Li Xingjie, Li Dongbo, Yan Zhenning, Ao Yansong
School of Agriculture and Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Shanghai 200240 China
RSC Adv. 2018 Oct 1;8(58):33523-33533. doi: 10.1039/c8ra06758a. eCollection 2018 Sep 24.
Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) have been extensively investigated in combination remediation with plants in heavy metal contaminated soil. However, being biosorbent, few studies of live and dead cells of PGPR have been undertaken. Meanwhile, the application of live or dead biomass for the removal of heavy metals continues to be debated. Therefore, this study uses living and non-living biosorbents of GX_5, sp. GX_15, and sp. GX_31 to compare their Cd(ii) adsorption capacities by SEM-EDX, FTIR, and adsorption experiments. In the present study, whether the cells were living or dead and whatever the initial Cd(ii) concentration was, removal efficiency and adsorption capacity can be arranged as GX_31 > GX_15 > GX_5 ( < 0.05). However, removal efficiency in live and dead biosorbents was quite different and it greatly affected by the initial Cd(ii) concentrations. The dead cells exhibited a higher adsorption capacity than the live cells of GX_31. Nevertheless, for GX_5 and GX_15, the loading capacity of the non-living biomass was stronger than that of the living biomass at 20 mg L of Cd(ii), but the capacity was similar at 100 mg L of Cd(ii). Minor changes of spectra were found after autoclaving and it seemed that more functional groups of the dead biosorbent were involved in Cd(ii) binding by FTIR analysis, which also illustrated that the hydroxyl, amino, amide, and carboxyl groups played an important role in complexation with Cd(ii). Based on these findings, we concluded that the dead cells were more potent for Cd(ii) remediation, especially for GX_31.
植物促生根际细菌(PGPR)已在重金属污染土壤中与植物联合修复方面得到广泛研究。然而,作为生物吸附剂,对PGPR活细胞和死细胞的研究较少。同时,使用活生物质或死生物质去除重金属仍存在争议。因此,本研究使用GX_5菌、GX_15菌和GX_31菌的活生物吸附剂和非活生物吸附剂,通过扫描电子显微镜-能谱仪(SEM-EDX)、傅里叶变换红外光谱仪(FTIR)和吸附实验比较它们对Cd(ii)的吸附能力。在本研究中,无论细胞是活的还是死的,也无论初始Cd(ii)浓度如何,去除效率和吸附能力的排序均为GX_31 > GX_15 > GX_5(P < 0.05)。然而,活生物吸附剂和死生物吸附剂的去除效率差异很大,且受初始Cd(ii)浓度的显著影响。GX_31菌的死细胞比活细胞表现出更高的吸附能力。然而,对于GX_5菌和GX_15菌,在Cd(ii)浓度为20 mg/L时,非活生物质的负载能力强于活生物质,但在Cd(ii)浓度为100 mg/L时,两者能力相似。高压灭菌后发现光谱有微小变化,通过傅里叶变换红外光谱分析似乎表明更多死生物吸附剂的官能团参与了与Cd(ii)的结合,这也说明羟基、氨基、酰胺基和羧基在与Cd(ii)络合中起重要作用。基于这些发现,我们得出结论,死细胞对Cd(ii)修复更有效,尤其是对于GX_31菌。