• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测成年早期的教育和社会情感结果:智力、个性和社会经济地位的作用。

Predicting educational and social-emotional outcomes in emerging adulthood from intelligence, personality, and socioeconomic status.

机构信息

Department of Education.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2022 Dec;123(6):1386-1406. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000421. Epub 2022 May 12.

DOI:10.1037/pspp0000421
PMID:35549304
Abstract

Emerging adulthood describes the developmental life stage between adolescence and adulthood, when young people gain important educational and social-emotional skills. Here, we tested to what extent intelligence and personality traits in adolescence, family socioeconomic status (SES), and their interplay predict educational (e.g., educational attainment, degree classification) and social-emotional outcomes (e.g., well-being, volunteering, substance use) in emerging adulthood in a U.K.-representative sample ( = 2,277). Intelligence, personality traits, and family SES accounted together for up to 23.5% ( = 9.7%) of the variance in emerging adulthood outcomes. Personality traits, including the Big Five, grit, curiosity, and ambition, were the most consistent and strongest predictors across outcomes, although intelligence was a better predictor of educational attainment. Intelligence, but not personality, accounted for a significant proportion of the associations between family SES with educational attainment, degree classification, behavior problems, aggression, and volunteering (16.4%-29.1%). Finally, intelligence, ambition, conscientiousness, curiosity, and openness were all stronger predictors of educational attainment at low compared to high SES levels. These significant interactions suggest that these traits may help compensate for family background disadvantage, although the corresponding effect sizes were small (² 0.4%-3%). Overall, our analyses suggested that there is moderate developmental continuity from adolescence to emerging adulthood. Our findings contribute to understanding the psychological characteristics and structural factors that help emerging adults to become resilient and productive members of society. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

成年初显期是指青少年向成年过渡的发展阶段,在此期间,年轻人获得重要的教育和社会情感技能。在这里,我们测试了青少年时期的智力和人格特质、家庭社会经济地位(SES)及其相互作用在多大程度上可以预测英国代表性样本(n = 2,277)成年初显期的教育(例如,教育程度、学位分类)和社会情感结果(例如,幸福感、志愿服务、物质使用)。智力、人格特质和家庭 SES 共同解释了成年初显期结果的 23.5%(=9.7%)的方差。人格特质,包括大五人格、坚毅、好奇心和野心,是预测结果最一致和最强的因素,尽管智力是教育程度的更好预测因素。智力,但不是人格,解释了家庭 SES 与教育程度、学位分类、行为问题、攻击性和志愿服务之间关联的很大一部分(16.4%-29.1%)。最后,智力、野心、尽责性、好奇心和开放性在 SES 水平较低的情况下,都是教育程度的更强预测因素。这些显著的交互作用表明,这些特质可能有助于弥补家庭背景的劣势,尽管相应的效应量很小(²0.4%-3%)。总体而言,我们的分析表明,从青少年到成年初显期存在中等程度的发展连续性。我们的研究结果有助于理解帮助成年初显期的年轻人成为有弹性和富有成效的社会成员的心理特征和结构因素。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2022 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
Predicting educational and social-emotional outcomes in emerging adulthood from intelligence, personality, and socioeconomic status.预测成年早期的教育和社会情感结果:智力、个性和社会经济地位的作用。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2022 Dec;123(6):1386-1406. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000421. Epub 2022 May 12.
2
Can personality traits and intelligence compensate for background disadvantage? Predicting status attainment in adulthood.人格特质和智力能否弥补背景劣势?预测成年后的地位获得情况。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2015 Sep;109(3):473-89. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000024. Epub 2014 Nov 17.
3
Do school grades matter for growing up? Testing the predictive validity of school performance for outcomes in emerging adulthood.学校成绩对成长重要吗?检验学校表现对成年早期结果的预测效度。
Dev Psychol. 2024 Apr;60(4):665-679. doi: 10.1037/dev0001548. Epub 2024 Feb 22.
4
Parental educational attainment and adult offspring personality: An intergenerational life span approach to the origin of adult personality traits.父母受教育程度与成年子女的人格:成年人格特质起源的代际毕生研究视角。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2017 Jul;113(1):144-166. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000137. Epub 2017 Mar 13.
5
Infant SES as a predictor of personality--is the association mediated by intelligence?婴儿社会经济地位作为人格的预测指标——这种关联是由智力介导的吗?
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 31;9(7):e103846. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103846. eCollection 2014.
6
An examination of genetic and environmental factors related to negative personality traits, educational attainment, and economic success.考察与消极人格特质、受教育程度和经济成功相关的遗传和环境因素。
Dev Psychol. 2021 Feb;57(2):191-199. doi: 10.1037/dev0001131.
7
Longitudinal predictors of adult socioeconomic attainment: the roles of socioeconomic status, academic competence, and mental health.成人社会经济地位的纵向预测因素:社会经济地位、学业能力和心理健康的作用。
Dev Psychopathol. 2011 Feb;23(1):315-24. doi: 10.1017/S0954579410000829.
8
The effects of socioeconomic status on personality development in adulthood and aging.社会经济地位对成年人和老年期人格发展的影响。
J Pers. 2024 Feb;92(1):243-260. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12801. Epub 2022 Dec 30.
9
Codevelopment of life goals and the Big Five personality traits across adulthood and old age.成年期和老年期生命目标与大五人格特质的共同发展。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2024 Feb;126(2):346-368. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000477. Epub 2023 Jul 27.
10
Socioeconomic differences in overweight and weight-related behaviors across adolescence and young adulthood: 10-year longitudinal findings from Project EAT.青少年和青年期超重及与体重相关行为的社会经济差异:“健康饮食”项目的10年纵向研究结果
Prev Med. 2016 Jun;87:194-199. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.03.007. Epub 2016 Mar 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Profiles of academic and cognitive abilities differ in younger and older children from diverse socioeconomic neighbourhoods.来自不同社会经济社区的年幼儿童和年长儿童在学业和认知能力方面的表现有所不同。
Aust J Psychol. 2024 Dec 9;77(1):2435318. doi: 10.1080/00049530.2024.2435318. eCollection 2025.
2
Using twin-pairs to assess potential bias in polygenic prediction of externalising behaviours across development.利用双胞胎对评估跨发育过程中外显行为多基因预测中的潜在偏差。
Mol Psychiatry. 2025 Feb 19. doi: 10.1038/s41380-025-02920-6.
3
Nonacademic predictors of China medical licensing examination.
中国医师资格考试的非学术性预测因素。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jan 14;25(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06652-7.
4
A legend in one's own mind: The link between ambition and leadership evaluations.自我心中的传奇:抱负与领导力评价之间的联系。
PNAS Nexus. 2024 Aug 20;3(8):pgae295. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae295. eCollection 2024 Aug.
5
Exploring the genetic prediction of academic underachievement and overachievement.探索学业成绩不佳与优异的基因预测。
NPJ Sci Learn. 2024 Jun 1;9(1):39. doi: 10.1038/s41539-024-00251-9.
6
Does Grit Compensate for Family Background Disadvantage in Predicting Mental Health Difficulties? A Longitudinal Study of Chinese Migrant and Urban Children.坚毅是否能弥补家庭背景劣势对心理健康问题的预测作用?对中国流动儿童和城市儿童的纵向研究。
J Youth Adolesc. 2024 Jun;53(6):1480-1497. doi: 10.1007/s10964-024-01953-4. Epub 2024 Mar 8.
7
Using twin-pairs to assess potential bias in polygenic prediction of externalising behaviours across development.利用双胞胎对评估跨发育阶段外化行为多基因预测中的潜在偏差。
medRxiv. 2023 Dec 14:2023.12.13.23299910. doi: 10.1101/2023.12.13.23299910.
8
Exploring Disparities in Behavioral Health Service Use in the Early Stages of the COVID-19 Pandemic.探索新冠疫情早期行为健康服务使用方面的差异
Int J Behav Med. 2024 Aug;31(4):549-562. doi: 10.1007/s12529-023-10192-z. Epub 2023 Jun 22.