• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自我心中的传奇:抱负与领导力评价之间的联系。

A legend in one's own mind: The link between ambition and leadership evaluations.

作者信息

Alzahawi Shilaan, Reit Emily S, Flynn Francis J

机构信息

Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, 655 Knight Way, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.

出版信息

PNAS Nexus. 2024 Aug 20;3(8):pgae295. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae295. eCollection 2024 Aug.

DOI:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae295
PMID:39166100
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11333923/
Abstract

Individuals who have more ambition-a persistent striving for success, attainment, and accomplishment-are more likely to become leaders. But are these ambitious individuals also more in leadership roles? We hypothesize that leader ambition is related to positive self-views of leader effectiveness that remain uncorroborated by relevant third-party actors. In a multiwave, preregistered study, we find evidence for this hypothesis using a sample of executives ( = 3,830 ratings of 472 leaders) who were rated by peers, subordinates, managers, and themselves on ten leadership competencies, including their ability to motivate others, manage collaborative work, coach and develop people, and present and communicate ideas. We consider the implications of our findings for both scholars and practitioners interested in leadership selection and development.

摘要

那些更有抱负——持续追求成功、成就和造诣的人——更有可能成为领导者。但这些有抱负的人担任领导角色的情况也更多吗?我们假设领导者的抱负与对领导者有效性的积极自我认知有关,而这种认知尚未得到相关第三方行为者的证实。在一项多阶段、预先注册的研究中,我们以一组高管(对472位领导者的3830次评价)为样本,就这一假设找到了证据。这些高管由同事、下属、经理以及他们自己就包括激励他人、管理协作工作、指导和培养人才以及展示和传达想法在内的十种领导能力进行评价。我们考虑了研究结果对关注领导力选拔与发展的学者和从业者的启示。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b923/11333923/d12c73a7a037/pgae295f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b923/11333923/2413f8abc10a/pgae295f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b923/11333923/d12c73a7a037/pgae295f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b923/11333923/2413f8abc10a/pgae295f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b923/11333923/d12c73a7a037/pgae295f2.jpg

相似文献

1
A legend in one's own mind: The link between ambition and leadership evaluations.自我心中的传奇:抱负与领导力评价之间的联系。
PNAS Nexus. 2024 Aug 20;3(8):pgae295. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae295. eCollection 2024 Aug.
2
Leaders' ambition and followers' cheating behavior: The role of performance pressure and leader identification.领导者的抱负与追随者的欺骗行为:绩效压力和领导者认同的作用
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 26;14:982328. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.982328. eCollection 2023.
3
[Charisma and leadership: new challenges for psychiatry].[魅力与领导力:精神病学面临的新挑战]
Encephale. 2013 Dec;39(6):445-51. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2012.10.006. Epub 2012 Dec 13.
4
The Humble Leader: Association of Discrepancies in Leader and Follower Ratings of Implementation Leadership With Organizational Climate in Mental Health.谦逊型领导者:心理健康领域中领导者与追随者对实施领导力的评价差异与组织氛围的关联
Psychiatr Serv. 2017 Feb 1;68(2):115-122. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201600062. Epub 2016 Oct 3.
5
Does what others can(not) see really matter? The relationship between leadership Arena-Reputation-Identity (LARI) model and leader effectiveness.他人能(否)看到的东西真的重要吗?领导能力的舞台-声誉-身份(LARI)模型与领导者效能之间的关系。
J Appl Psychol. 2025 Mar;110(3):404-431. doi: 10.1037/apl0001238. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
6
In praise of the incomplete leader.赞不完备的领导者。
Harv Bus Rev. 2007 Feb;85(2):92-100, 156.
7
Physician leadership.医师领导力。
Singapore Med J. 2007 Dec;48(12):1069-73.
8
Leader identity as an antecedent of the frequency and consistency of transformational, consideration, and abusive leadership behaviors.领导身份是变革型、关怀型和滥用型领导行为的频率和一致性的前因。
J Appl Psychol. 2012 Nov;97(6):1262-72. doi: 10.1037/a0029043. Epub 2012 Jun 25.
9
The young and the clueless.年轻且无知的人。
Harv Bus Rev. 2002 Dec;80(12):80-7, 133.
10
Boxed in by your inbox: Implications of daily e-mail demands for managers' leadership behaviors.被收件箱包围:每日电子邮件需求对管理者领导行为的影响。
J Appl Psychol. 2019 Jan;104(1):19-33. doi: 10.1037/apl0000343. Epub 2018 Sep 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Predicting educational and social-emotional outcomes in emerging adulthood from intelligence, personality, and socioeconomic status.预测成年早期的教育和社会情感结果:智力、个性和社会经济地位的作用。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2022 Dec;123(6):1386-1406. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000421. Epub 2022 May 12.
2
Reconciling female agentic advantage and disadvantage with the CADDIS measure of agency.协调女性代理优势和劣势与 CADDIS 代理衡量标准。
J Appl Psychol. 2022 Dec;107(12):2115-2148. doi: 10.1037/apl0000550. Epub 2022 Mar 17.
3
Opt-out choice framing attenuates gender differences in the decision to compete in the laboratory and in the field.
选择退出框架减弱了实验室和实地竞争决策中的性别差异。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Oct 19;118(42). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2108337118.
4
Narcissistic leaders: An asset or a liability? Leader visibility, follower responses, and group-level absenteeism.自恋型领导者:资产还是负债?领导者可见度、追随者反应和群体缺勤率。
J Appl Psychol. 2018 Jul;103(7):703-723. doi: 10.1037/apl0000298. Epub 2018 Mar 19.
5
The double-edged sword of leader charisma: Understanding the curvilinear relationship between charismatic personality and leader effectiveness.领导者魅力的双刃剑:理解魅力人格与领导效力之间的曲线关系。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2018 Jan;114(1):110-130. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000147. Epub 2017 May 29.
6
Risky business: When humor increases and decreases status.风险行为:幽默何时提升及降低地位。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2017 Mar;112(3):431-455. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000079. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
7
The Facial Appearance of CEOs: Faces Signal Selection but Not Performance.首席执行官的面部特征:面部传递出选拔信号,但与业绩无关。
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 27;11(7):e0159950. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159950. eCollection 2016.
8
Confidence intervals for population reliability coefficients: Evaluation of methods, recommendations, and software for composite measures.群体可靠性系数的置信区间:综合测量方法、建议和软件的评估。
Psychol Methods. 2016 Mar;21(1):69-92. doi: 10.1037/a0040086.
9
Individual differences in fundamental social motives.基本社会动机的个体差异。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2016 Jun;110(6):887-907. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000068. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
10
Is the desire for status a fundamental human motive? A review of the empirical literature.追求地位是人类的基本动机吗?对实证文献的回顾。
Psychol Bull. 2015 May;141(3):574-601. doi: 10.1037/a0038781. Epub 2015 Mar 16.