• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

量刑改革后的产前保健:产前保健可及性和公平性的异质影响。

Prenatal healthcare after sentencing reform: heterogeneous effects for prenatal healthcare access and equity.

机构信息

The Ubuntu Center On Racism, Global Movements and Population Health Equity, Drexel University Dornsife School of Public Health, 3600 Market St, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.

Department of Sociology, Boston University, 100 Cummington Mall, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2022 May 12;22(1):954. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13359-7.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-022-13359-7
PMID:35549928
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9102339/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

High rates of imprisonment in the U.S. have significant health, social, and economic consequences, particularly for marginalized communities. This study examines imprisonment as a contextual driver of receiving prenatal care by evaluating whether early and adequate prenatal care improved after Pennsylvania's criminal sentencing reform reduced prison admissions.

METHODS

We linked individual-level birth certificate microdata on births (n = 999,503) in Pennsylvania (2009-2015), to monthly county-level rates of prison admissions. We apply an interrupted time series approach that contrasts post-policy changes in early and adequate prenatal care across counties where prison admissions were effectively reduced or continued to rise. We then tested whether prenatal care improvements were stronger among Black birthing people and those with lower levels of educational attainment.

RESULTS

In counties where prison admissions declined the most after the policy, early prenatal care increased from 69.0% to 73.2%, and inadequate prenatal care decreased from 18.1% to 15.9%. By comparison, improvements in early prenatal care were smaller in counties where prison admissions increased the most post-policy (73.5 to 76.4%) and there was no change to prenatal care inadequacy (14.4% pre and post). We find this pattern of improvements to be particularly strong among Black birthing people and those with lower levels of educational attainment.

CONCLUSIONS

Pennsylvania's sentencing reforms were associated with small advancements in racial and socioeconomic equity in prenatal care.

摘要

背景

美国高监禁率对健康、社会和经济都有重大影响,尤其是对边缘化社区。本研究通过评估宾夕法尼亚州刑事判决改革减少入狱人数后,早期和充分的产前护理是否有所改善,考察监禁作为获得产前护理的背景驱动因素。

方法

我们将宾夕法尼亚州(2009-2015 年)的个人层面出生证明微观数据(n=999503)与每月县级监狱入院率相关联。我们采用中断时间序列方法,对比在监狱入院人数有效减少或继续上升的县,政策变化前后早期和充分的产前护理情况。然后,我们测试了产前护理的改善是否在黑人产妇和教育程度较低的人群中更为明显。

结果

在政策实施后监狱入院人数下降最多的县,早期产前护理从 69.0%增加到 73.2%,产前护理不足从 18.1%下降到 15.9%。相比之下,在政策实施后监狱入院人数增加最多的县,早期产前护理的改善较小(从 73.5%增加到 76.4%),产前护理不足没有变化(分别为 14.4%和 14.4%)。我们发现,这种改善模式在黑人产妇和教育程度较低的人群中尤为明显。

结论

宾夕法尼亚州的判决改革与产前护理在种族和社会经济公平方面的微小进展有关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a37/9102339/fdd8e9145c2b/12889_2022_13359_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a37/9102339/fdd8e9145c2b/12889_2022_13359_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a37/9102339/fdd8e9145c2b/12889_2022_13359_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Prenatal healthcare after sentencing reform: heterogeneous effects for prenatal healthcare access and equity.量刑改革后的产前保健:产前保健可及性和公平性的异质影响。
BMC Public Health. 2022 May 12;22(1):954. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13359-7.
2
Juvenile penalty or leniency: Sentencing of juveniles in the criminal justice system.少年刑罚或从宽处理:刑事司法系统中对少年的量刑
Law Hum Behav. 2016 Aug;40(4):387-400. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000186. Epub 2016 Mar 14.
3
The compelling case for low-violence-risk preclusion in American prison policy.极具说服力的美国监狱政策低暴力风险排除理由。
Behav Sci Law. 2020 May;38(3):207-217. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2461. Epub 2020 Mar 26.
4
Actuarial risk assessment at sentencing: Potential consequences for mass incarceration and legitimacy.量刑中的精算风险评估:对大规模监禁和合法性的潜在影响。
Behav Sci Law. 2020 May;38(3):193-206. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2460. Epub 2020 Mar 26.
5
Risk Assessment in Criminal Sentencing.刑事量刑中的风险评估。
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2016;12:489-513. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-021815-092945. Epub 2015 Dec 11.
6
Factors Affecting Drug Use During Incarceration: A Cross-Sectional Study of Opioid-Dependent Persons from India.监禁期间影响药物使用的因素:对来自印度的阿片类药物依赖者的横断面研究。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2016 Feb;61:13-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2015.08.009. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
7
Medicaid Enrollment among Prison Inmates in a Non-expansion State: Exploring Predisposing, Enabling, and Need Factors Related to Enrollment Pre-incarceration and Post-Release.非扩张州中囚犯的医疗补助参保情况:探索与入狱前和释放后参保相关的倾向因素、促成因素和需求因素。
J Urban Health. 2018 Aug;95(4):454-466. doi: 10.1007/s11524-018-0275-1.
8
Quality of Antenatal Care for Women Who Experience Imprisonment in Ontario, Canada.加拿大安大略省监禁女性的产前保健质量。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Aug 3;3(8):e2012576. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.12576.
9
Diversion of Mentally Ill Offenders from the Criminal Justice System in Ireland: Comparison with England and Wales.爱尔兰将精神病罪犯从刑事司法系统中转移出来的情况:与英格兰和威尔士的比较。
Ir Med J. 2018 Mar 14;111(3):719.
10
Incarceration in fragile families.在脆弱家庭中被监禁。
Future Child. 2010 Fall;20(2):157-77. doi: 10.1353/foc.2010.0006.

引用本文的文献

1
County Incarceration Rate and Stroke Death: A Cross-Sectional Study of the Influence of Physical Environment, Health Care Access, and Community Mental Distress.县监禁率与中风死亡:一项关于物理环境、医疗保健可及性和社区精神困扰影响的横断面研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 May 20;14(10):e039065. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.039065. Epub 2025 May 13.
2
Structural racism and health: Assessing the mediating role of community mental distress and health care access in the association between mass incarceration and adverse birth outcomes.结构性种族主义与健康:评估社区精神困扰和医疗保健可及性在大规模监禁与不良出生结局之间关联中的中介作用。
SSM Popul Health. 2023 Oct 4;24:101529. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2023.101529. eCollection 2023 Dec.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Geographic barriers to prenatal care access and their consequences.产前护理可及性的地理障碍及其后果。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2021 Sep;3(5):100442. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100442. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
2
Paternal Jail Incarceration and Birth Outcomes: Evidence from New York City, 2010-2016.父亲入狱与生育结局:来自 2010-2016 年纽约市的证据。
Matern Child Health J. 2021 Aug;25(8):1221-1241. doi: 10.1007/s10995-021-03168-6. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
3
Associations between unstable housing, obstetric outcomes, and perinatal health care utilization.
Neighborhood Incarceration Rates and Adverse Birth Outcomes in New York City, 2010-2014.
2010-2014 年纽约市邻里监禁率与不良出生结局。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Mar 1;6(3):e236173. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.6173.
住房不稳定与产科结局和围产期保健利用之间的关联。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2019 Nov;1(4):100053. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2019.100053. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
4
The evolution of prenatal care delivery guidelines in the United States.美国产前护理指南的演变。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Apr;224(4):339-347. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.12.016. Epub 2020 Dec 13.
5
Incarceration Exposure and Barriers to Prenatal Care in the United States: Findings from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System.监禁经历与美国产前护理障碍:来自妊娠风险评估监测系统的发现。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 8;17(19):7331. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17197331.
6
County-level jail incarceration and preterm birth among non-Hispanic Black and white U.S. women, 1999-2015.1999 - 2015年美国非西班牙裔黑人和白人女性在县级监狱的监禁情况与早产情况
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Feb 26;250:112856. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112856.
7
Mass incarceration and public health: the association between black jail incarceration and adverse birth outcomes among black women in Louisiana.大规模监禁与公共卫生:路易斯安那州黑人女性因入狱而导致不良生育结局与入狱率之间的关系。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Dec 27;19(1):525. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2690-z.
8
Psychological and neighborhood factors associated with urban women's preventive care use.与城市女性预防保健利用相关的心理和邻里因素。
J Behav Med. 2020 Jun;43(3):346-364. doi: 10.1007/s10865-019-00122-4. Epub 2019 Dec 21.
9
Timing and Adequacy of Prenatal Care in the United States, 2016.2016年美国产前护理的时机与充分性
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2018 May;67(3):1-14.
10
Racism and health service utilisation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.种族主义与医疗服务利用:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2017 Dec 18;12(12):e0189900. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189900. eCollection 2017.