Suppr超能文献

胸段食管癌淋巴结转移图谱:一项回顾性研究。

Mapping of Lymph Node Metastasis From Thoracic Esophageal Cancer: A Retrospective Study.

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Sep;29(9):5681-5688. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-11867-9. Epub 2022 May 11.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This retrospective study was designed to investigate the optimal extent of dissection for thoracic esophageal cancer (EC) based on the incidence of lymph node metastasis (LNM).

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 1014 patients with thoracic esophageal carcinoma who underwent esophagectomy at our institution between May 2018 and November 2020. Also, the location and rate of LNM in relation to the postoperative pathological results were retrieved. We separately counted the metastasis rates of routinely excised lymph node stations according to the Japan Esophageal Society (JES) staging system.

RESULTS

A total of 1666 consecutive patients were screened, and 1014 were enrolled. Generally, the rates of LNM in thoracic EC may be arranged in the descending order of station 7 > station 106recR > station 2 > station 106recL. Esophageal cancer in the middle and lower thoracic segment also had a high rate of LNM along bilateral recurrent laryngeal nerve. Stations 106tbL and 111 were the lowest frequent sites of metastasis with rate less than 5%; only the patients with clinically positive LNs need to dissect. The cT3-4, cN+, or G3 were independent risk factors for LNM and neoadjuvant therapy did not change the distribution of LNM for thoracic EC cases.

CONCLUSIONS

This study accurately identified the distribution of LNM for thoracic EC patients. Neoadjuvant therapy could not change the overall distribution of LNM in thoracic EC patients. However, whether LNs dissection at stations 106tbL and 111 is related to the survival of thoracic EC or not, needs a long follow-up time to verify.

摘要

目的

本回顾性研究旨在探讨基于淋巴结转移(LNM)发生率的胸段食管癌(EC)最佳解剖范围。

方法

我们回顾性地确定了 2018 年 5 月至 2020 年 11 月在我院接受食管癌切除术的 1014 例胸段食管癌患者。还检索了与术后病理结果相关的 LNM 的位置和发生率。我们根据日本食管协会(JES)分期系统分别计数常规切除淋巴结站的转移率。

结果

共筛选出 1666 例连续患者,其中 1014 例入选。总体而言,胸段 EC 的 LNM 发生率可能按以下顺序排列:站 7 > 站 106recR > 站 2 > 站 106recL。中下段食管癌双侧喉返神经旁也有较高的 LNM 发生率。站 106tbL 和 111 是转移率最低的部位,不到 5%;只有临床阳性淋巴结的患者需要进行解剖。cT3-4、cN+或 G3 是 LNM 的独立危险因素,新辅助治疗并未改变胸段 EC 患者的 LNM 分布。

结论

本研究准确地确定了胸段 EC 患者的 LNM 分布。新辅助治疗不能改变胸段 EC 患者 LNM 的总体分布。然而,淋巴结在站 106tbL 和 111 处的解剖是否与胸段 EC 的生存有关,需要长期随访时间来验证。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验