• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

主动承担责任对员工的晋升可能性和知名度有帮助还是有损害?基于主管地位视角的一项调查。

Does taking charge help or harm employees' promotability and visibility? An investigation from supervisors' status perspective.

作者信息

Xu Angela J, Loi Raymond, Chow Cheris W C

机构信息

School of Management.

Department of Management and Marketing.

出版信息

J Appl Psychol. 2023 Jan;108(1):53-71. doi: 10.1037/apl0000752. Epub 2022 May 12.

DOI:10.1037/apl0000752
PMID:35549285
Abstract

Taking charge is an important form of proactive behavior that sustains organizational survival and success. Despite considerable research on how to encourage employees to take charge, little is known about whether and when supervisors will evaluate those who take charge as more or less promotable and visible. Building on and extending the theoretical notion of dyadic complementary fit, we propose that, compared with lower status-goal-striving supervisors, higher status-goal-striving supervisors regard those who take charge as helping enhance their status in the organization more (i.e., a dyadic fit condition) and subsequently evaluate these employees as more promotable and visible. In a vignette-based experiment using 175 U.S.-based supervisors (Study 1), a two-wave field survey among 143 supervisor-subordinate dyads in a hotel (Study 2), and a three-wave survey among 294 supervisor-subordinate dyads in various organizations and industries in China (Study 3), we find support for our predictions. The findings have important implications for proactivity theory and practice. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

主动承担责任是一种维持组织生存与成功的重要积极行为形式。尽管在如何鼓励员工主动承担责任方面已有大量研究,但对于上级是否以及何时会将主动承担责任的员工评估为更具晋升潜力和更受关注,我们却知之甚少。基于并扩展二元互补匹配的理论概念,我们提出,与地位目标追求较低的上级相比,地位目标追求较高的上级认为主动承担责任的员工更有助于提升他们在组织中的地位(即二元匹配条件),并随后将这些员工评估为更具晋升潜力和更受关注。在一项针对175名美国上级的基于 vignette 的实验(研究1)、对一家酒店中143对上级 - 下属二元组进行的两波实地调查(研究2)以及对中国不同组织和行业中294对上级 - 下属二元组进行的三波调查(研究3)中,我们的预测得到了支持。这些发现对积极行为理论和实践具有重要意义。(PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2023 APA,保留所有权利)

相似文献

1
Does taking charge help or harm employees' promotability and visibility? An investigation from supervisors' status perspective.主动承担责任对员工的晋升可能性和知名度有帮助还是有损害?基于主管地位视角的一项调查。
J Appl Psychol. 2023 Jan;108(1):53-71. doi: 10.1037/apl0000752. Epub 2022 May 12.
2
Employee-Organization Pro-environmental Values Fit and Pro-environmental Behavior: The Role of Supervisors' Personal Values.员工-组织亲环境价值观契合与亲环境行为:主管个人价值观的作用。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2019 Apr;25(2):519-557. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-0007-z. Epub 2017 Dec 18.
3
Proactivity despite discouraging supervisors: The powerful role of prosocial motivation.积极主动,无视打压的上司:亲社会动机的强大作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2018 Jul;103(7):724-737. doi: 10.1037/apl0000301. Epub 2018 Mar 26.
4
When and why proactive employees get promoted: A trait activation perspective.积极主动的员工何时以及为何会获得晋升:特质激活视角。
Curr Psychol. 2022 Dec 28:1-12. doi: 10.1007/s12144-022-04142-3.
5
The Relation Between Supervisors' Big Five Personality Traits and Employees' Experiences of Abusive Supervision.管理者的大五人格特质与员工遭受虐待性监督经历之间的关系
Front Psychol. 2016 Feb 10;7:112. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00112. eCollection 2016.
6
Job Insecurity and Employees' Taking Charge Behaviors: Testing a Moderated Mediation Model.工作不安全感与员工主动行为:检验一个有调节的中介模型。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 8;19(2):696. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19020696.
7
Supervisors' power to deal with employees' inner resignation: How perceived power of the organization and the supervisor relate to employees' voluntary and enforced work behavior.主管处理员工内心离职情绪的权力:组织和主管的感知权力如何与员工的自愿和强制工作行为相关联。
Eur Manag J. 2021 Apr;39(2):260-269. doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2020.08.001. Epub 2020 Aug 7.
8
Too proactive to switch off: When taking charge drains resources and impairs detachment.过于主动以致无法关闭:当负责会耗尽资源并损害超脱。
J Occup Health Psychol. 2021 Apr;26(2):142-154. doi: 10.1037/ocp0000265. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
9
Just What I See? Implications of Congruence Between Supervisors' and Employees' Perceptions of Pay Justice for Employees' Work-Related Attitudes and Behaviors.我所看到的究竟是什么?主管与员工对薪酬公平性的认知一致性对员工工作相关态度和行为的影响。
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 9;11:2069. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02069. eCollection 2020.
10
Does voice endorsement by supervisors enhance or constrain voicer's personal initiative? Countervailing effects via feeling pride and feeling envied.主管的声音认可会增强还是限制发声者的个人主动性?通过感到自豪和感到羡慕产生的制衡效应。
J Appl Psychol. 2024 Sep;109(9):1408-1430. doi: 10.1037/apl0001191. Epub 2024 Apr 11.

引用本文的文献

1
The double-edged sword effect of leader mindfulness on employee taking charge.领导者正念对员工主动负责的双刃剑效应
BMC Psychol. 2025 Aug 30;13(1):990. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-03285-9.
2
Conceptual construction and scale development of leadership taking charge behavior in the Chinese cultural context.中国文化背景下领导担当行为的概念构建与量表开发
Front Psychol. 2025 Aug 6;16:1578771. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1578771. eCollection 2025.
3
The Impact of Empowering Leadership on Taking Charge Behaviors: Mediating Strengths Use and Moderating Ambition.
赋能型领导对主动负责行为的影响:优势利用的中介作用与抱负的调节作用。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Jul 24;14(8):633. doi: 10.3390/bs14080633.
4
Employee Proactive Personality and Career Growth: The Role of Proactive Behavior and Leader Proactive Personality.员工的积极主动人格与职业成长:积极行为和领导积极主动人格的作用。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Mar 21;14(3):256. doi: 10.3390/bs14030256.
5
How followers' perception of followership prototype-traits fit impacts their job performance: a moderated polynomial regression analysis.追随者对追随者原型特质契合度的认知如何影响其工作绩效:一项调节多项式回归分析
Front Psychol. 2024 Jan 8;14:1279568. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1279568. eCollection 2023.
6
Do people become more proactive at work as they grow older? Examining the mediating roles of intrinsic motivation, emotional exhaustion, and career aspiration.随着年龄的增长,人们在工作中会变得更积极主动吗?探究内在动机、情感耗竭和职业抱负的中介作用。
Front Psychol. 2023 Apr 27;14:1154861. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1154861. eCollection 2023.
7
The Influence of Emotional Labor of Service Employees on Customer Service Misbehavior and Repurchase Intention: The Role of Face.服务员工情绪劳动对顾客服务不当行为及重购意愿的影响:面子的作用
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2023 Apr 6;16:1109-1124. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S396775. eCollection 2023.
8
How and When Does Visionary Leadership Promote Followers' Taking Charge? The Roles of Inclusion of Leader in Self and Future Orientation.有远见的领导力如何以及何时促进追随者主动负责?领导者自我包容和未来导向的作用。
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2022 Jul 28;15:1917-1929. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S366939. eCollection 2022.