• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

环丙沙星静脉注射与头孢噻肟静脉注射用于经尿道手术抗菌预防的比较

Comparison of intravenous ciprofloxacin and intravenous cefotaxime for antimicrobial prophylaxis in transurethral surgery.

作者信息

Cox C E

机构信息

Department of Urology, University of Tennessee Center, Memphis.

出版信息

Am J Med. 1989 Nov 30;87(5A):252S-254S. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(89)90073-9.

DOI:10.1016/0002-9343(89)90073-9
PMID:2686427
Abstract

Intravenous ciprofloxacin has been investigated in the treatment of serious infections, including those of the urinary tract. In this double-blind, randomized study, its effectiveness as a prophylactic agent in men undergoing transurethral surgical procedures was compared with that of another intravenous agent, cefotaxime. One hundred six men with genitourinary tract obstruction were enrolled in the study. The 102 men evaluable for determination of efficacy (53 in the ciprofloxacin group and 49 in the cefotaxime group) received a single intravenous infusion of either 300 mg ciprofloxacin or 1,000 mg of cefotaxime prior to resection of the prostate for benign prostatic hypertrophy and prostatic carcinoma or internal urethrotomy for urethral stricture. A mean of 32.1 and 40.3 minutes for the ciprofloxacin and cefotaxime groups, respectively, elapsed between the end of the intravenous infusion and the onset of surgery; all but one patient in the ciprofloxacin group underwent catheterization after surgery, of which the mean duration was 3.7 days for both groups. At the time of hospital discharge, patients were evaluated clinically; 50 patients in the ciprofloxacin group (94 percent) and 45 in the cefotaxime group (92 percent) had no bacteriologic evidence of genitourinary tract infection. At follow-up two to six weeks after surgery for the patients with no bacteriologic evidence of genitourinary tract infection, fewer patients in the ciprofloxacin group (8 percent) than in the cefotaxime group (16 percent) remained without evidence of infection. Both drugs were well tolerated. This study demonstrated that a single intravenous dose of ciprofloxacin was as effective as a single dose of cefotaxime in reducing the incidence of infection following transurethral surgical procedures.

摘要

静脉注射环丙沙星已被用于治疗严重感染,包括尿路感染。在这项双盲随机研究中,将其作为预防性药物用于接受经尿道外科手术男性患者的有效性与另一种静脉注射药物头孢噻肟进行了比较。106例患有泌尿生殖道梗阻的男性患者参与了该研究。102例可评估疗效的男性患者(环丙沙星组53例,头孢噻肟组49例)在因良性前列腺增生、前列腺癌行前列腺切除术或因尿道狭窄行尿道内切开术前,分别接受了单次静脉输注300mg环丙沙星或1000mg头孢噻肟。环丙沙星组和头孢噻肟组静脉输注结束至手术开始的平均时间分别为32.1分钟和40.3分钟;环丙沙星组除1例患者外,所有患者术后均接受了导尿,两组的平均导尿持续时间均为3.7天。出院时,对患者进行临床评估;环丙沙星组50例患者(94%)和头孢噻肟组45例患者(92%)没有泌尿生殖道感染的细菌学证据。对没有泌尿生殖道感染细菌学证据的患者在术后2至6周进行随访时,环丙沙星组仍无感染证据的患者(8%)少于头孢噻肟组(16%)。两种药物耐受性均良好。这项研究表明,单次静脉注射环丙沙星在降低经尿道外科手术后感染发生率方面与单次注射头孢噻肟同样有效。

相似文献

1
Comparison of intravenous ciprofloxacin and intravenous cefotaxime for antimicrobial prophylaxis in transurethral surgery.环丙沙星静脉注射与头孢噻肟静脉注射用于经尿道手术抗菌预防的比较
Am J Med. 1989 Nov 30;87(5A):252S-254S. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(89)90073-9.
2
Intravenous ciprofloxacin versus cefotaxime prophylaxis during transurethral surgery.经尿道手术期间静脉注射环丙沙星与头孢噻肟预防感染的比较。
Am J Med. 1989 Nov 30;87(5A):250S-251S. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(89)90072-7.
3
Single-dose preoperative prophylaxis in transurethral surgery. Ciprofloxacin versus cefotaxime.经尿道手术中的单剂量术前预防。环丙沙星与头孢噻肟的比较。
Am J Med. 1989 Nov 30;87(5A):258S-260S. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(89)90075-2.
4
Systemic treatment of cutaneous infections. A comparative study of ciprofloxacin and cefotaxime.皮肤感染的全身治疗。环丙沙星与头孢噻肟的比较研究。
Am J Med. 1987 Apr 27;82(4A):227-9.
5
Comparative, double-blind study of oral ciprofloxacin and intravenous cefotaxime in skin and skin structure infections.
Am J Med. 1987 Apr 27;82(4A):220-3.
6
Double-blind comparison of ciprofloxacin with cefotaxime in the treatment of skin and skin structure infections.
Am J Med. 1987 Apr 27;82(4A):242-6.
7
[Effect of flash chemoprophylaxis by cefotaxime on the appearance of postoperative bacterial superinfections in surgery of the prostate].
Pathol Biol (Paris). 1985 May;33(5):325-9.
8
Oral ciprofloxacin vs parenteral cefotaxime in the treatment of difficult skin and skin structure infections. A multicenter trial.
Arch Intern Med. 1989 Nov;149(11):2579-83.
9
Single-dose ceftriaxone versus multi-dose cefotaxime as short-term antimicrobial prophylaxis in urologic surgery. Preliminary results of a multicenter prospective randomized study.
Chemioterapia. 1984 Oct;3(5):295-8.
10
Cefotaxime for prevention of infectious complications in bacteriuric men undergoing transurethral prostatic resection. A controlled comparison with methenamine.
Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1983;17(3):299-301. doi: 10.3109/00365598309182135.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of antibiotic prophylaxis prescribing patterns for TURP: A need for Canadian guidelines?经尿道前列腺切除术抗生素预防用药处方模式评估:加拿大是否需要指南?
Can Urol Assoc J. 2013 Jul-Aug;7(7-8):E530-6. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.205.
2
Ciprofloxacin. An updated review of its pharmacology, therapeutic efficacy and tolerability.环丙沙星。对其药理学、治疗效果及耐受性的最新综述。
Drugs. 1996 Jun;51(6):1019-74. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199651060-00010.
3
Ciprofloxacin. A review of its pharmacological profile and therapeutic use in the elderly.
环丙沙星:老年患者药理学特征及治疗应用综述
Drugs Aging. 1994 Feb;4(2):145-73. doi: 10.2165/00002512-199404020-00007.
4
Fluoroquinolones and surgical prophylaxis.氟喹诺酮类药物与手术预防
Drugs. 1993;45 Suppl 3:102-13. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199300453-00018.
5
Cefotaxime. An update of its pharmacology and therapeutic use.头孢噻肟。其药理学与治疗应用的最新进展。
Drugs. 1990 Oct;40(4):608-51. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199040040-00008.
6
Role of quinolones in surgical prophylaxis.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1991 Apr;10(4):368-77. doi: 10.1007/BF01967013.