Tomii Daijiro, Okuno Taishi, Heg Dik, Pilgrim Thomas, Windecker Stephan
Department of Cardiology, Inselspital, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland.
CTU Bern, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland.
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2022 Apr;115(4):214-224. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2022.04.005. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
Previous studies provided conflicting data on the impact of new conduction abnormalities (CA), including new left bundle branch block (LBBB) and permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation, on patient outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).
To investigate the effect of new-onset CA after TAVI on long-term clinical outcomes and the impact of new CA depending on patient baseline profile.
Using data from a prospective TAVI registry (NCT01368250), patients without pre-existing LBBB or PPM were included in this study, and were stratified into three groups: no CA, new LBBB and new PPM after TAVI.
Among 2370 eligible patients, 1533 (64.7%) had no CA, 336 (14.2%) had new LBBB and 501 (21.1%) had new PPM after TAVI. At 5 years, patients with new LBBB had an increased risk of all-cause death (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.92; P=0.026), whereas patients with new PPM had a numerically increased risk of mortality (HR 1.26, 95% CI 0.99-1.60; P=0.065) compared to patients without CA. There was no significant difference in cardiovascular mortality between groups (HR for new LBBB 1.33, 95% CI 0.91-1.97; P=0.15; HR for new PPM 1.25, 95% CI 0.93-1.68; P=0.13]). The adverse effects of new CA were consistent across all subgroups except for the impact of new PPM stratified by balloon-expandable versus self-expanding or mechanically expanding valves (P=0.004).
New-onset LBBB after TAVI was associated with an increased risk of 5-year all-cause mortality, while new PPM implantation conferred a non-significant trend.
既往研究关于新出现的传导异常(CA),包括新出现的左束支传导阻滞(LBBB)和永久性起搏器(PPM)植入,对经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)后患者预后的影响提供了相互矛盾的数据。
研究TAVI后新发CA对长期临床结局的影响以及新发CA根据患者基线特征的影响。
使用来自前瞻性TAVI注册研究(NCT01368250)的数据,本研究纳入无既往LBBB或PPM的患者,并将其分为三组:无CA、TAVI后新发LBBB和新发PPM。
在2370例符合条件的患者中,1533例(64.7%)无CA,336例(14.2%)有新发LBBB,501例(21.1%)有新发PPM。在5年时,新发LBBB患者全因死亡风险增加(校正风险比[HR]1.41,95%置信区间[CI]1.04 - 1.92;P = 0.026),而与无CA患者相比,新发PPM患者死亡风险有数值上的增加(HR 1.26,95% CI 0.99 - 1.60;P = 0.065)。各组间心血管死亡率无显著差异(新发LBBB的HR 1.33,95% CI 0.91 - 1.97;P = 0.15;新发PPM的HR 1.25,95% CI 0.93 - 1.68;P = 0.13)。除了根据球囊扩张式与自膨胀式或机械扩张式瓣膜分层的新发PPM的影响外(P = 0.004),新发CA的不良影响在所有亚组中均一致。
TAVI后新发LBBB与5年全因死亡率风险增加相关,而新发PPM植入有不显著的趋势。