Melvin Ryan L, Broyles Matthew G, Duggan Elizabeth W, John Sonia, Smith Andrew D, Berkowitz Dan E
Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.
Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.
Front Digit Health. 2022 Apr 25;4:872675. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.872675. eCollection 2022.
As implementation of artificial intelligence grows more prevalent in perioperative medicine, a clinician's ability to distinguish differentiating aspects of these algorithms is critical. There are currently numerous marketing and technical terms to describe these algorithms with little standardization. Additionally, the need to communicate with algorithm developers is paramount to actualize effective and practical implementation. Of particular interest in these discussions is the extent to which the output or predictions of algorithms and tools are understandable by medical practitioners. This work proposes a simple nomenclature that is intelligible to both clinicians and developers for quickly describing the interpretability of model results. There are three high-level categories: , and . To demonstrate the applicability and utility of this terminology, these terms were applied to the artificial intelligence and machine-learning-based products that have gained Food and Drug Administration approval. During this review and categorization process, 22 algorithms were found with perioperative utility (in a database of 70 total algorithms), and 12 of these had publicly available citations. The primary aim of this work is to establish a common nomenclature that will expedite and simplify descriptions of algorithm requirements from clinicians to developers and explanations of appropriate model use and limitations from developers to clinicians.
随着人工智能在围手术期医学中的应用越来越普遍,临床医生区分这些算法不同方面的能力至关重要。目前有众多营销和技术术语来描述这些算法,但标准化程度很低。此外,与算法开发者沟通对于实现有效和实际的应用至关重要。在这些讨论中,特别值得关注的是医学从业者对算法和工具的输出或预测的理解程度。这项工作提出了一种简单的命名法,临床医生和开发者都能理解,用于快速描述模型结果的可解释性。有三个高级类别: ,以及 。为了证明该术语的适用性和实用性,这些术语被应用于已获得美国食品药品监督管理局批准的基于人工智能和机器学习的产品。在这个审查和分类过程中,发现22种算法具有围手术期应用价值(在总共70种算法的数据库中),其中12种有公开可用的引用文献。这项工作的主要目的是建立一种通用的命名法,以加快并简化从临床医生到开发者对算法要求的描述,以及从开发者到临床医生对适当模型使用和局限性的解释。