其与 RSS 评分的关系。
Biomed Res Int. 2022 Oct 5;2022:6447407. doi: 10.1155/2022/6447407. eCollection 2022.