Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, Fulbourn, UK.
BMJ Open. 2022 May 11;12(5):e053043. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053043.
Emotional disorders (such as anxiety and depression) are associated with considerable distress and impairment in day-to-day function for affected children and young people and for their families. Effective evidence-based interventions are available but require appropriate identification of difficulties to enable timely access to services. Standardised diagnostic assessment (SDA) tools may aid in the detection of emotional disorders, but there is limited evidence on the utility of SDA tools in routine care and equipoise among professionals about their clinical value.
A multicentre, two-arm, parallel group randomised controlled trial, with embedded qualitative and health economic components. Participants will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to either the Development and Well-Being Assessment SDA tool as an adjunct to usual clinical care, or usual care only. A total of 1210 participants (children and young people referred to outpatient, specialist Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services with emotional difficulties and their parent/carers) will be recruited from at least 6 sites in England. The primary outcome is a clinician-made diagnosis about the presence of an emotional disorder within 12 months of randomisation. Secondary outcomes include referral acceptance, diagnosis and treatment of emotional disorders, symptoms of emotional difficulties and comorbid disorders and associated functional impairment.
The study received favourable opinion from the South Birmingham Research Ethics Committee (Ref. 19/WM/0133). Results of this trial will be reported to the funder and published in full in the Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Journal series and also submitted for publication in a peer reviewed journal.
ISRCTN15748675; Pre-results.
情感障碍(如焦虑和抑郁)会给受影响的儿童和青少年及其家庭带来相当大的痛苦和日常功能障碍。虽然有有效的循证干预措施,但需要适当识别困难,以便及时获得服务。标准化诊断评估(SDA)工具可能有助于发现情绪障碍,但关于 SDA 工具在常规护理中的效用以及专业人员对其临床价值的平衡方面的证据有限。
这是一项多中心、两臂、平行组随机对照试验,嵌入了定性和健康经济学组成部分。参与者将以 1:1 的比例随机分配到发展和健康评估 SDA 工具作为常规临床护理的辅助工具,或仅接受常规护理。总共将从英格兰至少 6 个地点招募 1210 名(有情绪困难的儿童和青少年及其父母/照顾者转诊到门诊、专科儿童和青少年心理健康服务)参与者。主要结果是在随机分组后 12 个月内临床医生做出的存在情绪障碍的诊断。次要结果包括转介接受、情绪障碍的诊断和治疗、情绪困难和共病障碍的症状以及相关的功能障碍。
该研究得到了南伯明翰研究伦理委员会的好评(参考号 19/WM/0133)。该试验的结果将报告给资助者,并在《卫生技术评估(HTA)杂志》系列中全文发表,并提交给同行评议杂志发表。
ISRCTN84164775;预结果。