AlRadini Faten, Ahmad Nadeem, Ejaz Kahloon Lubna, Javaid Amrah, Al Zamil Norah
Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Medicine, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Department of Basic Sciences, College of Medicine, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2022 May 5;13:449-455. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S360333. eCollection 2022.
To measure the readiness for self-directed learning in medical students for the evaluation of self-directed learning in the study population.
The survey was conducted in undergraduate students. The instrument used was Fisher's readiness scale comprising of self-management, desire for learning, and self-control domains. The data were analyzed by Mann-Whitney -test and bivariate and partial correlations. The results were compared with the reported ones.
Total students surveyed were 300. Of these, 96 responded - 73 (76%) of preclinical and 23 (24%) of clinical classes. The mean readiness score was 124. The mean domains' scores for self-management, desire for learning, and self-control were 38, 38, and 48, respectively. The preclinical group had a mean score of 122 for readiness, 37 for self-management and desire for learning each, and 48 for self-control. The clinical group's scores were 129, 40, and 49, respectively. Preclinical and clinical groups differed significantly in self-management domain (P = 0.03). The difference was not significant in desire for learning (P = 0.08), self-control domains (P = 0.40) and readiness score (P = 0.12). The domains of self-control and desire for learning had a positive correlation if self-management was controlled, and self-control and self-management had a positive correlation if desire for learning was controlled (P < 0.05).
The measurement of readiness for self-directed learning helps in knowing the true value of self-directed learning in a particular setting. Relatively lower scores in our study mean self-directed learning alone cannot be relied upon to achieve optimum students' learning. There is also a need for implementing strategies that will help students in improving their readiness for independent learning.
测量医学生自我导向学习的准备情况,以便评估研究人群中的自我导向学习。
对本科生进行调查。所使用的工具是费舍尔准备度量表,包括自我管理、学习愿望和自我控制领域。数据采用曼-惠特尼检验、双变量和偏相关分析。将结果与已报道的结果进行比较。
共调查了300名学生。其中,96人做出回应——73人(76%)来自临床前课程,23人(24%)来自临床课程。准备度平均得分为124分。自我管理、学习愿望和自我控制领域的平均得分分别为38分、38分和48分。临床前组的准备度平均得分为122分,自我管理和学习愿望各为37分,自我控制为48分。临床组的得分分别为129分、40分和49分。临床前组和临床组在自我管理领域存在显著差异(P = 0.03)。在学习愿望(P = 0.08)、自我控制领域(P = 0.40)和准备度得分(P = 0.12)方面差异不显著。如果控制自我管理,自我控制和学习愿望领域呈正相关;如果控制学习愿望,自我控制和自我管理呈正相关(P < 0.05)。
自我导向学习准备情况的测量有助于了解特定环境下自我导向学习的真实价值。我们研究中相对较低的分数意味着仅靠自我导向学习无法实现学生的最佳学习效果。还需要实施有助于学生提高自主学习准备度的策略。