Department of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, The 960th Hospital of the PLA Joint Logistics Support Force (Former Jinan Military General Hospital of People's Liberation Army), Jinan, China.
BMC Surg. 2022 May 11;22(1):173. doi: 10.1186/s12893-022-01609-9.
To compare the surgical outcomes between the transoral-vestibular robotic thyroidectomy (TOVRT) and bilateral axillo-breast approach robotic thyroidectomy (BABART).
A total of 99 patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma but no distant metastasis were enrolled in this study from May 2020 to April 2021. Lobectomy or total thyroidectomy with central lymph node dissection were performed in all cases. All 99 patients were received an ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration biopsy prior to surgical intervention, out of which 49 patients underwent TOVRT, while rest 50 patients underwent BABART. During the procedure, intraoperative neuromonitoring system was used and all recurrent laryngeal nerves (RLNs) were preserved, additionally for TOVRT procedure, three intraoral ports or right axillary fold incision was used to allow for fine countertraction of tissue for radical oncological dissection. The clinical data including age, gender, height, weight, BMI, primary tumor size, number of central lymph node removed, central lymph node metastasis, operating time, total hospital stays, postoperative hospital stays, total postoperative drainage volume, postoperative pain score, cosmetic effect and complications were recorded and analyzed.
There were no significant differences in gender, height, weight, BMI and removed central lymph nodes between the two groups (P > 0.05). Patients accepted TOVRT were younger and had smaller primary tumor size than those who accepted BABART. The TOVRT group had a longer surgical time than the BABART group, but with smaller postoperative drainage volume and superior cosmetic effect (under visual analogue scale, VAS) (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in lymph node metastasis, hospital stay and postoperative pain score (under numerical rating scale, NRS) between the two groups (P > 0.05). Last but not least, certain peculiar complications were observed in TOVRT group: paresthesia of the lower lip and the chin (one case), surgical site infection (one case) and skin burn (one case).
Transoral-vestibular robotic thyroidectomy is safe and feasible for certain patients, which could be considered an alternative approach for patients who require no scarring on their neck.
比较经口前庭机器人甲状腺切除术(TOVRT)与双侧腋窝入路机器人甲状腺切除术(BABART)的手术效果。
本研究纳入了 2020 年 5 月至 2021 年 4 月期间 99 例无远处转移的甲状腺乳头状癌患者。所有患者均接受了甲状腺叶切除术或全甲状腺切除术及中央淋巴结清扫术。所有 99 例患者在手术干预前均接受了超声引导下细针抽吸活检,其中 49 例行 TOVRT,50 例行 BABART。术中使用了术中神经监测系统,并保留了所有喉返神经(RLN),此外,对于 TOVRT 手术,使用了三个口腔内端口或右腋窝褶皱切口,以允许对组织进行精细的反向牵拉,进行根治性肿瘤学解剖。记录并分析了两组患者的临床资料,包括年龄、性别、身高、体重、BMI、原发肿瘤大小、中央淋巴结清扫数目、中央淋巴结转移、手术时间、总住院时间、术后住院时间、总术后引流量、术后疼痛评分、美容效果和并发症。
两组患者的性别、身高、体重、BMI 和切除的中央淋巴结数目无统计学差异(P>0.05)。接受 TOVRT 的患者年龄较小,原发肿瘤较小。TOVRT 组的手术时间长于 BABART 组,但术后引流量较小,美容效果(视觉模拟评分,VAS)较好(P<0.05)。两组患者的淋巴结转移、住院时间和术后疼痛评分(数字评分量表,NRS)无统计学差异(P>0.05)。最后,TOVRT 组还观察到一些特殊的并发症:下唇和颏部感觉异常(1 例)、手术部位感染(1 例)和皮肤灼伤(1 例)。
经口前庭机器人甲状腺切除术对于某些患者是安全可行的,对于那些要求颈部无疤痕的患者,可以考虑作为一种替代方法。