Department of Surgery, North Cumbria Integrated Care, Carlisle, UK.
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2022 May;32(5):575-580. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2022.05.575.
To determine the primary and secondary outcomes of patients with complicated acute pancreatitis (CAP) of moderate to severe intensity managed by using the hub-and-spoke model.
An observational study.
Department of Surgery, North Cumbria Integrated Care, Carlisle, UK, from January 2014 to December 2018.
Retrospective analysis of 496 episodes of acute pancreatitis managed in 405 patients was done. Data for demographic features and clinical outcomes were analysed. In patients with recurrent admissions, only index admission was considered for analysis. Complicated acute pancreatitis was defined by using the revised Atlanta classification and included all the acute pancreatitis patients with local and or systemic complications. Results: The frequency of CAP was 21.7% (88/405). The mean patients' age was 62.11 ± 17.90 years. The intensive therapy unit (ITU) admission rate was 33% (n = 29), whereas the overall intervention rate was 43.2% (n = 38). The in-hospital mortality rate was 10.2% (n = 9), and the overall mortality rate was 14.8% (n = 13). A comparative analysis of clinical outcomes according to the revised Atlanta classification showed that the rate of complications, need for ITU admission, duration of hospital stay, in-hospital mortality and overall mortality were significantly higher in patients with moderately severe AP (MSAP) and severe AP (SAP).
The rate of progression from mild AP to MSAP and SAP remains high. Patients with CAP are at higher risk of ITU admission, prolonged hospital stay, in-hospital mortality and overall mortality. To improve clinical outcomes, the progression of AP to severer forms should be prevented by developing newer strategies, and in cases where complications have already developed, the mortality rate needs to be improved by developing innovative treatment modalities.
Acute pancreatitis, Complicated acute pancreatitis, Revised Atlanta classification, Morbidity, Mortality, Survival analysis, Hub and spoke model.
确定采用枢纽辐射模型治疗中重度复杂急性胰腺炎(CAP)患者的主要和次要结局。
观察性研究。
英国卡莱尔市北坎布里亚综合保健署外科系,2014 年 1 月至 2018 年 12 月。
对 405 例患者的 496 例急性胰腺炎发作进行回顾性分析。分析人口统计学特征和临床结局数据。对于反复入院的患者,仅考虑索引入院进行分析。采用修订后的亚特兰大分类法定义复杂急性胰腺炎,包括所有伴有局部和/或全身并发症的急性胰腺炎患者。结果:CAP 的发生率为 21.7%(88/405)。患者的平均年龄为 62.11±17.90 岁。重症监护病房(ITU)入院率为 33%(n=29),而总干预率为 43.2%(n=38)。住院死亡率为 10.2%(n=9),总死亡率为 14.8%(n=13)。根据修订后的亚特兰大分类法对临床结局进行的比较分析显示,中重度急性胰腺炎(MSAP)和重度急性胰腺炎(SAP)患者的并发症发生率、需要 ITU 入院、住院时间、住院死亡率和总死亡率均显著更高。
从轻度 AP 进展为 MSAP 和 SAP 的发生率仍然很高。CAP 患者 ITU 入院、住院时间延长、住院死亡率和总死亡率的风险更高。为了改善临床结局,应通过制定新策略来防止 AP 进展为更严重的形式,并且在已经发生并发症的情况下,需要通过开发创新的治疗方法来提高死亡率。
急性胰腺炎,复杂急性胰腺炎,修订后的亚特兰大分类法,发病率,死亡率,生存分析,枢纽辐射模型。