Department of International Health, The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Krieger School of Arts and Sciences, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 May 11;22(1):629. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07942-2.
Delays in the implementation of evidence-based practices are significant and ubiquitous, compromising health outcomes. Resistance to change is a key factor in hindering adoption and integration of new evidence-based interventions. This study seeks to understand the impact of exposure to HIV testing within a research context on provider attitudes towards HIV counselling and testing (HCT) in emergency departments (ED).
This is a pre-and-post study design measuring the effect of a new ED-based HCT intervention, conducted by lay counsellors, on provider attitudes in Eastern Cape, South Africa. A validated, anonymized, 7-item survey was self-completed by routine care providers (physicians, nurses, and case managers). Questions were scored on a 5-point Likert scale with 5 consistently reflecting a positive attitude. Mean scores were calculated for each question and compared using a two-sample t-test to assess change in sample means for attitudes among providers surveyed before and after the intervention.
A total of 132 surveys were completed across three EDs. Majority of respondents were female (70.5%), 20-29 years old (37.9%), of African race (81.1%), nurses (39.4%), and practicing medicine for 0-4 years (37.9%). Pre-intervention, providers displayed a positive attitude towards 'the benefit of offering ED-based HCT to patients' (4.33), 'the ED offering HCT' (3.53), 'all ED patients receiving HCT' (3.42), 'concern about patient reaction to HCT' (3.26), and 'comfort with disclosing HCT results' (3.21); and a mildly negative attitude towards 'only high-risk ED patients receiving HCT' (2.68), and 'the burden of offering HCT in a clinical environment' (2.80). Post-intervention, provider attitudes improved significantly towards 'all ED patients receiving HCT' (3.86, p < 0.05), 'only high-risk ED patients receiving HCT' (2.30, p < 0.05), 'the burden of offering HCT in a clinical environment' (3.21, p < 0.05), and 'comfort with disclosing HCT results' (3.81, p < 0.05).
Controlled exposure to new practices with a structured implementation period can shift attitudes beginning a process of practice normalization. In our study, we observed improvements in provider attitudes regarding the benefits of HCT and the burden of offering HCT to all patients in the ED. Research activities may have a role in mitigating resistance to change and supporting intervention adoption.
证据实践的实施延迟是显著且普遍存在的,这会影响健康结果。对变革的抵制是阻碍新的基于证据的干预措施采用和整合的关键因素。本研究旨在了解在研究背景下接触艾滋病毒检测对急诊部门(ED)提供者对艾滋病毒咨询和检测(HCT)的态度的影响。
这是一项在南非东开普省进行的、由非专业咨询师实施的新的 ED 基于 HCT 干预措施的前后研究设计,测量了该措施对提供者态度的影响。常规护理提供者(医生、护士和个案经理)自行完成了一份经过验证的、匿名的、包含 7 个项目的调查。问题采用 5 点李克特量表进行评分,5 分始终反映出积极的态度。为每个问题计算平均分数,并使用两样本 t 检验比较调查前和干预后提供者的样本平均值,以评估态度的变化。
共有 132 份问卷在三个 ED 完成。大多数受访者是女性(70.5%),年龄在 20-29 岁(37.9%),非洲裔(81.1%),护士(39.4%),行医 0-4 年(37.9%)。在干预前,提供者对“为患者提供 ED 基于 HCT 的益处”(4.33)、“ED 提供 HCT”(3.53)、“所有 ED 患者接受 HCT”(3.42)、“对患者对 HCT 的反应的担忧”(3.26)和“对披露 HCT 结果的舒适程度”(3.21)表现出积极的态度;对“仅接受高风险 ED 患者接受 HCT”(2.68)和“在临床环境中提供 HCT 的负担”(2.80)的态度则略为消极。干预后,提供者对“所有 ED 患者接受 HCT”(3.86,p<0.05)、“仅接受高风险 ED 患者接受 HCT”(2.30,p<0.05)、“在临床环境中提供 HCT 的负担”(3.21,p<0.05)和“对披露 HCT 结果的舒适程度”(3.81,p<0.05)的态度显著改善。
对新实践的受控接触与结构化的实施阶段相结合,可以改变态度,开始实践规范化的过程。在我们的研究中,我们观察到提供者对 HCT 的益处和向 ED 所有患者提供 HCT 的负担的态度有所改善。研究活动可能在减轻对变革的抵制和支持干预措施的采用方面发挥作用。