Suppr超能文献

心力衰竭伴射血分数保留的心房颤动患者的导管消融治疗:一项荟萃分析。

Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: A meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of the Fourth School of Clinical Medicine, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.

Department of Nursing College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.

出版信息

Clin Cardiol. 2022 Jul;45(7):786-793. doi: 10.1002/clc.23841. Epub 2022 May 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Catheter ablation (CA) is an effective treatment for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The potential of CA to benefit AF patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is uncertain.

HYPOTHESIS

CA may be safe and effective for patients with HFpEF.

METHODS

The Medline, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies evaluating CA for AF patients with HFpEF.

RESULTS

A total of seven trials with 1696 patients were included. Pooled analyses demonstrated similar procedure and fluoroscopy time regarding the use of CA for patients with HFpEF and without HF (weighted mean difference [WMD]: 0.40; 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.01-0.81, p = .05 and [WMD: 0.05; 95% CI: -0.18-0.28, p = .68]). Moreover, CA was effective in maintaining sinus rhythm (SR) in patients with HFpEF and noninferior for patients without HF [risk ratio (RR): 0.92; 95% CI: 0.76-1.10, p = .34). Additionally, CA tended to significantly maintain SR (RR: 4.73; 95% CI: 1.86-12.03, p = .001) and reduce rehospitalization for HF compared with medical therapy (RR: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.19-0.71, p = .003). However, no significant differences were found between two groups regarding the mortality rate (p = .59).

CONCLUSION

CA is a potential treatment strategy for patients with HFpEF and demonstrates equivalent efficacy to that of patients without HF. Moreover, the benefits of CA in maintaining SR and reducing rehospitalization of HF patients were significantly better than those of medical therapy. Additional randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm our results.

摘要

背景

导管消融(CA)是治疗心房颤动(AF)患者的有效方法。CA 对射血分数保留的心力衰竭(HFpEF)AF 患者的潜在益处尚不确定。

假设

CA 对 HFpEF 患者可能是安全有效的。

方法

检索 Medline、PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane Library 数据库,评估 CA 治疗 HFpEF 合并 AF 患者的研究。

结果

共纳入 7 项包含 1696 例患者的试验。汇总分析表明,HFpEF 患者与非 HFpEF 患者使用 CA 时,手术和透视时间相似(加权均数差值 [WMD]:0.40;95%置信区间 [CI]:-0.01-0.81,p=0.05 和 [WMD:0.05;95% CI:-0.18-0.28,p=0.68])。此外,CA 有效维持 HFpEF 患者的窦律(SR),且疗效不劣于非 HFpEF 患者[风险比(RR):0.92;95% CI:0.76-1.10,p=0.34]。此外,与药物治疗相比,CA 更倾向于显著维持 SR(RR:4.73;95% CI:1.86-12.03,p=0.001)并降低 HF 再住院率(RR:0.36;95% CI:0.19-0.71,p=0.003)。然而,两组间死亡率无显著差异(p=0.59)。

结论

CA 是 HFpEF 患者的潜在治疗策略,与非 HFpEF 患者疗效相当。此外,CA 在维持 SR 和降低 HF 患者再住院率方面的获益明显优于药物治疗。需要进一步的随机对照试验来证实我们的结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fae2/9286329/c90a562a406e/CLC-45-786-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验