Anhui Zhifei Longcom Biopharmaceutical, Hefei, China.
CAS Key Laboratory of Pathogenic Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Aug;21(8):1107-1119. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00127-4. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
Although several COVID-19 vaccines have been developed so far, they will not be sufficient to meet the global demand. Development of a wider range of vaccines, with different mechanisms of action, could help control the spread of SARS-CoV-2 globally. We developed a protein subunit vaccine against COVID-19 using a dimeric form of the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein as the antigen. We aimed to assess the safety and immunogenicity of this vaccine, ZF2001, and determine the appropriate dose and schedule for an efficacy study.
We did two randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1 and phase 2 trials. Phase 1 was done at two university hospitals in Chongqing and Beijing, China, and phase 2 was done at the Hunan Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention in Xiangtan, China. Healthy adults aged 18-59 years, without a history of SARS-CoV or SARS-CoV-2 infection, an RT-PCR-positive test result for SARS-CoV-2, a history of contact with confirmed or suspected COVID-19 cases, and severe allergies to any component of the vaccine were eligible for enrolment. In phase 1, participants were randomly assigned (2:2:1) to receive three doses of the vaccine (25 μg or 50 μg) or placebo intramuscularly, 30 days apart. In phase 2, participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1:1:1) to receive the vaccine (25 μg or 50 μg) or placebo intramuscularly, 30 days apart, in either a two-dose schedule or a three-dose schedule. Investigators, participants, and the laboratory team were masked to group allocation. For phase 1, the primary outcome was safety, measured by the occurrence of adverse events and serious adverse events. For phase 2, the primary outcome was safety and immunogenicity (the seroconversion rate and the magnitude, in geometric mean titres [GMTs], of SARS-CoV-2-neutralising antibodies). Analyses were done on an intention-to-treat and per-protocol basis. These trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04445194 and NCT04466085) and participant follow-up is ongoing.
Between June 22 and July 3, 2020, 50 participants were enrolled into the phase 1 trial and randomly assigned to receive three doses of placebo (n=10), the 25 μg vaccine (n=20), or the 50 μg vaccine (n=20). The mean age of participants was 32·6 (SD 9·4) years. Between July 12 and July 17, 2020, 900 participants were enrolled into the phase 2 trial and randomly assigned to receive two doses of placebo (n=150), 25 μg vaccine (n=150), or 50 μg vaccine (n=150), or three doses of placebo (n=150), 25 μg vaccine (n=150), or 50 μg vaccine (n=150). The mean age of participants was 43·5 (SD 9·2) years. In both phase 1 and phase 2, adverse events reported within 30 days after vaccination were mild or moderate (grade 1 or 2) in most cases (phase 1: six [60%] of ten participants in the placebo group, 14 [70%] of 20 in the 25 μg group, and 18 [90%] of 20 in the 50 μg group; phase 2: 37 [25%] of 150 in the two-dose placebo group, 43 [29%] of 150 in the two-dose 25 μg group, 50 [33%] of 150 in the two-dose 50 μg group, 47 [31%] of 150 in the three-dose placebo group, 72 [48%] of 150 in the three-dose 25 μg group, and 65 [43%] of 150 in the three-dose 50 μg group). In phase 1, two (10%) grade 3 or worse adverse events were reported in the 50 μg group. In phase 2, grade 3 or worse adverse events were reported by 18 participants (four [3%] in the two-dose 25 μg vaccine group, two [1%] in the two-dose 50 μg vaccine group, two [1%] in the three-dose placebo group, four [3%] in the three-dose 25 μg vaccine group, and six [4%] in the three-dose 50 μg vaccine group), and 11 were considered vaccine related (two [1%] in the two-dose 25 μg vaccine group, one [1%] in the two-dose 50 μg vaccine group, one [1%] in the three-dose placebo group, two [1%] in the three-dose 25 μg vaccine group, and five [3%] in the three-dose 50 μg vaccine group); seven participants reported serious adverse events (one [1%] in the two-dose 25 μg vaccine group, one [1%] in the two-dose 50 μg vaccine group, two [1%] in the three-dose placebo group, one [1%] in the three-dose 25 μg vaccine group, and two [1%] in the three-dose 50 μg vaccine group), but none was considered vaccine related. In phase 2, on the two-dose schedule, seroconversion rates of neutralising antibodies 14 days after the second dose were 76% (114 of 150 participants) in the 25 μg group and 72% (108 of 150) in the 50 μg group; on the three-dose schedule, seroconversion rates of neutralising antibodies 14 days after the third dose were 97% (143 of 148 participants) in the 25 μg group and 93% (138 of 148) in the 50 μg group. In the two-dose groups in phase 2, the SARS-CoV-2-neutralising GMTs 14 days after the second dose were 17·7 (95% CI 13·6-23·1) in the 25 μg group and 14·1 (10·8-18·3) in the 50 μg group. In the three-dose groups in phase 2, the SARS-CoV-2-neutralising GMTs 14 days after the third dose were 102·5 (95% CI 81·8-128·5) in the 25 μg group and 69·1 (53·0-90·0) in the 50 μg group.
The protein subunit vaccine ZF2001 appears to be well tolerated and immunogenic. The safety and immunogenicity data from the phase 1 and 2 trials support the use of the 25 μg dose in a three-dose schedule in an ongoing phase 3 trial for large-scale evaluation of ZF2001's safety and efficacy.
National Program on Key Research Project of China, National Science and Technology Major Projects of Drug Discovery, Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, and Anhui Zhifei Longcom Biopharmaceutical.
For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
迄今为止,已经开发出了几种 COVID-19 疫苗,但它们仍不足以满足全球需求。开发具有不同作用机制的更广泛的疫苗种类可能有助于控制 SARS-CoV-2 在全球的传播。我们使用 SARS-CoV-2 刺突蛋白的二聚体形式的受体结合域(RBD)作为抗原,开发了一种针对 COVID-19 的蛋白亚单位疫苗 ZF2001。我们旨在评估这种 ZF2001 疫苗的安全性和免疫原性,并确定在疗效研究中合适的剂量和方案。
我们进行了两项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的 1 期和 2 期临床试验。1 期试验在重庆和北京的两所大学医院进行,2 期试验在湖南疾病预防控制中心进行。年龄在 18-59 岁之间、无 SARS-CoV 或 SARS-CoV-2 感染史、SARS-CoV-2 核酸检测阳性、与确诊或疑似 COVID-19 病例有接触史以及对疫苗任何成分严重过敏的健康成年人有资格参加。在 1 期试验中,参与者被随机分配(2:2:1)接受三剂疫苗(25μg 或 50μg)或安慰剂肌内注射,间隔 30 天。在 2 期试验中,参与者被随机分配(1:1:1:1:1:1)接受疫苗(25μg 或 50μg)或安慰剂肌内注射,间隔 30 天,方案为两剂方案或三剂方案。研究人员、参与者和实验室团队对分组分配情况进行了屏蔽。对于 1 期试验,主要结局是安全性,通过不良事件和严重不良事件的发生来衡量。对于 2 期试验,主要结局是安全性和免疫原性(中和抗体的血清转化率和几何平均滴度[GMTs])。分析采用意向治疗和方案治疗原则。这些试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册(NCT04445194 和 NCT04466085),参与者随访正在进行中。
2020 年 6 月 22 日至 7 月 3 日,50 名参与者被纳入 1 期试验,并随机接受三剂安慰剂(n=10)、25μg 疫苗(n=20)或 50μg 疫苗(n=20)。参与者的平均年龄为 32.6(SD 9.4)岁。2020 年 7 月 12 日至 7 月 17 日,900 名参与者被纳入 2 期试验,并随机接受两剂安慰剂(n=150)、25μg 疫苗(n=150)或 50μg 疫苗(n=150),或三剂安慰剂(n=150)、25μg 疫苗(n=150)或 50μg 疫苗(n=150)。参与者的平均年龄为 43.5(SD 9.2)岁。在 1 期和 2 期试验中,接种后 30 天内报告的不良事件在大多数情况下为轻度或中度(1 级或 2 级)(1 期:安慰剂组 10 名参与者中有 6 名[60%],25μg 组 20 名中有 14 名[70%],50μg 组 20 名中有 18 名[90%];2 期:两剂安慰剂组 150 名参与者中有 37 名[25%],两剂 25μg 组 150 名中有 43 名[29%],两剂 50μg 组 150 名中有 50 名[33%],三剂安慰剂组 150 名参与者中有 47 名[31%],三剂 25μg 组 150 名参与者中有 72 名[48%],三剂 50μg 组 150 名参与者中有 65 名[43%])。在 1 期试验中,有 2 名(10%)参与者报告了 50μg 组的 3 级或更高级别的不良事件。在 2 期试验中,有 18 名参与者(两剂 25μg 疫苗组 4 名[3%],两剂 50μg 疫苗组 2 名[1%],三剂安慰剂组 2 名[1%],三剂 25μg 疫苗组 4 名[3%],三剂 50μg 疫苗组 6 名[4%])报告了 3 级或更高级别的不良事件,其中 11 项被认为与疫苗相关(两剂 25μg 疫苗组 2 名[1%],两剂 50μg 疫苗组 1 名[1%],三剂安慰剂组 1 名[1%],三剂 25μg 疫苗组 2 名[1%],三剂 50μg 疫苗组 5 名[3%]);有 7 名参与者报告了严重不良事件(两剂 25μg 疫苗组 1 名[1%],两剂 50μg 疫苗组 1 名[1%],三剂安慰剂组 1 名[1%],三剂 25μg 疫苗组 1 名[1%],三剂 50μg 疫苗组 2 名[1%]),但均与疫苗无关。在 2 期试验中,两剂方案中,第二剂后 14 天中和抗体的血清转化率在 25μg 组为 76%(150 名参与者中的 114 名),在 50μg 组为 72%(150 名参与者中的 108 名);在三剂方案中,第三剂后 14 天中和抗体的血清转化率在 25μg 组为 97%(148 名参与者中的 143 名),在 50μg 组为 93%(148 名参与者中的 138 名)。在 2 期两剂组中,第二剂后 14 天的 SARS-CoV-2 中和抗体 GMTs 为 17.7(95%CI 13.6-23.1)在 25μg 组和 14.1(10.8-18.3)在 50μg 组。在 2 期三剂组中,第三剂后 14 天的 SARS-CoV-2 中和抗体 GMTs 为 102.5(95%CI 81.8-128.5)在 25μg 组和 69.1(53.0-90.0)在 50μg 组。
蛋白亚单位疫苗 ZF2001 似乎具有良好的耐受性和免疫原性。1 期和 2 期试验的安全性和免疫原性数据支持在一项正在进行的 3 期试验中使用 25μg 剂量的三剂方案,以对 ZF2001 的安全性和疗效进行大规模评估。
国家重点研发计划项目、国家科技重大专项、中国科学院战略性先导科技专项和安徽省智飞龙科马生物制药有限公司。