• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

口服MucoRice-CTB疫苗在人体中的安全性及微生物群依赖性免疫原性:一项1期随机试验

Oral MucoRice-CTB vaccine for safety and microbiota-dependent immunogenicity in humans: a phase 1 randomised trial.

作者信息

Yuki Yoshikazu, Nojima Masanori, Hosono Osamu, Tanaka Hirotoshi, Kimura Yasumasa, Satoh Takeshi, Imoto Seiya, Uematsu Satoshi, Kurokawa Shiho, Kashima Koji, Mejima Mio, Nakahashi-Ouchida Rika, Uchida Yohei, Marui Takanori, Yoshikawa Noritada, Nagamura Fumitaka, Fujihashi Kohtaro, Kiyono Hiroshi

机构信息

Division of Mucosal Immunology, International Research and Development Center for Mucosal Vaccines, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Center for Translational Research, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Lancet Microbe. 2021 Sep;2(9):e429-e440. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(20)30196-8. Epub 2021 Jun 25.

DOI:10.1016/S2666-5247(20)30196-8
PMID:35544149
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There are an estimated 1·3-4·0 million cases of cholera and 20 000-140 000 cholera-related deaths worldwide each year. The rice-based cholera toxin B subunit (CTB) vaccine, MucoRice-CTB, is an oral candidate vaccine that does not require a cold chain, has shown efficacy in animal models, and could be of benefit in places where there is a paucity of medical infrastructure. We aim to assess the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of MucoRice-CTB in humans.

METHODS

We did a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation, phase 1 study at one centre in Tokyo, Japan. Eligible participants were healthy adult men with measurable serum and faecal antibodies against CTB at screening. Participants were excluded if they had allergy to rice; history of cholera or travellers' diarrhoea; poorly controlled constipation; abnormal results on hepatic, renal, or haematological screening tests; use of any over-the-counter drugs within 7 days before first administration; inability to use a medically acceptable means of contraception; or other reasons by medical judgment of the investigator. Three dose cohorts of participants were randomly assigned by block to receive oral MucoRice-CTB (1 g, 3 g, or 6 g) or placebo (1 g, 3 g, or 6 g), once every 2 weeks for 8 weeks (for a total of 4 doses). The dose groups were performed sequentially, and each dose cohort was completed before the higher dose cohort began. All medical staff, participants, and most trial staff were masked to treatment allocation. The primary outcomes were safety and tolerability, measured by 12-lead electrocardiogram; vital signs; haematology, biochemistry, and urinalysis; rice protein-specific serum IgE antibody concentration; and monitoring of adverse events. Participants were assessed at baseline and at 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 16 weeks after the first administration of vaccine or placebo. The safety analysis set included all participants enrolled in the trial who received at least one dose of the study drug or placebo and were compliant with good clinical practice. The full analysis population included all participants enrolled in the trial who received at least one dose of the study drug and for whom any data were obtained after the start of study drug administration. Meta-genomic analysis of study participants was performed using bacterial DNA from faecal samples before vaccination. This trial is registered with UMIN.ac.jp, UMIN000018001.

FINDINGS

Between June 23, 2015, and May 31, 2016, 226 participants were recruited and assessed for eligibility. 166 participants were excluded based on health condition or schedule. We then randomly selected 60 male volunteers aged 20-40 years who were enrolled and assigned to MucoRice-CTB (10 participants assigned to 1 g, 10 participants assigned to 3 g, and 10 participants assigned to 6 g), or placebo (10 participants assigned to 1 g, 10 participants assigned to 3 g, and 10 participants assigned to 6 g). All participants received at least one dose of study drug or placebo and were included in the safety analyses. Two participants given MucoRice-CTB 3 g and one participant given MucoRice-CTB 6 g were lost to follow-up and excluded from the efficacy analysis. Serum CTB-specific IgG and IgA antibody concentrations in participants who received 6 g MucoRice-CTB increased significantly in both a time-dependent and dose-dependent manner compared with those in the placebo groups (p for interaction=0·002 for IgG, p=0·004 for IgA). Genome analysis of subjects' faeces before vaccination revealed that compared to non-responders, responders had a gut microbiota of higher diversity with the presence of Escherichia coli and Shigella spp. 28 (93%) of 30 participants who received MucoRice-CTB at any dose had at least one adverse event during the study period, compared with 30 (100%) of 30 participants given placebo. Grade 3 or higher adverse events were reported in four participants in the MucoRice-CTB group (5 events) and four participants in the placebo group (10 events). The most common serious adverse event was haemoglobin decreased (2 events in 2 participants in the pooled MucoRice-CTB group, 2 events in 2 participants in the placebo group; all grade 3).

INTERPRETATION

Participants given MucoRice-CTB showed increased CTB-specific serum IgG and IgA antibody concentrations without inducing serious adverse events, indicating that MucoRice-CTB could be a safe and potent vaccine to prevent diarrhoeal disease. MucoRice-CTB induced neutralising antibodies against diarrhoeal toxins in a gut microbiota-dependent manner. A similar phase 1 trial will be done with participants of other ethnicities to substantiate our findings.

FUNDING

Translational Research Acceleration Network Program of Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development; Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan; Science and Technology Research Partnership for Sustainable Development; Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (S) (18H05280) (to H K) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS); Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B) (16K16144) (to Y K) from JSPS; Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (18K18148) (to Y K) from JSPS; Grant from International Joint Usage/Research Center (K3002), the Institute of Medical Science, University of Tokyo.

摘要

背景

据估计,全球每年有130万至400万例霍乱病例,以及2万至14万例与霍乱相关的死亡。基于大米的霍乱毒素B亚单位(CTB)疫苗MucoRice-CTB是一种口服候选疫苗,无需冷链,在动物模型中已显示出疗效,并且在医疗基础设施匮乏的地区可能有益。我们旨在评估MucoRice-CTB在人体中的安全性、耐受性和免疫原性。

方法

我们在日本东京的一个中心进行了一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照、剂量递增的1期研究。符合条件的参与者为在筛查时具有可测量的针对CTB的血清和粪便抗体的健康成年男性。如果参与者对大米过敏;有霍乱或旅行者腹泻病史;便秘控制不佳;肝脏、肾脏或血液学筛查试验结果异常;在首次给药前7天内使用任何非处方药;无法使用医学上可接受的避孕方法;或根据研究者的医学判断有其他原因,则将其排除。三组剂量的参与者通过区组随机分配,接受口服MucoRice-CTB(1g、3g或6g)或安慰剂(1g、3g或6g),每2周一次,共8周(总共4剂)。剂量组依次进行,每个剂量组在更高剂量组开始前完成。所有医务人员、参与者和大多数试验人员均对治疗分配不知情。主要结局为安全性和耐受性,通过12导联心电图、生命体征、血液学、生物化学和尿液分析、大米蛋白特异性血清IgE抗体浓度以及不良事件监测来衡量。在首次接种疫苗或安慰剂后的基线、1、2、4、6、8和16周对参与者进行评估。安全性分析集包括所有参与试验且接受至少一剂研究药物或安慰剂并符合良好临床实践的参与者。完整分析人群包括所有参与试验且接受至少一剂研究药物并在研究药物给药开始后获得任何数据的参与者。使用接种疫苗前粪便样本中的细菌DNA对研究参与者进行宏基因组分析。该试验已在UMIN.ac.jp注册,UMIN000018001。

结果

在2015年6月23日至2016年5月31日期间,招募了226名参与者并评估其资格。166名参与者因健康状况或日程安排被排除。然后我们随机选择了年龄在20至40岁之间的60名男性志愿者,他们被纳入并分配到MucoRice-CTB组(10名参与者分配到l g,10名参与者分配到lg,10名参与者分配到6g)或安慰剂组(10名参与者分配到1g,10名参与者分配到3g,10名参与者分配到6g)。所有参与者均接受了至少一剂研究药物或安慰剂,并纳入安全性分析。两名接受3g MucoRice-CTB的参与者和一名接受6g MucoRice-CTB的参与者失访,被排除在疗效分析之外。与安慰剂组相比,接受6g MucoRice-CTB的参与者血清CTB特异性IgG和IgA抗体浓度在时间和剂量上均显著增加(IgG的交互作用p=0.002,IgA的p=0.004)。接种疫苗前对受试者粪便的基因组分析显示,与无反应者相比,有反应者的肠道微生物群多样性更高,存在大肠杆菌和志贺氏菌属。在研究期间,接受任何剂量MucoRice-CTB的30名参与者中有28名(93%)至少发生了一次不良事件,而接受安慰剂的30名参与者中有30名(100%)发生了不良事件。MucoRice-CTB组有4名参与者(5起事件)和安慰剂组有4名参与者(10起事件)报告了3级或更高等级的不良事件。最常见严重不良事件是血红蛋白降低(合并MucoRice-CTB组2名参与者发生2起事件,安慰剂组2名参与者发生2起事件;均为3级)。

解读

给予MucoRice-CTB的参与者CTB特异性血清IgG和IgA抗体浓度增加,且未引发严重不良事件,表明MucoRice-CTB可能是一种预防腹泻病的安全有效的疫苗。MucoRice-CTB以肠道微生物群依赖的方式诱导针对腹泻毒素的中和抗体。将对其他种族的参与者进行类似的1期试验以证实我们的发现。

资助

日本医疗研究与开发机构的转化研究加速网络计划;日本文部科学省;可持续发展科学技术研究伙伴关系;日本学术振兴会科学研究资助(S)(18H05280)(授予H K);日本学术振兴会青年科学家资助(B)(16K16144)(授予Y K);日本学术振兴会青年科学家资助(18K18148)(授予Y K);东京大学医学科学研究所国际联合使用/研究中心(K3002)资助。

相似文献

1
Oral MucoRice-CTB vaccine for safety and microbiota-dependent immunogenicity in humans: a phase 1 randomised trial.口服MucoRice-CTB疫苗在人体中的安全性及微生物群依赖性免疫原性:一项1期随机试验
Lancet Microbe. 2021 Sep;2(9):e429-e440. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(20)30196-8. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
2
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (inactivated, Vero cell): a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.一项评估 SARS-CoV-2 疫苗(灭活,Vero 细胞)有效性和安全性的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照 III 期临床试验:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Apr 13;22(1):276. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05180-1.
3
Safety and immunogenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 ARCoV mRNA vaccine in Chinese adults: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1 trial.新型冠状病毒 ARCoV mRNA 疫苗在中国成年人中的安全性和免疫原性:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、1 期临床试验。
Lancet Microbe. 2022 Mar;3(3):e193-e202. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(21)00280-9. Epub 2022 Jan 24.
4
Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in healthy adults aged 18-59 years: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1/2 clinical trial.一项在 18-59 岁健康成年人中进行的新型冠状病毒灭活疫苗的安全性、耐受性和免疫原性的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、1/2 期临床试验。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Feb;21(2):181-192. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30843-4. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
5
Safety and immunogenicity of a protein subunit COVID-19 vaccine (ZF2001) in healthy children and adolescents aged 3-17 years in China: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1 trial and an open-label, non-randomised, non-inferiority, phase 2 trial.中国健康儿童和青少年中 3-17 岁人群中使用一种新型冠状病毒蛋白亚单位疫苗(ZF2001)的安全性和免疫原性:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、1 期临床试验和一项开放标签、非随机、非劣效性、2 期临床试验。
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2023 Apr;7(4):269-279. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(22)00376-5. Epub 2023 Feb 17.
6
Safety and immunogenicity of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine administered in a prime-boost regimen in young and old adults (COV002): a single-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 2/3 trial.在年轻和老年成年人中进行的一次单盲、随机、对照、2/3 期试验中,观察 ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 疫苗在初免-加强免疫方案中的安全性和免疫原性(COV002)。
Lancet. 2021 Dec 19;396(10267):1979-1993. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32466-1. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
7
Safety and immunogenicity of a recombinant tandem-repeat dimeric RBD-based protein subunit vaccine (ZF2001) against COVID-19 in adults: two randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1 and 2 trials.一种基于重组串联重复二聚体 RBD 的蛋白亚单位疫苗(ZF2001)在成年人中的安全性和免疫原性:两项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、1 期和 2 期临床试验。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Aug;21(8):1107-1119. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00127-4. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
8
Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (CoronaVac) in healthy adults aged 60 years and older: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1/2 clinical trial.一种灭活严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2疫苗(科兴新冠疫苗)在60岁及以上健康成年人中的安全性、耐受性和免疫原性:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的1/2期临床试验
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Jun;21(6):803-812. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30987-7. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
9
Safety and immunogenicity of an AS03-adjuvanted SARS-CoV-2 recombinant protein vaccine (CoV2 preS dTM) in healthy adults: interim findings from a phase 2, randomised, dose-finding, multicentre study.AS03 佐剂新型冠状病毒 2 重组蛋白疫苗(CoV2 preS dTM)在健康成年人中的安全性和免疫原性:一项 2 期、随机、剂量发现、多中心研究的中期结果。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2022 May;22(5):636-648. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00764-7. Epub 2022 Jan 25.
10
Safety and immunogenicity following a homologous booster dose of a SARS-CoV-2 recombinant spike protein vaccine (NVX-CoV2373): a secondary analysis of a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial.同源加强接种 SARS-CoV-2 重组刺突蛋白疫苗(NVX-CoV2373)的安全性和免疫原性:一项随机、安慰剂对照、2 期临床试验的二次分析。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2022 Nov;22(11):1565-1576. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00420-0. Epub 2022 Aug 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Plant-based edible vaccines: Can cholera be the case study in Africa?植物源可食用疫苗:霍乱能成为非洲的案例研究对象吗?
J Genet Eng Biotechnol. 2025 Sep;23(3):100527. doi: 10.1016/j.jgeb.2025.100527. Epub 2025 Jun 23.
2
Novel insights into ORFV B2L DNA vaccine-mediated gut microbiota modulation and immune augmentation in rats.对羊口疮病毒B2L DNA疫苗介导的大鼠肠道微生物群调节和免疫增强的新见解。
Front Immunol. 2025 Jul 18;16:1598969. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1598969. eCollection 2025.
3
Biological threat preparedness through vaccine development and stockpiling: challenges and strategic implications.
通过疫苗研发和储备实现生物威胁防范:挑战与战略影响
Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 2;13:1614626. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1614626. eCollection 2025.
4
Impact of Infection on the Gut Microbiome and Hepatitis B Vaccine Immune Response in Fishing Communities of Lake Victoria, Uganda.感染对乌干达维多利亚湖渔业社区肠道微生物群和乙肝疫苗免疫反应的影响
Vaccines (Basel). 2025 Mar 31;13(4):375. doi: 10.3390/vaccines13040375.
5
Dynamics of IgM and IgA Antibody Response Profile Against Toxins A, B, and P.针对毒素A、B和P的IgM和IgA抗体反应谱的动态变化
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Apr 9;26(8):3507. doi: 10.3390/ijms26083507.
6
Cholera in Sub-Saharan Africa: Unveiling neglected drivers and pathways to elimination.撒哈拉以南非洲的霍乱:揭示被忽视的驱动因素和消除途径。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2025 Apr 23;19(4):e0013029. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0013029. eCollection 2025 Apr.
7
Intestinal Microbiota and Vaccinations: A Systematic Review of the Literature.肠道微生物群与疫苗接种:文献系统综述
Vaccines (Basel). 2025 Mar 12;13(3):306. doi: 10.3390/vaccines13030306.
8
Vibrio cholerae: Understanding a persistent pathogen in Sub-Saharan Africa and the East Mediterranean Region.霍乱弧菌:了解撒哈拉以南非洲和东地中海地区的一种持续性病原体。
Pathog Dis. 2025 Jan 30;83. doi: 10.1093/femspd/ftaf004.
9
Systematic review of the impact of intestinal microbiota on vaccine responses.肠道微生物群对疫苗反应影响的系统评价。
NPJ Vaccines. 2024 Dec 20;9(1):254. doi: 10.1038/s41541-024-01000-0.
10
Comparative analysis of COVID-19 responses in Japan and Africa: diet, phytochemicals, vitamin D, and gut microbiota in reducing mortality-A systematic review and meta-analysis.日本与非洲应对新冠疫情的比较分析:饮食、植物化学物质、维生素D及肠道微生物群对降低死亡率的影响——一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Nutr. 2024 Oct 7;11:1465324. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1465324. eCollection 2024.