• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔穿刺术:使用RenovaRP®泵更快更简便。

Paracentesis: Faster and easier using the RenovaRP® pump.

作者信息

Weber Shane N, Al-Dulaimi Ragheed, Quencer Keith B, Kaufman Claire, Cizman Ziga, Eiswirth Preston, Brown Karen T

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.

出版信息

Diagn Interv Radiol. 2022 Mar;28(2):166-170. doi: 10.5152/dir.2022.20991.

DOI:10.5152/dir.2022.20991
PMID:35548901
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12278930/
Abstract

PURPOSE Paracentesis is commonly performed in interventional radiology practice, and large volume paracentesis (LVP) using wall suction can take up to an hour to complete, placing significant stress on room and resource time. As the number of LVP procedures performed by Interventional Radiologists continue to increase, this study was undertaken to analyze the impact of the RenovaRP® Paracentesis Management System (GI Supply) on procedure time and patient satisfaction. METHODS Between March 9, 2020 and May 29, 2020, procedural data and patient satisfaction was collected as part of a practice quality improvement project and retrospectively analyzed on 39 sequential paracenteses performed with wall suction prior to acquiring the RenovaRP® system and subsequently on 42 paracenteses performed with use of the device. RESULTS A substantially higher fluid flow rate was found using the RenovaRP® system compared to wall suction, 237.2 mL/min vs. 108.6 mL/min (P < .001). This resulted in a significant decrease in procedure room time from 53 min to 31 min (P < .001). There was associated improvement in the patient experience during paracentesis. CONCLUSION The RenovaRP® decreases procedure time for LVP with improvement in the patient experience during paracentesis.

摘要

目的

腹腔穿刺术在介入放射学实践中很常见,使用墙壁吸引器进行大量腹腔穿刺术(LVP)可能需要长达一小时才能完成,这给空间和资源时间带来了巨大压力。随着介入放射科医生进行的LVP手术数量持续增加,本研究旨在分析RenovaRP®腹腔穿刺管理系统(GI Supply)对手术时间和患者满意度的影响。方法:在2020年3月9日至2020年5月29日期间,收集手术数据和患者满意度作为实践质量改进项目的一部分,并对在获得RenovaRP®系统之前使用墙壁吸引器进行的39例连续腹腔穿刺术以及随后使用该设备进行的42例腹腔穿刺术进行回顾性分析。结果:与墙壁吸引相比,使用RenovaRP®系统发现液体流速显著更高,分别为237.2 mL/分钟和108.6 mL/分钟(P <.001)。这导致手术室时间从53分钟显著减少到31分钟(P <.001)。腹腔穿刺术期间患者体验也有相关改善。结论:RenovaRP®减少了LVP的手术时间,并改善了腹腔穿刺术期间的患者体验。

相似文献

1
Paracentesis: Faster and easier using the RenovaRP® pump.腹腔穿刺术:使用RenovaRP®泵更快更简便。
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2022 Mar;28(2):166-170. doi: 10.5152/dir.2022.20991.
2
Treatment for ascites in adults with decompensated liver cirrhosis: a network meta-analysis.失代偿期肝硬化成人腹水的治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 16;1(1):CD013123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013123.pub2.
3
Palliative long-term abdominal drains vs. large volume paracentesis for refractory ascites secondary to cirrhosis: protocol for a definitive randomised controlled trial (REDUCe2 study).姑息性长期腹腔引流与大量腹腔穿刺术治疗肝硬化继发性难治性腹水的比较:一项确定性随机对照试验方案(REDUCe2研究)
Trials. 2025 Jun 4;26(1):193. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-08873-z.
4
Innovative Solution for Treating Hypervolemia in Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease.治疗终末期肾病患者高血容量的创新解决方案。
Blood Purif. 2025;54(7):437-446. doi: 10.1159/000545121. Epub 2025 May 28.
5
Preexisting Diabetes and Pregnancy: An Endocrine Society and European Society of Endocrinology Joint Clinical Practice Guideline.孕前糖尿病与妊娠:内分泌学会和欧洲内分泌学会联合临床实践指南
Eur J Endocrinol. 2025 Jun 30;193(1):G1-G48. doi: 10.1093/ejendo/lvaf116.
6
Preexisting Diabetes and Pregnancy: An Endocrine Society and European Society of Endocrinology Joint Clinical Practice Guideline.糖尿病合并妊娠:内分泌学会与欧洲内分泌学会联合临床实践指南
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2025 Jul 13. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgaf288.
7
The effect of sample site and collection procedure on identification of SARS-CoV-2 infection.样本采集部位和采集程序对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)感染鉴定的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 16;12(12):CD014780. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014780.
8
Local anaesthesia for pain control in first trimester surgical abortion.在妊娠早期手术流产中进行局部麻醉以控制疼痛。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Feb 13;2(2):CD006712. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006712.pub3.
9
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound using SonoVue® (sulphur hexafluoride microbubbles) compared with contrast-enhanced computed tomography and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the characterisation of focal liver lesions and detection of liver metastases: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.超声造影使用声诺维®(六氟化硫微泡)与对比增强计算机断层扫描和对比增强磁共振成像在局灶性肝脏病变的特征描述和肝转移检测中的比较:系统评价和成本效益分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2013 Apr;17(16):1-243. doi: 10.3310/hta17160.
10
Management of urinary stones by experts in stone disease (ESD 2025).结石病专家对尿路结石的管理(2025年结石病专家共识)
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2025 Jun 30;97(2):14085. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2025.14085.

本文引用的文献

1
Disparities over Time in Volume, Day of the Week, and Patient Complexity between Paracentesis and Thoracentesis Procedures Performed by Radiologists versus Those Performed by Nonradiologists.放射科医生与非放射科医生行经皮穿刺抽液术与经皮穿刺引流术的量、操作日和患者复杂度的时间差异。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2019 Nov;30(11):1769-1778.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2019.04.015. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
2
Specialties performing paracentesis procedures at university hospitals: implications for training and certification.大学医院中进行腹腔穿刺术的专业:对培训和认证的影响。
J Hosp Med. 2014 Mar;9(3):162-8. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2153. Epub 2014 Feb 3.
3
Malignant ascites: A review of prognostic factors, pathophysiology and therapeutic measures.
恶性腹水:预后因素、病理生理学和治疗措施的综述。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2012 Apr 27;4(4):87-95. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v4.i4.87.
4
Diagnosis and therapy of ascites in liver cirrhosis.肝硬化腹水的诊断与治疗。
World J Gastroenterol. 2011 Mar 14;17(10):1237-48. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i10.1237.
5
National fluid shifts: fifteen-year trends in paracentesis and thoracentesis procedures.全国性的液体转移:十五年间经皮穿刺抽液术和胸腔穿刺术的趋势。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2010 Nov;7(11):859-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2010.04.013.