Department of Surgery, Division of Emergency Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Acad Emerg Med. 2022 May;29(5):526-560. doi: 10.1111/acem.14495. Epub 2022 May 11.
This second Guideline for Reasonable and Appropriate Care in the Emergency Department (GRACE-2) from the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine is on the topic "low-risk, recurrent abdominal pain in the emergency department." The multidisciplinary guideline panel applied the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to assess the certainty of evidence and strength of recommendations regarding four priority questions for adult emergency department patients with low-risk, recurrent, undifferentiated abdominal pain. The intended population includes adults with multiple similar presentations of abdominal signs and symptoms recurring over a period of months or years. The panel reached the following recommendations: (1) if a prior negative computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis (CTAP) has been performed within 12 months, there is insufficient evidence to accurately identify populations in whom repeat CTAP imaging can be safely avoided or routinely recommended; (2) if CTAP with IV contrast is negative, we suggest against ultrasound unless there is concern for pelvic or biliary pathology; (3) we suggest that screening for depression and/or anxiety may be performed during the ED evaluation; and (4) we suggest an opioid-minimizing strategy for pain control. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The GRACE-2 writing group developed clinically relevant questions to address the care of adult patients with low-risk, recurrent, previously undifferentiated abdominal pain in the emergency department (ED). Four patient-intervention-comparison-outcome-time (PICOT) questions were developed by consensus of the writing group, who performed a systematic review of the literature and then synthesized direct and indirect evidence to formulate recommendations, following GRADE methodology. The writing group found that despite the commonality and relevance of these questions in emergency care, the quantity and quality of evidence were very limited, and even fundamental definitions of the population and outcomes of interest are lacking. Future research opportunities include developing precise and clinically relevant definitions of low-risk, recurrent, undifferentiated abdominal pain and determining the scope of the existing populations in terms of annual national ED visits for this complaint, costs of care, and patient and provider preferences.
这份来自学术急救医学协会的《合理与适当急诊科护理指南 2 版》(GRACE-2)是关于“急诊科低风险、复发性腹痛”的。多学科指南小组应用推荐评估、制定与评估分级(GRADE)方法评估了四项关于低风险、复发性、未分化腹痛的成年急诊科患者优先问题的证据确定性和推荐强度。目标人群包括有多个相似腹部体征和症状表现、在数月或数年内反复发作的成年人。专家组提出以下建议:(1)如果在 12 个月内已进行过腹部和骨盆的阴性计算机断层扫描(CTAP),则没有足够的证据能够准确确定可以安全避免或常规推荐重复 CTAP 成像的人群;(2)如果静脉内造影 CTAP 为阴性,则不建议进行超声检查,除非怀疑存在盆腔或胆道病变;(3)建议在急诊科评估期间进行抑郁和/或焦虑筛查;(4)建议采用阿片类药物最小化策略进行疼痛控制。摘要:GRACE-2 写作组提出了临床相关问题,以解决急诊科(ED)低风险、复发性、先前未分化腹痛的成年患者的护理问题。写作组通过共识制定了四个患者干预比较结局时间(PICOT)问题,然后进行了文献系统回顾,随后根据 GRADE 方法综合直接和间接证据制定了建议。写作组发现,尽管这些问题在急救护理中具有常见性和相关性,但证据的数量和质量非常有限,甚至缺乏感兴趣的人群和结局的基本定义。未来的研究机会包括制定低风险、复发性、未分化腹痛的精确和临床相关定义,并根据每年全国 ED 因该疾病就诊的情况、护理成本以及患者和提供者的偏好来确定现有人群的范围。