• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对有情绪问题的儿童和青少年的标准化诊断评估的临床及成本效益:STADIA多中心随机对照试验

The clinical and cost effectiveness of a STAndardised DIagnostic Assessment for children and adolescents with emotional difficulties: the STADIA multi-centre randomised controlled trial.

作者信息

Sayal Kapil, Wyatt Laura, Partlett Christopher, Ewart Colleen, Bhardwaj Anupam, Dubicka Bernadka, Marshall Tamsin, Gledhill Julia, Lang Alexandra, Sprange Kirsty, Thomson Louise, Moody Sebastian, Holt Grace, Bould Helen, Upton Clare, Keane Matthew, Cox Edward, James Marilyn, Montgomery Alan

机构信息

Unit of Mental Health & Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

Institute of Mental Health, Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Nottingham, UK.

出版信息

J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2025 Jun;66(6):805-820. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.14090. Epub 2025 Jan 7.

DOI:10.1111/jcpp.14090
PMID:39775729
原文链接:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12062850/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Standardised Diagnostic Assessment tools, such as the Development and Well-Being Assessment (DAWBA), may aid detection and diagnosis of emotional disorders but there is limited real-world evidence of their clinical or cost effectiveness.

METHODS

We conducted a multicentre, two-arm parallel group randomised controlled trial in eight large National Health Service Trusts in England providing multidisciplinary specialist Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS). Participants (5-17 year-olds with emotional difficulties referred to CAMHS) were randomly assigned (1:1), following referral receipt, to either receive the DAWBA and assessment-as-usual (intervention group) or assessment-as-usual (control group). Data were self-reported by participants (parents and/or young person, depending on age) at baseline, 6- and 12-month post-randomisation and collected from clinical records up to 18 months post-randomisation. The primary outcome was a clinician-made diagnosis decision about the presence of an emotional disorder within 12 months of randomisation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN15748675.

RESULTS

In total, 1,225 children and young people (58% female sex) were randomised (615 intervention; 610 control). Adherence to the intervention (full/partial completion) was 80% (494/615). At 12 months, 68 (11%) participants in the intervention group received an emotional disorder diagnosis versus 72 (12%) in the control group (adjusted risk ratio (RR) 0.94 [95% CI 0.70, 1.28]). The intervention was not cost effective. There was no evidence of any differences between groups for service-related or participant-reported secondary outcomes, for example, CAMHS acceptance of the index referral (intervention 277 (45%) versus control 262 (43%); RR: 1.06 [95% CI: 0.94, 1.19]) was similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

As delivered in this pragmatic trial, we found no evidence for the effectiveness or cost effectiveness of using a Standardised Diagnostic Assessment tool in aiding the detection of emotional disorders or clinical outcomes in clinically referred children and young people. Despite regular efforts to encourage clinicians to view the DAWBA report and consider its findings as part of assessment and diagnosis, we did not collect data on usage and therefore cannot confirm the extent to which clinicians did this. As a pragmatic trial that aimed to test the effectiveness of incorporating the DAWBA into usual practice and clinical care, our study found that, in the format as delivered in this trial, there was no impact on diagnosis or clinical outcomes.

摘要

背景

标准化诊断评估工具,如发育与幸福评估(DAWBA),可能有助于情感障碍的检测和诊断,但在现实世界中,关于其临床效果或成本效益的证据有限。

方法

我们在英格兰的八个大型国民健康服务信托机构进行了一项多中心、双臂平行组随机对照试验,这些机构提供多学科专科儿童和青少年心理健康服务(CAMHS)。参与者(年龄在5至17岁、有情感问题并被转诊至CAMHS的儿童)在收到转诊后被随机分配(1:1),要么接受DAWBA和常规评估(干预组),要么接受常规评估(对照组)。数据由参与者(父母和/或青少年,取决于年龄)在基线、随机分组后6个月和12个月时自行报告,并从随机分组后长达18个月的临床记录中收集。主要结局是临床医生在随机分组后12个月内对是否存在情感障碍做出的诊断决定。

试验注册

ISRCTN15748675。

结果

总共1225名儿童和青少年(58%为女性)被随机分组(615名干预组;610名对照组)。干预的依从性(完全/部分完成)为80%(494/615)。在12个月时,干预组有68名(11%)参与者被诊断为情感障碍,而对照组有72名(12%)(调整风险比(RR)0.94[95%CI 0.70, 1.28])。该干预措施不具有成本效益。在与服务相关或参与者报告的次要结局方面,没有证据表明两组之间存在任何差异,例如,CAMHS对索引转诊的接受情况(干预组277例(45%)对对照组262例(43%);RR:1.06[95%CI:0.94, 1.19])在两组之间相似。

结论

在这项务实试验中,我们没有发现证据表明使用标准化诊断评估工具在帮助检测临床转诊的儿童和青少年的情感障碍或临床结局方面有效或具有成本效益。尽管我们经常努力鼓励临床医生查看DAWBA报告并将其结果作为评估和诊断的一部分加以考虑,但我们没有收集关于使用情况的数据,因此无法确认临床医生在多大程度上做到了这一点。作为一项旨在测试将DAWBA纳入常规实践和临床护理有效性的务实试验,我们的研究发现,以本试验所采用的形式,其对诊断或临床结局没有影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af15/12062850/06b445efaa90/JCPP-66-805-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af15/12062850/06b445efaa90/JCPP-66-805-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af15/12062850/06b445efaa90/JCPP-66-805-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
The clinical and cost effectiveness of a STAndardised DIagnostic Assessment for children and adolescents with emotional difficulties: the STADIA multi-centre randomised controlled trial.针对有情绪问题的儿童和青少年的标准化诊断评估的临床及成本效益:STADIA多中心随机对照试验
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2025 Jun;66(6):805-820. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.14090. Epub 2025 Jan 7.
2
STAndardised DIagnostic Assessment for children and young people with emotional difficulties (STADIA): protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial.STAndardised DIagnostic Assessment for children and young people with emotional difficulties (STADIA): protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial. 标准化儿童和青少年情绪障碍诊断评估(STADIA):一项多中心随机对照试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 May 11;12(5):e053043. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053043.
3
A randomised controlled multicentre trial of treatments for adolescent anorexia nervosa including assessment of cost-effectiveness and patient acceptability - the TOuCAN trial.一项针对青少年神经性厌食症治疗方法的随机对照多中心试验,包括成本效益评估和患者可接受性评估——TOuCAN 试验。
Health Technol Assess. 2010 Mar;14(15):1-98. doi: 10.3310/hta14150.
4
Barriers and facilitators to using standardised diagnostic assessments in child and adolescent mental health services: a qualitative process evaluation of the STADIA trial.儿童和青少年心理健康服务中使用标准化诊断评估的障碍与促进因素:STADIA试验的定性过程评估
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2025 Mar 18. doi: 10.1007/s00787-025-02678-w.
5
A pragmatic randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of family therapy versus treatment as usual for young people seen after second or subsequent episodes of self-harm: the Self-Harm Intervention - Family Therapy (SHIFT) trial.家庭治疗与常规治疗对二次或多次自伤后年轻人的实用随机对照试验和经济评价:自伤干预 - 家庭治疗(SHIFT)试验。
Health Technol Assess. 2018 Mar;22(12):1-222. doi: 10.3310/hta22120.
6
Clinical effectiveness of the psychological therapy Mental Health Intervention for Children with Epilepsy in addition to usual care compared with assessment-enhanced usual care alone: a multicentre, randomised controlled clinical trial in the UK.在英国进行的一项多中心、随机对照临床试验显示,在常规治疗的基础上增加心理治疗(儿童癫痫心理干预)与仅增强评估的常规治疗相比,对儿童的临床疗效更好。
Lancet. 2024 Mar 30;403(10433):1254-1266. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02791-5. Epub 2024 Mar 7.
7
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
8
An intervention for parents with severe personality difficulties whose children have mental health problems: a feasibility RCT.一项针对有严重人格障碍且其子女有心理健康问题的父母的干预措施:一项可行性 RCT 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Mar;24(14):1-188. doi: 10.3310/hta24140.
9
An intervention to improve the quality of life in children of parents with serious mental illness: the Young SMILES feasibility RCT.改善严重精神疾病父母子女生活质量的干预措施:Young SMILES 可行性 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Nov;24(59):1-136. doi: 10.3310/hta24590.
10
A video-feedback parenting intervention to prevent enduring behaviour problems in at-risk children aged 12-36 months: the Healthy Start, Happy Start RCT.视频反馈式育儿干预预防 12-36 月龄高危儿童持久行为问题:健康启动,快乐启动 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 May;25(29):1-84. doi: 10.3310/hta25290.

引用本文的文献

1
Debate: Are we overpathologising young people's mental health? Research shows otherwise - mental health conditions are not being recognised or diagnosed in healthcare settings.辩论:我们是否过度诊断年轻人的心理健康问题?研究表明并非如此——心理健康状况在医疗环境中未得到识别或诊断。
Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2025 Sep;30(3):305-307. doi: 10.1111/camh.70019. Epub 2025 Jul 31.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating the development and well-being assessment (DAWBA) in pediatric anxiety and depression.评估儿童焦虑症和抑郁症中的发育与幸福感评估(DAWBA)。
Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2024 Jan 20;18(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s13034-023-00696-7.
2
The multifaceted consequences and economic costs of child anxiety problems: A systematic review and meta-analysis.儿童焦虑问题的多方面后果及经济成本:一项系统综述与荟萃分析。
JCPP Adv. 2023 Apr 21;3(3):e12149. doi: 10.1002/jcv2.12149. eCollection 2023 Sep.
3
STAndardised DIagnostic Assessment for children and young people with emotional difficulties (STADIA): protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
STAndardised DIagnostic Assessment for children and young people with emotional difficulties (STADIA): protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial. 标准化儿童和青少年情绪障碍诊断评估(STADIA):一项多中心随机对照试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 May 11;12(5):e053043. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053043.
4
Predictors of child and adolescent mental health treatment outcome.儿童和青少年心理健康治疗结果的预测因素。
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Mar 31;22(1):229. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-03837-y.
5
The effect of the Development and Well-Being Assessment as an adjunct to standard referral letters on referral decisions by child and adolescent mental health services - a randomized feasibility trial.发育与幸福评估作为标准转诊信的辅助手段对儿童和青少年心理健康服务转诊决策的影响——一项随机可行性试验。
Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2023 Apr;28(2):434-449. doi: 10.1177/13591045221081384. Epub 2022 Mar 25.
6
Innovations in Practice: Feasibility of the development and well-being assessment as an adjunct to clinical assessment in child and adolescent mental health services.实践中的创新:在儿童和青少年心理健康服务中,将发展与幸福感评估作为临床评估辅助手段的可行性。
Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2014 May;19(2):142-146. doi: 10.1111/camh.12017. Epub 2013 Feb 13.
7
Measurement Issues: Is standardised diagnostic assessment feasible as an adjunct to clinical practice? A systematic review.测量问题:标准化诊断评估作为临床实践的辅助手段是否可行?一项系统综述。
Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2016 Feb;21(1):51-63. doi: 10.1111/camh.12089. Epub 2015 Mar 11.
8
Measurement Issues: Depression measures in children and adolescents.测量问题:儿童和青少年的抑郁测量
Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2015 Nov;20(4):230-241. doi: 10.1111/camh.12106. Epub 2015 Apr 29.
9
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Adolescent Depression and Long-Term Psychosocial Outcomes.系统评价和荟萃分析:青少年抑郁与长期心理社会结局
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2019 Jan;58(1):72-79. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2018.07.896. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
10
Annual research review: Optimal outcomes of child and adolescent mental illness.年度研究综述:儿童和青少年精神疾病的最佳治疗效果
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2015 Mar;56(3):324-41. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12371. Epub 2014 Dec 12.