Department of Cardiology, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University of Munich, Germany.
Division of Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
Vasa. 2022 Jul;51(4):247-255. doi: 10.1024/0301-1526/a001006. Epub 2022 May 11.
The influence of diabetes mellitus (DM) on recurrent in-stent restenosis (ISR) of femoropopliteal arteries remains understudied. We investigated whether DM has an impact on recurrent restenosis after femoropopliteal stenting in patients included in the dRug-coatEd balloon angioPlasty for femoropopliteAl In-stent Restenosis (REPAIR) cooperation. The REPAIR cooperation pooled the patient-level data from 3 randomized trials in which patients with ISR of femoropopliteal arteries received either drug-coated balloon (DCB) or plain balloon angioplasty. For this analysis, patients were divided in two groups based on whether they had or had not a DM diagnosis at the time of enrollment. The primary outcome was target lesion revascularization (TLR). The main secondary outcome was recurrent ISR. Other outcomes of interest were death, Rutherford class improvement and ankle-brachial index at follow-up. 256 patients (DM, n=99 vs. non-DM, n=157) with 12-month follow-up were included in the analysis. Compared to non-DM patients, DM patients displayed no difference in terms of TLR [adjusted hazard ratio (95% Confidence intervals): 0.96 (0.55, 1.69), p=0.89] and recurrent ISR [1.04 (0.61, 1.77), p=0.88], whilst mortality was higher [9.38 (1.06, 83.11), p=0.044]. There were no differences between groups with respect to other secondary outcomes. The percutaneous treatment with DCB as compared to plain balloon angioplasty significantly reduced the risk of TLR and recurrent ISR without an excess risk of death irrespective of DM (p for interaction ≥0.70). In patients with femoropopliteal ISR, diabetes has a neutral effect on the risk of recurrence, but increases mortality at 12-month follow-up. DCB as compared to plain balloon angioplasty is associated with superior efficacy without trade-off in safety, regardless of diabetes.
糖尿病(DM)对股腘动脉支架内再狭窄(ISR)的影响仍研究不足。我们研究了 DM 是否会影响包括在 Drug-coatEd balloon angioPlasty for femoropopliteAl In-stent Restenosis(REPAIR)合作中的股腘动脉 ISR 患者的支架内再次狭窄。REPAIR 合作汇总了 3 项随机试验的患者水平数据,其中股腘动脉 ISR 患者接受药物涂层球囊(DCB)或普通球囊血管成形术。在这项分析中,根据患者入组时是否患有 DM 诊断,将患者分为两组。主要终点是靶病变血运重建(TLR)。主要次要终点是再发 ISR。其他关注的结局是死亡、Rutherford 分级改善和随访时的踝肱指数。
在有 12 个月随访的 256 名患者(DM,n=99 与非 DM,n=157)中进行了分析。与非 DM 患者相比,DM 患者在 TLR 方面没有差异[调整后的危险比(95%置信区间):0.96(0.55,1.69),p=0.89]和再发 ISR[1.04(0.61,1.77),p=0.88],而死亡率更高[9.38(1.06,83.11),p=0.044]。两组在其他次要结局方面无差异。与普通球囊血管成形术相比,DCB 的经皮治疗显著降低了 TLR 和再发 ISR 的风险,且不论是否存在 DM,均无死亡风险增加(p 交互作用≥0.70)。
在股腘动脉 ISR 患者中,糖尿病对复发风险无影响,但会增加 12 个月时的死亡率。与普通球囊血管成形术相比,DCB 具有更好的疗效,且安全性无差异,无论是否存在糖尿病。