Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022 Sep;306(3):887-892. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06588-z. Epub 2022 May 11.
To assess the effect of frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) protocol on live-birth rate (LBR) and clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), in single-vitrified-blastocyst transfer MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort study with FET of a single-blastocyst embryos (n = 2920 cycles) thawed 2013-2018. FET protocols were natural cycles (NC-FET) (n = 147), artificial hormone replacement treatment cycles (HRT-FET) (n = 2645), and modified NC (mNC) with hCG triggering (n = 128). Primary outcome was LBR. Adjustment for age, embryo grade, year of freezing\thawing, infertility cause, and endometrial thickness was performed.
There were no significant differences between the groups with regard to female age, embryo grade, and endometrial thickness. LBR was higher in the mNC compared to HRT-FET cycles (38.3% vs. 20.9% P < 0.0001), and in the NC compared to HRT-FET cycles (34.7% vs. 20.9%, P = 0.0002). CPR was higher in the mNC compared to HRT-FET cycles (46.1% vs. 33.3% P = 0.0003), and in the NC compared to HRT-FET cycles (45.9% vs. 33.3%, P = 0.002). There was no significant difference in LBR or CPR between NC-FET and mNC-FET. Higher LBR with NC-FET and mNC-FET remained significant after adjusting for confounders (aOR 2.42, 95%CI 1.53-3.66, P < 0.0001).
The use of the convenient artificial HRT-FET cycles must be cautiously reconsidered in light of the potential negative effect on LBR when compared with natural cycle FET.
评估冻融胚胎移植(FET)方案对活产率(LBR)和临床妊娠率(CPR)的影响,采用单囊胚玻璃化冷冻复苏后移植。
这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入 2013 年至 2018 年接受单囊胚解冻的 FET 治疗患者(n=2920 个周期)。FET 方案包括自然周期(NC-FET)(n=147)、人工激素替代治疗周期(HRT-FET)(n=2645)和改良自然周期(mNC)联合 hCG 触发(n=128)。主要结局是 LBR。调整了年龄、胚胎等级、冷冻-解冻年份、不孕原因和子宫内膜厚度等因素。
各组间女性年龄、胚胎等级和子宫内膜厚度无显著差异。mNC 组的 LBR 高于 HRT-FET 组(38.3% vs. 20.9%,P<0.0001),NC 组的 LBR 高于 HRT-FET 组(34.7% vs. 20.9%,P=0.0002)。mNC 组的 CPR 高于 HRT-FET 组(46.1% vs. 33.3%,P<0.0003),NC 组的 CPR 高于 HRT-FET 组(45.9% vs. 33.3%,P=0.002)。NC-FET 和 mNC-FET 之间的 LBR 或 CPR 无显著差异。在调整混杂因素后,NC-FET 和 mNC-FET 的 LBR 仍有显著差异(调整后 OR 2.42,95%CI 1.53-3.66,P<0.0001)。
与自然周期 FET 相比,人工 HRT-FET 周期可能对 LBR 产生负面影响,因此在选择治疗方案时必须谨慎考虑。