Suppr超能文献

术中胆管造影(IOC)的最佳技术是什么?我们机构的技术和检查结果是否最佳记录?

Optimal technique for intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) and are the technique and the findings optimally recorded at our institution?

机构信息

Gwent Centre for Digestive Diseases, Royal Gwent Hospital, Newport, NP20 2UB, Wales, UK.

Department of General Surgery, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XW, Wales, UK.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2022 Dec;36(12):8784-8789. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09301-y. Epub 2022 May 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Limited evidence exists describing the optimum protocol for intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Images saved during surgery often fail to highlight the necessary anatomical landmarks and documentation is variable. Our aim was to identify the key characteristics of an optimal IOC and evaluate current practice at our institution.

METHODS

A literature search identified quality indicators for performing IOC and documenting key findings. A standardised proforma for scoring IOC was developed. Retrospective analysis was conducted of consecutive IOCs performed during elective LC. Visual documentation of seven anatomical landmarks on the captured IOC images and textual reporting in the operation note were assessed.

RESULTS

One hundred IOCs were evaluated. Only 32 (34%) of captured images had all 7 landmarks present. All cases failed to document all seven landmarks. There was a significant difference between landmarks that could be identified on the captured images and their documentation.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that IOC image capture of the key seven landmarks and their textual reporting in this cohort is sub-optimal. We believe IOC technique, minimal data set for reporting and image capture should be standardised to allow better communication of findings and facilitate meaningful comparative research relating to the subject.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)术中胆管造影(IOC)的最佳方案的相关证据有限。术中保存的图像往往无法突出必要的解剖标志,且记录方式各不相同。我们的目的是确定最佳 IOC 的关键特征,并评估我们机构的当前实践情况。

方法

文献检索确定了进行 IOC 和记录关键发现的质量指标。制定了 IOC 评分的标准化表格。对择期 LC 期间进行的连续 IOC 进行回顾性分析。评估捕获的 IOC 图像上的七个解剖标志的视觉记录和手术记录中的文本报告。

结果

评估了 100 次 IOC。只有 32 次(34%)捕获的图像具有所有 7 个标志。所有病例均未记录所有 7 个标志。在捕获图像上可识别的标志与文字记录之间存在显著差异。

结论

本研究表明,在该队列中,对关键的七个标志进行 IOC 图像捕获及其文字报告并不理想。我们认为,IOC 技术、最小数据集的报告和图像捕获应标准化,以允许更好地交流发现,并促进与该主题相关的有意义的比较研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验