• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

国内/家庭杀人事件:实证证据的系统回顾。

Domestic/Family Homicide: A Systematic Review of Empirical Evidence.

机构信息

Nursing and Midwifery, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.

Department of Forensic Medicine, Monash University, Southbank, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

Trauma Violence Abuse. 2023 Jul;24(3):1908-1928. doi: 10.1177/15248380221082084. Epub 2022 May 12.

DOI:10.1177/15248380221082084
PMID:35549599
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Domestic/family homicide (D/FH) is a global social, economic and public health problem. To date, the research studies into risk factors associated with D/FH has largely focused on intimate partner homicide (IPH). A more contemporary approach recognizes that D/FH extends beyond the intimate partner relationship. This systematic review sought to identify and quantify the individual, relationship, community and societal factors in the empirical evidence literature on D/FH.

METHODS

Eight electronic databases were searched from January 1999 to December 2020. Published journal articles on studies of D/FH were included if the study included victims and/or perpetrator of D/FH, reported risk and/or protective factors associated with D/FH, reported primary data and was published in English. Factors were descriptively synthesized by the categories of the social ecological model and D/FH sub-type.

RESULTS

Three hundred and forty published articles met the inclusion criteria. From 1999 to 2020 the number of articles on D/FH increased globally from 10 to 40 respectively, declining to 23 in 2020. Almost half of the articles examined populations located in the Americas (160, 47.1%), predominately the United States and the majority of articles used quantitative designs (277, 81.5%). The forms of homicide more commonly studied were intimate partner (171, 50.3%), and filicide (98, 28.8%). Approximately 90% of articles reported individual victim and perpetrator factors, 64.7% examined relationship factors, 17.9% examined community factors and 15.6% examined societal factors.

CONCLUSION

To inform universal and targeted D/FH elimination and prevention strategies, more research across different regions and a greater emphasis on community and societal-level factors is needed.

摘要

背景

家庭/国内杀人(D/FH)是一个全球性的社会、经济和公共卫生问题。迄今为止,对与 D/FH 相关的风险因素的研究主要集中在亲密伴侣杀人(IPH)上。一种更为现代的方法认识到,D/FH 不仅限于亲密伴侣关系。本系统评价旨在确定和量化实证文献中与 D/FH 相关的个体、关系、社区和社会因素,并对其进行量化。

方法

从 1999 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月,我们对 8 个电子数据库进行了搜索。如果研究包括 D/FH 的受害者和/或犯罪者、报告与 D/FH 相关的风险和/或保护因素、报告原始数据且以英文发表,则将研究 D/FH 的已发表期刊文章纳入研究范围。根据社会生态模型和 D/FH 亚型的类别,对因素进行描述性综合。

结果

共有 340 篇已发表文章符合纳入标准。从 1999 年到 2020 年,全球关于 D/FH 的文章数量从 10 篇增加到 40 篇,2020 年降至 23 篇。几乎一半的文章研究了位于美洲的人群(160 篇,47.1%),主要是美国,大多数文章使用定量设计(277 篇,81.5%)。更常见的杀人形式是亲密伴侣(171 篇,50.3%)和杀亲(98 篇,28.8%)。大约 90%的文章报告了个体受害者和犯罪者因素,64.7%的文章研究了关系因素,17.9%的文章研究了社区因素,15.6%的文章研究了社会因素。

结论

为了为普及和有针对性的 D/FH 消除和预防策略提供信息,需要在不同地区开展更多研究,并更加重视社区和社会层面的因素。

相似文献

1
Domestic/Family Homicide: A Systematic Review of Empirical Evidence.国内/家庭杀人事件:实证证据的系统回顾。
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2023 Jul;24(3):1908-1928. doi: 10.1177/15248380221082084. Epub 2022 May 12.
2
The Perpetrator-Victim Relationship: An Important Clue in Understanding Intimate Partner Homicide in China.施害者-受害者关系:理解中国亲密伴侣杀人案的重要线索。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Aug;37(15-16):NP13446-NP13467. doi: 10.1177/08862605211005141. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
3
Explanatory Theories of Intimate Partner Homicide Perpetration: A Systematic Review.亲密伴侣杀人行为实施的解释性理论:系统综述。
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2022 Apr;23(2):408-427. doi: 10.1177/1524838020953800. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
4
The Validity and Reliability of Available Intimate Partner Homicide and Reassault Risk Assessment Tools: A Systematic Review.可用的亲密伴侣杀人及再攻击风险评估工具的有效性和可靠性:系统评价。
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2021 Jan;22(1):18-40. doi: 10.1177/1524838018821952. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
5
Intimate Partner Homicide of Adolescents.青少年亲密伴侣杀人事件。
JAMA Pediatr. 2019 Jun 1;173(6):571-577. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.0621.
6
Risk factors for intimate partner homicide in England and Wales.英格兰和威尔士亲密伴侣杀人案的风险因素。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Sep;30(5):e3086-e3095. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13753. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
7
Examining Attempted and Completed Intimate Partner Homicide: A Qualitative Synthesis.审视亲密伴侣杀人未遂与既遂案件:一项定性综合研究
Violence Vict. 2019 Dec 1;34(6):869-888. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-18-00128.
8
Risk Factors for Child Death During an Intimate Partner Homicide: A Case-Control Study.亲密伴侣杀人案中儿童死亡的风险因素:一项病例对照研究。
Child Maltreat. 2021 Nov;26(4):356-362. doi: 10.1177/1077559520983901. Epub 2020 Dec 30.
9
Crimes Against Women: From Violence to Homicide.针对妇女的犯罪:从暴力到杀人。
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Dec;36(23-24):NP12973-NP12996. doi: 10.1177/0886260520905547. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
10
Can Justice System Interventions Prevent Intimate Partner Homicide? An Analysis of Rates of Help Seeking Prior to Fatality.司法干预能否预防亲密伴侣杀人?对致命事件前寻求帮助的比率的分析。
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Sep;36(17-18):8792-8816. doi: 10.1177/0886260519851179. Epub 2019 Jun 4.

引用本文的文献

1
A Transdisciplinary Analysis of Domestic Violence Homicides in Harris County, Texas (2016-2020).德克萨斯州哈里斯县家庭暴力杀人案的跨学科分析(2016 - 2020年)
Homicide Stud. 2023 Nov;27(4):472-492. doi: 10.1177/10887679231182331. Epub 2023 Jul 14.
2
Building a Transdisciplinary Team to Prevent Intimate Partner Homicide: A Research Note.组建跨学科团队预防亲密伴侣杀人案:一项研究笔记
Homicide Stud. 2023 Nov;27(4):454-471. doi: 10.1177/10887679231178786. Epub 2023 Jun 22.