Suppr超能文献

引入一种量化速度滑冰比赛专项训练特异性的方法。

Introducing a Method to Quantify the Specificity of Training for Races in Speed Skating.

机构信息

Department Human Movement Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.

Innovation Lab Thialf, Heerenveen, the Netherlands.

出版信息

J Strength Cond Res. 2022 Jul 1;36(7):1998-2004. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004271. Epub 2022 May 9.

Abstract

Roete, AJ, Stoter, IK, Lamberts, RP, Elferink-Gemser, MT, and Otter, RTA. Introducing a method to quantify the specificity of training for races in speed skating. J Strength Cond Res 36(7): 1998-2004, 2022-The specificity of training for races is believed to be important for performance development. However, measuring specificity is challenging. This study aimed to develop a method to quantify the specificity of speed skating training for sprint races (i.e., 500 and 1,000 m), and explore the amount of training specificity with a pilot study. On-ice training and races of 10 subelite-to-elite speed skaters were analyzed during 1 season (i.e., 26 weeks). Intensity was mapped using 5 equal zones, between 4 m·s-1 to peak velocity and 50% to peak heart rate. Training specificity was defined as skating in the intensity zone most representative for the race for a similar period as during the race. During the season, eight 500 m races, seven 1,000 m races, and 509 training sessions were analyzed, of which 414 contained heart rate and 375 sessions contained velocity measures. Within-subject analyses were performed. During races, most time was spent in the highest intensity zone (Vz5 and HRz5). In training, the highest velocity zone Vz5 was reached 107 ± 28 times, with 9 ± 3 efforts (0.3 ± 0.1% training) long enough to be considered 500 m specific, 6 ± 5 efforts (0.3 ± 0.3% training) were considered 1,000 m specific. For heart rate, HRz5 was reached 151 ± 89 times in training, 43 ± 33 efforts (1.3 ± 0.9% training) were considered 500 m specific, and 36 ± 23 efforts (3.2 ± 1.7% training) were considered 1,000 m specific. This newly developed method enables the examination of training specificity so that coaches can control whether their intended specificity was reached. It also opens doors to further explore the impact of training specificity on performance development.

摘要

罗特、AJ、斯特特、IK、兰伯茨、RP、埃尔芬格-杰姆瑟、MT 和奥特、RTA。引入一种方法来量化速度滑冰比赛的训练特异性。J 力量与调节研究 36(7):1998-2004,2022-人们相信,比赛的训练特异性对表现的发展很重要。然而,测量特异性是具有挑战性的。本研究旨在开发一种方法来量化速度滑冰训练的短跑比赛特异性(即 500 米和 1000 米),并通过一项初步研究探索训练特异性的程度。在一个赛季(即 26 周)中,分析了 10 名亚精英到精英速滑运动员的场内训练和比赛。使用 5 个相等的区域来映射强度,范围从 4 m·s-1 到最高速度和 50%到最高心率。训练特异性被定义为在与比赛相似的时间段内在最能代表比赛的强度区域内滑冰。在这个赛季中,分析了 8 场 500 米比赛、7 场 1000 米比赛和 509 次训练,其中 414 次包含心率,375 次包含速度测量。进行了个体内分析。在比赛中,大部分时间都花在最高强度区(Vz5 和 HRz5)。在训练中,达到了最高速度区 Vz5 107±28 次,其中 9±3 次努力(0.3±0.1%的训练)足够长,被认为是 500 米特异性的,6±5 次努力(0.3±0.3%的训练)被认为是 1000 米特异性的。对于心率,在训练中达到了 HRz5 151±89 次,其中 43±33 次努力(1.3±0.9%的训练)被认为是 500 米特异性的,36±23 次努力(3.2±1.7%的训练)被认为是 1000 米特异性的。这种新开发的方法使检查训练特异性成为可能,从而使教练可以控制是否达到了他们预期的特异性。它也为进一步探索训练特异性对表现发展的影响打开了大门。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验