• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

组建跨学科团队预防亲密伴侣杀人案:一项研究笔记

Building a Transdisciplinary Team to Prevent Intimate Partner Homicide: A Research Note.

作者信息

Pizarro Jesenia M, Messing Jill T, AbiNader Millan, Zeoli April M, Spearman Kathryn, Campbell Jacquelyn

机构信息

Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, USA.

University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

出版信息

Homicide Stud. 2023 Nov;27(4):454-471. doi: 10.1177/10887679231178786. Epub 2023 Jun 22.

DOI:10.1177/10887679231178786
PMID:39268013
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11391856/
Abstract

Intimate partner violence (IPV) and intimate partner homicide (IPH) are complex global problems. Transdisciplinary research approaches offer the potential to increase the understanding of these events and inform best practices for prevention. To encourage scholars to adopt transdisciplinary practices when investigating multifaceted problems, this note employs a case study approach to detail one such effort-The Preventing and Assessing Intimate Partner Homicide Risk (PAIR) Studies. The goal of the PAIR Studies is to improve the understanding of IPH to inform the development of best practices for prevention. The note concludes with a discussion of the benefits of transdisciplinary approaches.

摘要

亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)和亲密伴侣杀人(IPH)是复杂的全球性问题。跨学科研究方法有可能增进对这些事件的理解,并为预防的最佳实践提供依据。为鼓励学者在调查多方面问题时采用跨学科方法,本笔记采用案例研究方法详细介绍了一项此类工作——预防和评估亲密伴侣杀人风险(PAIR)研究。PAIR研究的目标是增进对IPH的理解,为预防最佳实践的制定提供依据。笔记最后讨论了跨学科方法的益处。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8211/11391856/124447bba202/nihms-2005112-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8211/11391856/09244e939003/nihms-2005112-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8211/11391856/5514d4108616/nihms-2005112-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8211/11391856/124447bba202/nihms-2005112-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8211/11391856/09244e939003/nihms-2005112-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8211/11391856/5514d4108616/nihms-2005112-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8211/11391856/124447bba202/nihms-2005112-f0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Building a Transdisciplinary Team to Prevent Intimate Partner Homicide: A Research Note.组建跨学科团队预防亲密伴侣杀人案:一项研究笔记
Homicide Stud. 2023 Nov;27(4):454-471. doi: 10.1177/10887679231178786. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
2
Crimes Against Women: From Violence to Homicide.针对妇女的犯罪:从暴力到杀人。
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Dec;36(23-24):NP12973-NP12996. doi: 10.1177/0886260520905547. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
3
Intimate Partner Violence and Intimate Partner Homicide: Development of a Typology Based on Psychosocial Characteristics.亲密伴侣暴力和亲密伴侣杀人:基于社会心理特征的类型学发展。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Sep;37(17-18):NP15874-NP15898. doi: 10.1177/08862605211021989. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
4
Predictors of Intimate Partner Homicide in a Sample of Portuguese Male Domestic Offenders.预测葡萄牙男性家庭罪犯中亲密伴侣杀人的因素。
J Interpers Violence. 2019 Jun;34(12):2573-2598. doi: 10.1177/0886260516662304. Epub 2016 Aug 7.
5
The Arizona Intimate Partner Homicide (AzIPH) Study: a Step toward Updating and Expanding Risk Factors for Intimate Partner Homicide.亚利桑那州亲密伴侣杀人案(AzIPH)研究:迈向更新和扩展亲密伴侣杀人案风险因素的一步。
J Fam Violence. 2021;36(5):563-572. doi: 10.1007/s10896-021-00254-9. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
6
State Intimate Partner Violence-Related Firearm Laws and Intimate Partner Homicide Rates in the United States, 1991 to 2015.美国 1991 年至 2015 年与伴侣暴力相关的枪支法律和伴侣间杀人率。
Ann Intern Med. 2017 Oct 17;167(8):536-543. doi: 10.7326/M16-2849. Epub 2017 Sep 19.
7
Fracture variation in survivable versus fatal blunt force trauma associated with intimate partner violence.与亲密伴侣暴力相关的可存活与致命钝器创伤的骨折变化。
Forensic Sci Int. 2024 Apr;357:112000. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2024.112000. Epub 2024 Mar 18.
8
Sexual Coercion, Intimate Partner Violence, and Homicide: A Scoping Literature Review.性强迫、亲密伴侣暴力和杀人:范围文献综述。
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2024 Jan;25(1):341-353. doi: 10.1177/15248380221150474. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
9
The Perpetrator-Victim Relationship: An Important Clue in Understanding Intimate Partner Homicide in China.施害者-受害者关系:理解中国亲密伴侣杀人案的重要线索。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Aug;37(15-16):NP13446-NP13467. doi: 10.1177/08862605211005141. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
10
Risk Factors for Child Death During an Intimate Partner Homicide: A Case-Control Study.亲密伴侣杀人案中儿童死亡的风险因素:一项病例对照研究。
Child Maltreat. 2021 Nov;26(4):356-362. doi: 10.1177/1077559520983901. Epub 2020 Dec 30.

引用本文的文献

1
A Transdisciplinary Analysis of Domestic Violence Homicides in Harris County, Texas (2016-2020).德克萨斯州哈里斯县家庭暴力杀人案的跨学科分析(2016 - 2020年)
Homicide Stud. 2023 Nov;27(4):472-492. doi: 10.1177/10887679231182331. Epub 2023 Jul 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Domestic/Family Homicide: A Systematic Review of Empirical Evidence.国内/家庭杀人事件:实证证据的系统回顾。
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2023 Jul;24(3):1908-1928. doi: 10.1177/15248380221082084. Epub 2022 May 12.
2
The Association of Federal and State-level Firearm Restriction Policies With Intimate Partner Homicide: A Re-analysis by Race of the Victim.州和联邦层面枪支限制政策与亲密伴侣谋杀案的关联:以受害者种族为分类的重新分析。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Sep;37(17-18):NP16509-NP16533. doi: 10.1177/08862605211021988. Epub 2021 Jun 18.
3
The Arizona Intimate Partner Homicide (AzIPH) Study: a Step toward Updating and Expanding Risk Factors for Intimate Partner Homicide.亚利桑那州亲密伴侣杀人案(AzIPH)研究:迈向更新和扩展亲密伴侣杀人案风险因素的一步。
J Fam Violence. 2021;36(5):563-572. doi: 10.1007/s10896-021-00254-9. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
4
Accounting for Multiple Nonfatal Strangulation in Intimate Partner Violence Risk Assessment.将多次非致命性扼颈纳入亲密伴侣暴力风险评估中。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Jun;37(11-12):NP8430-NP8453. doi: 10.1177/0886260520975854. Epub 2020 Dec 5.
5
Examining Attempted and Completed Intimate Partner Homicide: A Qualitative Synthesis.审视亲密伴侣杀人未遂与既遂案件:一项定性综合研究
Violence Vict. 2019 Dec 1;34(6):869-888. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-18-00128.
6
The domestic violence fatality review clearinghouse: introduction to a new National Data System with a focus on firearms.家庭暴力死亡审查信息中心:聚焦枪支的新型国家数据系统介绍
Inj Epidemiol. 2019 Feb 25;6:6. doi: 10.1186/s40621-019-0182-2. eCollection 2019.
7
Family Can Hurt You the Most: Examining Perpetrators in Multiple Casualty Events.家庭也可能对你造成最大的伤害:在多起伤亡事件中审视施害者。
J Surg Res. 2019 Oct;242:172-176. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.04.018. Epub 2019 May 9.
8
Risk-Informed Intervention: Using Intimate Partner Violence Risk Assessment within an Evidence-Based Practice Framework.风险知情干预:在循证实践框架内使用亲密伴侣暴力风险评估。
Soc Work. 2019 Apr 1;64(2):103-112. doi: 10.1093/sw/swz009.
9
Defining and evaluating transdisciplinary research: implications for aging and technology.界定与评估跨学科研究:对老龄化与技术的启示
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019 Aug;14(6):533-542. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2018.1496361. Epub 2018 Oct 14.
10
Surveillance for Violent Deaths - National Violent Death Reporting System, 27 States, 2015.暴力死亡监测 - 国家暴力死亡报告系统,27 个州,2015 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2018 Sep 28;67(11):1-32. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6711a1.