• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

考察药剂学情感领域情境判断测验的有效性。

Examining Validity for the Pharmacy Affective Domain Situational Judgment Test.

机构信息

Manchester University, College of Pharmacy, Natural & Health Sciences, Fort Wayne, Indiana

State University of New York at Buffalo, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Buffalo, New York.

出版信息

Am J Pharm Educ. 2023 Apr;87(3):ajpe8932. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8932. Epub 2022 May 10.

DOI:10.5688/ajpe8932
PMID:35537741
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10159539/
Abstract

With the integration of the affective domain in the pharmacy accreditation standards, it is important for programs to have methods for formatively assessing student competency in these areas. The objective of this study was to examine the validity evidence for a recently developed situational judgment test to assess the affective domain contained in the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE) Standards 2016. After pilot testing items in multiple pharmacy schools, a revised 15-item situational judgment test instrument was developed measuring the affective domain as it relates to the pharmacy profession. The resulting Pharmacy Affective Domain Situational Judgment Test (PAD-S) was administered to students at three institutions and internal structure validity evidence was examined using item descriptives, Cronbach alpha, and results from a Rasch measurement model. There were 559 valid responses included in the study. The items were of varying difficulty, with Rasch results confirming the hierarchy of items and suggesting that items were contributing to the measure. The Cronbach alpha was 0.70, suggesting acceptable reliability. However, the reliability items from the Rasch model were lower (0.65 and 0.66), indicating that the ranking of ability was limited, which may be due to fewer items of high difficulty. Overall, the PAD-S performed well as a measure of the affective domain. The PAD-S may be a useful formative instrument as part of a comprehensive assessment plan and may be less resource intensive than other measures.

摘要

随着情感领域融入药学认证标准,对于项目来说,拥有形成性评估学生在这些领域能力的方法非常重要。本研究的目的是检验最近开发的一种情景判断测验在评估药学教育认证委员会(ACPE)标准 2016 中包含的情感领域的有效性证据。在多所药学院进行试点测试后,开发了一个经过修订的包含 15 个项目的情景判断测验工具,用于衡量与药学职业相关的情感领域。在三个机构中对学生进行了药房情感领域情景判断测验(PAD-S),并使用项目描述、克朗巴赫α和拉什测量模型的结果来检查内部结构有效性证据。研究共纳入 559 份有效回复。这些项目具有不同的难度,拉什结果证实了项目的层次结构,并表明项目对该测量具有贡献。克朗巴赫α为 0.70,表明可靠性可接受。然而,来自拉什模型的可靠性项目较低(0.65 和 0.66),表明能力排名有限,这可能是由于高难度项目较少。总体而言,PAD-S 在衡量情感领域方面表现良好。PAD-S 可能是综合评估计划的有用形成性工具,并且比其他测量工具资源密集度更低。

相似文献

1
Examining Validity for the Pharmacy Affective Domain Situational Judgment Test.考察药剂学情感领域情境判断测验的有效性。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2023 Apr;87(3):ajpe8932. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8932. Epub 2022 May 10.
2
A Situational Judgment Test to Assess Students' Achievement of Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education Standards 3 and 4.一项用于评估学生是否达到药学教育认证委员会标准3和标准4的情境判断测试。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2022 Feb;86(2):ajpe8511. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8511. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
3
Evaluation of a Situational Judgement Test to Develop Non-Academic Skills in Pharmacy Students.评估情景判断测试在培养药学学生非学术技能中的应用。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2019 Dec;83(10):7074. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7074.
4
Development and Validation of a Situational Judgement Test to Assess Professionalism.情境判断测验在评估专业精神中的开发与验证。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 Jul;84(7):ajpe7771. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7771.
5
A Five-Minute Situational Judgment Test to Assess Empathy in First-Year Student Pharmacists.用于评估大一药学生同理心的五分钟情境判断测验。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2019 Aug;83(6):6960. doi: 10.5688/ajpe6960.
6
Opening the Black Box: Agreement and Reliability of a Situational Judgment Test Across Multiple Institutions.打开黑箱:情境判断测验在多个机构中的一致性和可靠性。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2023 Nov;87(11):100129. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpe.2023.100129. Epub 2023 May 8.
7
Validity Evidence for a Pharmacists' Patient Care Process Self-Efficacy Scale Among Pharmacy Students.药剂学专业学生用药患关怀过程自我效能感量表的效度证据。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2021 Feb;85(2):8290. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8290. Epub 2020 Nov 13.
8
The Relationship Between a Multiple Mini-interview and Situational Judgment Test for Admissions.多站面试与情景判断测试在招生中的关系。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2023 Apr;87(3):ajpe9058. doi: 10.5688/ajpe9058. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
9
Validation of an empathy scale in pharmacy and nursing students.药学和护理专业学生同理心量表的验证。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2013 Jun 12;77(5):94. doi: 10.5688/ajpe77594.
10
Role of Knowledge and Experience in Situational Judgment Test Responses of Pharmacists and Pharmacy Students.药师和药学学生在情景判断测验反应中的知识和经验的作用。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2021 Jan;85(1):8194. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8194. Epub 2020 Oct 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Situational judgment test in pharmacy education: assessing professionalism capability among students.药学教育中的情境判断测试:评估学生的专业素养能力
BMC Res Notes. 2025 Mar 26;18(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s13104-025-07183-6.
2
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Performance Assessments: A Case Study of the Objective Structured Clinical Examination.成本效益分析在绩效评估中的应用:以客观结构化临床考试为例。
Med Educ Online. 2022 Dec;27(1):2136559. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2022.2136559.

本文引用的文献

1
A Situational Judgment Test to Assess Students' Achievement of Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education Standards 3 and 4.一项用于评估学生是否达到药学教育认证委员会标准3和标准4的情境判断测试。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2022 Feb;86(2):ajpe8511. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8511. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
2
Development and Validation of a Situational Judgement Test to Assess Professionalism.情境判断测验在评估专业精神中的开发与验证。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 Jul;84(7):ajpe7771. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7771.
3
Situational judgement test validity for selection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.情境判断测验在选拔中的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Med Educ. 2020 Oct;54(10):888-902. doi: 10.1111/medu.14201. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
4
Co-Curriculum Implementation and Assessment in Accredited Doctor of Pharmacy Programs.药学博士专业认证项目中课程的实施与评估。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 Mar;84(3):7569. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7569.
5
Evaluation of a Situational Judgement Test to Develop Non-Academic Skills in Pharmacy Students.评估情景判断测试在培养药学学生非学术技能中的应用。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2019 Dec;83(10):7074. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7074.
6
Teaching the affective domain in community-based medical education: A scoping review.基于社区的医学教育中情感领域的教学:一项范围综述。
Med Teach. 2020 May;42(5):507-514. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2019.1707175. Epub 2020 Jan 19.
7
A Five-Minute Situational Judgment Test to Assess Empathy in First-Year Student Pharmacists.用于评估大一药学生同理心的五分钟情境判断测验。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2019 Aug;83(6):6960. doi: 10.5688/ajpe6960.
8
Scoring method of a Situational Judgment Test: influence on internal consistency reliability, adverse impact and correlation with personality?情境判断测验的计分方法:对内部一致性信度、不利影响以及与人格的相关性有何影响?
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2017 May;22(2):243-265. doi: 10.1007/s10459-016-9720-7. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
9
Situational judgement tests in medical education and training: Research, theory and practice: AMEE Guide No. 100.医学教育与培训中的情境判断测试:研究、理论与实践:AMEE指南第100号
Med Teach. 2016;38(1):3-17. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2015.1072619. Epub 2015 Aug 27.
10
Educational testing and validity of conclusions in the scholarship of teaching and learning.教育测试与教学学术结论的有效性。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2013 Nov 12;77(9):186. doi: 10.5688/ajpe779186.