• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

皮肤感染的全身治疗。环丙沙星与头孢噻肟的比较研究。

Systemic treatment of cutaneous infections. A comparative study of ciprofloxacin and cefotaxime.

作者信息

Parish L C, Asper R

出版信息

Am J Med. 1987 Apr 27;82(4A):227-9.

PMID:3555041
Abstract

A prospective, double-blind, randomized study of hospitalized patients with skin and skin structure infections was conducted to compare orally administered ciprofloxacin and conventional intravenous cefotaxime therapy. Fifty-six patients, predominantly elderly women, were randomly assigned to receive either ciprofloxacin (24 patients, 25 infected sites) or cefotaxime (32 patients, 36 sites). Patients in the ciprofloxacin group received 750 mg of orally administered ciprofloxacin every 12 hours plus a placebo infusion while the other group received 2.0 g of cefotaxime intravenously every eight hours plus a placebo tablet every 12 hours. The average duration of treatment was seven to 10 days, with a maximum of 21 days. Clinical response per infected site in the ciprofloxacin group was as follows: resolution in 88 percent, improvement in 8 percent, and failure in 4 percent. In the cefotaxime group, there was resolution in 69 percent, improvement in 25 percent and failure in 6 percent. Bacteriologic response per site in the ciprofloxacin group was eradication in 88 percent and persistence in 12 percent. With cefotaxime there was 69 percent eradication, 3 percent marked reduction, 6 percent recurrence, and 22 percent persistence. Clinical and bacteriologic responses were combined using an algorithm to derive a cure rate, which was 91 percent for ciprofloxacin and 61 percent for cefotaxime (p = 0.0214).

摘要

对住院的皮肤和皮肤结构感染患者进行了一项前瞻性、双盲、随机研究,以比较口服环丙沙星与传统静脉注射头孢噻肟的治疗效果。56名患者(主要为老年女性)被随机分配接受环丙沙星治疗(24例患者,25个感染部位)或头孢噻肟治疗(32例患者,36个部位)。环丙沙星组患者每12小时口服750mg环丙沙星并输注安慰剂,而另一组每8小时静脉注射2.0g头孢噻肟并每12小时服用一片安慰剂。平均治疗持续时间为7至10天,最长21天。环丙沙星组每个感染部位的临床反应如下:88%痊愈,8%改善,4%治疗失败。在头孢噻肟组中,69%痊愈,25%改善,6%治疗失败。环丙沙星组每个部位的细菌学反应为88%根除,12%持续存在。使用头孢噻肟时,根除率为69%,显著降低率为3%,复发率为6%,持续存在率为22%。通过一种算法将临床和细菌学反应结合起来得出治愈率,环丙沙星的治愈率为91%,头孢噻肟为61%(p = 0.0214)。

相似文献

1
Systemic treatment of cutaneous infections. A comparative study of ciprofloxacin and cefotaxime.皮肤感染的全身治疗。环丙沙星与头孢噻肟的比较研究。
Am J Med. 1987 Apr 27;82(4A):227-9.
2
Comparative, double-blind study of oral ciprofloxacin and intravenous cefotaxime in skin and skin structure infections.
Am J Med. 1987 Apr 27;82(4A):220-3.
3
Double-blind comparison of ciprofloxacin with cefotaxime in the treatment of skin and skin structure infections.
Am J Med. 1987 Apr 27;82(4A):242-6.
4
Oral ciprofloxacin vs parenteral cefotaxime in the treatment of difficult skin and skin structure infections. A multicenter trial.
Arch Intern Med. 1989 Nov;149(11):2579-83.
5
A comparative evaluation of oral ofloxacin versus intravenous cefotaxime therapy for serious skin and skin structure infections.
Am J Med. 1989 Dec 29;87(6C):57S-60S.
6
Use of intravenous ciprofloxacin in difficult-to-treat infections.
Am J Med. 1987 Apr 27;82(4A):346-51.
7
Oral ciprofloxacin versus intravenous cefotaxime and ceftriaxone in the treatment of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.口服环丙沙星与静脉注射头孢噻肟和头孢曲松治疗自发性细菌性腹膜炎的比较。
Hepatogastroenterology. 2003 Sep-Oct;50(53):1426-30.
8
Ciprofloxacin: an update on clinical experience.环丙沙星:临床经验最新进展
Am J Med. 1987 Apr 27;82(4A):381-6.
9
Ciprofloxacin versus cefotaxime in skin and skin structure infections: a double-blind study.环丙沙星与头孢噻肟治疗皮肤及皮肤结构感染的双盲研究。
Chemioterapia. 1987 Jun;6(2 Suppl):432-4.
10
Comparison of intravenous ciprofloxacin and intravenous cefotaxime for antimicrobial prophylaxis in transurethral surgery.环丙沙星静脉注射与头孢噻肟静脉注射用于经尿道手术抗菌预防的比较
Am J Med. 1989 Nov 30;87(5A):252S-254S. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(89)90073-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Oral ciprofloxacin: a pharmacoeconomic evaluation of its use in the treatment of serious infections.口服环丙沙星:对其用于治疗严重感染的药物经济学评价
Pharmacoeconomics. 1993 May;3(5):398-421. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199303050-00007.
2
Ciprofloxacin. A review of its pharmacological profile and therapeutic use in the elderly.环丙沙星:老年患者药理学特征及治疗应用综述
Drugs Aging. 1994 Feb;4(2):145-73. doi: 10.2165/00002512-199404020-00007.
3
Ciprofloxacin. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use.
环丙沙星:抗菌活性、药代动力学特性及治疗用途综述
Drugs. 1988 Apr;35(4):373-447. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198835040-00003.
4
Bacterial infections of the skin treated with ciprofloxacin.用环丙沙星治疗的皮肤细菌感染。
Infection. 1988;16 Suppl 1:S55-6. doi: 10.1007/BF01650509.
5
Fluoroquinolone antimicrobial agents.氟喹诺酮类抗菌剂。
Clin Microbiol Rev. 1989 Oct;2(4):378-424. doi: 10.1128/CMR.2.4.378.
6
Antimicrobial therapy. Cost-benefit considerations.抗菌治疗。成本效益考量。
Drugs. 1989 Oct;38(4):473-80. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198938040-00001.
7
The use of oral fluoroquinolones in nursing home patients.口服氟喹诺酮类药物在疗养院患者中的应用。
Drugs Aging. 1992 Jul-Aug;2(4):310-29. doi: 10.2165/00002512-199202040-00005.