Suppr超能文献

环丙沙星与西诺沙星治疗尿路感染的随机双盲试验

Ciprofloxacin versus cinoxacin in therapy of urinary tract infections. A randomized, double-blind trial.

作者信息

Goldstein E J, Kahn R M, Alpert M L, Ginsberg B P, Greenway F L, Citron D M

出版信息

Am J Med. 1987 Apr 27;82(4A):284-7.

PMID:3555049
Abstract

In a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial, ciprofloxacin (250 mg orally, twice daily) was compared with cinoxacin (500 mg orally, twice daily) in 60 patients with urinary tract infections. Most patients were women with uncomplicated urinary tract infections. Escherichia coli was the most common isolate (36 patients). Clinical and microbiologic cure occurred in 20 of 24 (83 percent) evaluable patients treated with ciprofloxacin, compared with 15 of 21 (71 percent) evaluable patients treated with cinoxacin. Ciprofloxacin was well tolerated and had a low incidence of minor side effects that included Candida vaginitis, headache, and gastrointestinal intolerance. Relapse or failed therapy was not associated with the development of resistance.

摘要

在一项前瞻性、随机、双盲试验中,对60例尿路感染患者比较了环丙沙星(口服250毫克,每日两次)与西诺沙星(口服500毫克,每日两次)的疗效。大多数患者为患有单纯性尿路感染的女性。大肠杆菌是最常见的分离菌(36例患者)。接受环丙沙星治疗的24例可评估患者中有20例(83%)实现了临床和微生物学治愈,而接受西诺沙星治疗的21例可评估患者中有15例(71%)实现了临床和微生物学治愈。环丙沙星耐受性良好,轻微副作用的发生率较低,包括念珠菌性阴道炎、头痛和胃肠道不耐受。复发或治疗失败与耐药性的产生无关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验