Lee Myung-Chul, Ahn Jungmin, Choi Ik Joon, Lee Byeong-Cheol, Ryu Junsun
Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Korea Cancer Center Hospital, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences (KIRAMS), Seoul, Korea.
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Center for Thyroid Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Aug;15(3):283-291. doi: 10.21053/ceo.2021.02285. Epub 2022 May 4.
This study aimed to present our experiences with various approaches for endoscopic thyroidectomy (ET) and to offer lessons for choosing an approach.
The medical records of 701 patients who underwent ET via the transaxillary (TA), bilateral axillo-breast (BABA), unilateral axillo-breast with carbon dioxide insufflation (UABA), retroauricular (RA), or transoral vestibular (TO) approach between May 2008 and March 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Postoperative pain and cosmetic outcomes were evaluated using visual analog scales.
The mean operative time of UABA was the shortest among the five approaches (TA, 194.65±51.13 minutes; BABA, 189.11±61.53 minutes; UABA, 118.62±30.23 minutes; RA, 168.22±45.63 minutes; TO, 196.10±40.19 minutes; P=0.02). BABA was the most painful approach, while TO was the least painful on postoperative day 1 (TA, 3.09±0.96; BABA, 3.59±0.92; UABA, 2.39±0.54; RA, 3.49±0.93; TO, 2.01±0.37; P=0.04) and day 3 (TA, 2.10±0.77; BABA, 2.59±0.88; UABA, 1.84±0.37; RA, 3.01±0.67; TO, 1.49±0.45; P=0.04). The TO group had the best cosmetic outcomes at 3 months (TA, 3.91±1.21; BABA, 4.52±1.13; UABA, 4.49±0.74; RA, 4.28±0.74; TO, 4.81±0.48; P=0.04).
We present a single-surgeon experience of five distinctive ET approaches and the lessons from each approach, together with a literature review. This data may aid endoscopic thyroid surgeons in choosing from various ET approaches.
本研究旨在介绍我们在内镜甲状腺切除术(ET)中采用各种方法的经验,并为选择手术方法提供经验教训。
回顾性分析2008年5月至2020年3月间701例行ET手术患者的病历,这些患者分别采用经腋窝(TA)、双侧腋窝-乳房(BABA)、单侧腋窝-乳房联合二氧化碳充气(UABA)、耳后(RA)或经口前庭(TO)入路。采用视觉模拟量表评估术后疼痛和美容效果。
UABA入路的平均手术时间在五种入路中最短(TA,194.65±51.13分钟;BABA,189.11±61.53分钟;UABA,118.62±30.23分钟;RA,168.22±45.63分钟;TO,196.10±40.19分钟;P = 0.02)。BABA入路术后疼痛最明显,而TO入路在术后第1天(TA,3.09±0.96;BABA,3.59±0.92;UABA,2.39±0.54;RA,3.49±0.93;TO,2.01±0.37;P = 0.04)和第3天(TA,2.10±0.77;BABA,2.59±0.88;UABA,1.84±0.37;RA,3.01±0.67;TO,1.49±0.45;P =
0.04)疼痛最轻微。TO组在术后3个月的美容效果最佳(TA,3.91±1.21;BABA,4.52±1.13;UABA,4.49±0.74;RA,4.28±0.74;TO,4.81±0.48;P = 0.04)。
我们介绍了单一外科医生采用五种不同ET入路的经验以及每种入路的经验教训,并进行了文献综述。这些数据可能有助于内镜甲状腺外科医生从各种ET入路中进行选择。