• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急诊科合理与适当医疗指南 2(GRACE-2):急诊科的低危、复发性腹痛。

Guidelines for Reasonable and Appropriate Care in the Emergency Department 2 (GRACE-2): Low-risk, recurrent abdominal pain in the emergency department.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Division of Emergency Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

出版信息

Acad Emerg Med. 2022 May;29(5):526-560. doi: 10.1111/acem.14495. Epub 2022 May 11.

DOI:10.1111/acem.14495
PMID:35543712
Abstract

This second Guideline for Reasonable and Appropriate Care in the Emergency Department (GRACE-2) from the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine is on the topic "low-risk, recurrent abdominal pain in the emergency department." The multidisciplinary guideline panel applied the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to assess the certainty of evidence and strength of recommendations regarding four priority questions for adult emergency department patients with low-risk, recurrent, undifferentiated abdominal pain. The intended population includes adults with multiple similar presentations of abdominal signs and symptoms recurring over a period of months or years. The panel reached the following recommendations: (1) if a prior negative computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis (CTAP) has been performed within 12 months, there is insufficient evidence to accurately identify populations in whom repeat CTAP imaging can be safely avoided or routinely recommended; (2) if CTAP with IV contrast is negative, we suggest against ultrasound unless there is concern for pelvic or biliary pathology; (3) we suggest that screening for depression and/or anxiety may be performed during the ED evaluation; and (4) we suggest an opioid-minimizing strategy for pain control. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The GRACE-2 writing group developed clinically relevant questions to address the care of adult patients with low-risk, recurrent, previously undifferentiated abdominal pain in the emergency department (ED). Four patient-intervention-comparison-outcome-time (PICOT) questions were developed by consensus of the writing group, who performed a systematic review of the literature and then synthesized direct and indirect evidence to formulate recommendations, following GRADE methodology. The writing group found that despite the commonality and relevance of these questions in emergency care, the quantity and quality of evidence were very limited, and even fundamental definitions of the population and outcomes of interest are lacking. Future research opportunities include developing precise and clinically relevant definitions of low-risk, recurrent, undifferentiated abdominal pain and determining the scope of the existing populations in terms of annual national ED visits for this complaint, costs of care, and patient and provider preferences.

摘要

这份来自学术急救医学协会的《合理与适当急诊科护理指南 2 版》(GRACE-2)是关于“急诊科低风险、复发性腹痛”的。多学科指南小组应用推荐评估、制定与评估分级(GRADE)方法评估了四项关于低风险、复发性、未分化腹痛的成年急诊科患者优先问题的证据确定性和推荐强度。目标人群包括有多个相似腹部体征和症状表现、在数月或数年内反复发作的成年人。专家组提出以下建议:(1)如果在 12 个月内已进行过腹部和骨盆的阴性计算机断层扫描(CTAP),则没有足够的证据能够准确确定可以安全避免或常规推荐重复 CTAP 成像的人群;(2)如果静脉内造影 CTAP 为阴性,则不建议进行超声检查,除非怀疑存在盆腔或胆道病变;(3)建议在急诊科评估期间进行抑郁和/或焦虑筛查;(4)建议采用阿片类药物最小化策略进行疼痛控制。摘要:GRACE-2 写作组提出了临床相关问题,以解决急诊科(ED)低风险、复发性、先前未分化腹痛的成年患者的护理问题。写作组通过共识制定了四个患者干预比较结局时间(PICOT)问题,然后进行了文献系统回顾,随后根据 GRADE 方法综合直接和间接证据制定了建议。写作组发现,尽管这些问题在急救护理中具有常见性和相关性,但证据的数量和质量非常有限,甚至缺乏感兴趣的人群和结局的基本定义。未来的研究机会包括制定低风险、复发性、未分化腹痛的精确和临床相关定义,并根据每年全国 ED 因该疾病就诊的情况、护理成本以及患者和提供者的偏好来确定现有人群的范围。

相似文献

1
Guidelines for Reasonable and Appropriate Care in the Emergency Department 2 (GRACE-2): Low-risk, recurrent abdominal pain in the emergency department.急诊科合理与适当医疗指南 2(GRACE-2):急诊科的低危、复发性腹痛。
Acad Emerg Med. 2022 May;29(5):526-560. doi: 10.1111/acem.14495. Epub 2022 May 11.
2
Guidelines for reasonable and appropriate care in the emergency department (GRACE): Recurrent, low-risk chest pain in the emergency department.急诊科合理与适宜医疗指南(GRACE):急诊科反复出现的低危胸痛。
Acad Emerg Med. 2021 Jul;28(7):718-744. doi: 10.1111/acem.14296. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
3
Repeat computed tomography in recurrent abdominal pain: An evidence synthesis for guidelines for reasonable and appropriate care in the emergency department.在复发性腹痛中重复进行计算机断层扫描:为急诊合理和适当护理指南提供的证据综合。
Acad Emerg Med. 2022 May;29(5):630-648. doi: 10.1111/acem.14427. Epub 2021 Dec 26.
4
Depression and anxiety screening in emergency department patients with recurrent abdominal pain: An evidence synthesis for a clinical practice guideline.急诊科反复腹痛患者的抑郁和焦虑筛查:为临床实践指南提供的证据综合
Acad Emerg Med. 2022 May;29(5):615-629. doi: 10.1111/acem.14394. Epub 2021 Oct 19.
5
Guidelines for Reasonable and Appropriate Care in the Emergency Department (GRACE-4): Alcohol use disorder and cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome management in the emergency department.急诊科合理与适宜医疗指南(GRACE-4):急诊科酒精使用障碍和大麻素呕吐综合征的管理。
Acad Emerg Med. 2024 May;31(5):425-455. doi: 10.1111/acem.14911.
6
Clinical Practice Guideline: Nosebleed (Epistaxis) Executive Summary.临床实践指南:鼻出血(鼻衄)执行摘要。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Jan;162(1):8-25. doi: 10.1177/0194599819889955.
7
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
8
No. 385-Indications for Pelvic Examination.第385号——盆腔检查的适应症
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2019 Aug;41(8):1221-1234. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2018.12.007.
9
Assessing sensitivity and specificity of the Manchester Triage System in the evaluation of acute coronary syndrome in adult patients in emergency care: a systematic review protocol.评估曼彻斯特分诊系统在急诊护理中评估成年急性冠状动脉综合征患者时的敏感性和特异性:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Nov;13(11):64-73. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2213.
10
Effect of oral contrast for abdominal computed tomography on emergency department length of stay.口服对比剂用于腹部计算机断层扫描对急诊科住院时间的影响。
Emerg Radiol. 2010 Jul;17(4):267-73. doi: 10.1007/s10140-009-0847-1. Epub 2009 Oct 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Integrative and Complementary Health Practices for Chronic Pain: summary of clinical guideline recommendations.慢性疼痛的综合与补充健康实践:临床指南建议总结
Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2025 Aug 4;34:e20240771. doi: 10.1590/S2237-96222025v34e20240771.en. eCollection 2025.
2
Optimising evaluation pathways for non-traumatic abdominal pain in emergency settings.优化急诊环境中非创伤性腹痛的评估流程。
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2025 Jul 16;55:101387. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101387. eCollection 2025 Aug.
3
Images in Black and White: Disparities in Utilization of Computed Tomography and Ultrasound for Older Adults with Abdominal Pain.
黑白影像:老年腹痛患者计算机断层扫描和超声检查使用情况的差异
West J Emerg Med. 2025 Feb 28;26(3):452-457. doi: 10.5811/westjem.18087.
4
Trends in visits, imaging, and diagnosis for emergency department abdominal pain presentations in the United States, 2007-2019.2007 - 2019年美国急诊科腹痛就诊、影像学检查及诊断趋势
Acad Emerg Med. 2025 Jan;32(1):20-31. doi: 10.1111/acem.15017. Epub 2024 Sep 23.
5
Clinical performance of existing diagnostic criteria for pneumonia in older emergency patients: A prospective cohort study.老年急诊患者中现有肺炎诊断标准的临床性能:一项前瞻性队列研究。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 Oct;72(10):3068-3077. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19113. Epub 2024 Aug 24.
6
Frequency of Persistent Opioid Use 6 Months After Exposure to IV Opioids in the Emergency Department: A Prospective Cohort Study.急诊室静脉使用阿片类药物 6 个月后持续使用阿片类药物的频率:一项前瞻性队列研究。
J Emerg Med. 2024 Aug;67(2):e119-e127. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2024.03.018. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
7
A Critical Appraisal of AHRQ's "Diagnostic Errors" Report.对 AHRQ 报告《诊断错误》的批判性评价。
Mo Med. 2023 Mar-Apr;120(2):114-120.
8
Diagnostic accuracy of novel mRNA blood biomarkers of infection to predict outcomes in emergency department patients with undifferentiated abdominal pain.新型 mRNA 感染血液生物标志物对急诊科不明原因腹痛患者的诊断准确性预测。
Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 9;13(1):2297. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-29385-3.