Suppr超能文献

基于正念的干预对非心因性持续性胸痛患者(MIPIC)的可行性随机对照研究。

Mindfulness-based intervention in patients with persistent pain in chest (MIPIC) of non-cardiac cause: a feasibility randomised control study.

机构信息

Heart Division, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

Faculty of Medicine, National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Open Heart. 2022 May;9(1). doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2022-001970.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The study evaluated the feasibility of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) in patients with non-cardiac chest pain by assessing their willingness to participate and adhere to the programme, and for these data to help further refine the content of MBCT for chest pain.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This prospective 2:1 randomised controlled trial compared the intervention of adapted MBCT as an addition to usual care with just usual care in controls. Among 573 patients who attended the rapid access chest pain clinic over the previous 12 months and were not diagnosed with a cardiac cause but had persistent chest pain were invited. The intervention was a 2-hour, weekly, online guided 8-week MBCT course. Compliance with attendance and the home practice was recorded. Enrolled patients completed the Seattle angina questionnaire (SAQ), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Cardiac Anxiety Questionnaire, Five-Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire, and Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Level at baseline assessment and after 8-week period.

RESULTS

Persistent chest pain was reported by 114 patients. Of these, 33 (29%) patients with a mean age of 54.2 (±12.2) years and 68% women, consented to the study. Baseline questionnaires revealed mild physical limitation (mean SAQ, 76.8±25), high levels of anxiety (76%) and depression (53%), modest cardiac anxiety (CAQ,1.78±0.61) and mindfulness score (FFMQ, 45.5±7.3). Six patients subsequently withdrew due to bereavement, caring responsibilities and ill health. Of the remaining 27 participants, 18 in the intervention arm attended an average of 5 sessions with 61% attending ≥6 sessions. Although not statistically powered, the study revealed a significant reduction in general anxiety, improved mindfulness and a trend towards improvement in SAQ scores in the intervention arm.

CONCLUSION

One-third of patients with persistent non-cardiac chest pain were willing to participate in mindfulness-based therapy. An improvement in anxiety and mindfulness was detected in this feasibility study. A larger trial is required to demonstrate improvement in chest pain symptoms.

摘要

目的

本研究通过评估患者参与和坚持该方案的意愿,来评估基于正念认知疗法(MBCT)在非心源性胸痛患者中的可行性,为进一步完善胸痛 MBCT 内容提供数据支持。

患者和方法

这是一项前瞻性 2:1 随机对照试验,将改良 MBCT 作为附加常规治疗与单纯常规治疗进行比较。在过去 12 个月内参加快速就诊胸痛诊所但未被诊断为心脏原因且持续胸痛的 573 名患者中,邀请他们参加。干预措施为每周一次、每次 2 小时的在线指导 8 周 MBCT 课程。记录出勤率和家庭练习的依从性。入组患者在基线评估和 8 周后完成西雅图心绞痛问卷(SAQ)、医院焦虑和抑郁量表、心脏焦虑问卷、五因素正念问卷和欧洲生活质量-5 维-5 级量表。

结果

114 名患者报告持续胸痛。其中,33 名(29%)患者平均年龄为 54.2(±12.2)岁,68%为女性,同意参加研究。基线问卷显示轻度躯体受限(平均 SAQ,76.8±25)、高焦虑(76%)和抑郁(53%)、中度心脏焦虑(CAQ,1.78±0.61)和正念评分(FFMQ,45.5±7.3)。由于丧亲、照顾责任和健康状况不佳,随后有 6 名患者退出。在剩余的 27 名参与者中,18 名干预组患者平均参加了 5 次会议,其中 61%参加了≥6 次会议。尽管没有统计学效力,但该研究显示干预组的一般焦虑显著降低,正念度提高,SAQ 评分有改善趋势。

结论

三分之一的持续性非心源性胸痛患者愿意参加正念认知疗法。这项可行性研究检测到焦虑和正念度的改善。需要更大的试验来证明胸痛症状的改善。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c32/9096570/724798c00ffb/openhrt-2022-001970f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验