Suppr超能文献

社区获得性败血症住院患者的从家到医院的距离与结局。

Home-to-hospital distance and outcomes among community-acquired sepsis hospitalizations.

机构信息

Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.

Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA.

出版信息

Ann Epidemiol. 2022 Aug;72:26-31. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2022.05.001. Epub 2022 May 9.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To examine the hypothesis that longer distance from home-to-hospital is associated with worse outcomes among hospitalizations for community-acquired sepsis.

METHODS

A secondary analysis of data from the REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) prospective cohort of 30,239 white and Black US adults greater than or equal to 45 years old was conducted. Self-reported hospitalizations for serious infection between 2003 and 2012 fulfilling 2/4 systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria were included. Estimated driving distance was derived from geocoded data and evaluated continuously and as quartiles of very close, close, far, very far (<3.1, 3.1-5.8, 5.9-11.5, and >11.5 miles respectively). The primary outcome was 30-day mortality while the secondary outcome was sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score on arrival.

RESULTS

Of the 912 hospitalizations for community-acquired sepsis had adequate data for analysis. The median (interquartile range) estimated driving distance was 5.8 miles (3.1,11.7), and 54 (5.9%) experienced the primary outcome. Compared to living very close, participants living very far had a mortality odds ratio of 1.30 (95% CI 0.64,2.62) and presenting SOFA score difference of 0.33 (95% CI -0.03,0.68).

CONCLUSIONS

Among a national sample of community-acquired sepsis hospitalizations, there was no significant association between home-to-hospital distance and either 30-day mortality or SOFA score on hospital presentation.

摘要

目的

检验这样一个假设,即居住地到医院的距离越远,与社区获得性败血症住院患者的预后越差之间存在关联。

方法

对“美国地理和种族差异中风原因(REGARDS)”前瞻性队列中 30239 名白人和黑人年龄大于或等于 45 岁的成年人的数据进行二次分析。纳入 2003 年至 2012 年间自我报告的符合 2/4 全身炎症反应综合征标准的严重感染住院治疗病例。通过地理编码数据估计驾驶距离,并连续评估和分为四个四分位数的非常近、近、远、非常远(分别为<3.1、3.1-5.8、5.9-11.5 和>11.5 英里)。主要结局是 30 天死亡率,次要结局是入院时的序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分。

结果

在 912 例社区获得性败血症住院患者中,有足够数据进行分析。估计驾驶距离的中位数(四分位距)为 5.8 英里(3.1,11.7),54 例(5.9%)发生主要结局。与居住非常近的患者相比,居住非常远的患者的死亡率比值比为 1.30(95%CI 0.64,2.62),入院时的 SOFA 评分差值为 0.33(95%CI-0.03,0.68)。

结论

在全国性社区获得性败血症住院患者样本中,居住地到医院的距离与 30 天死亡率或入院时 SOFA 评分之间没有显著关联。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

7
Time to Treatment and Mortality during Mandated Emergency Care for Sepsis.脓毒症强制紧急治疗的治疗时间与死亡率
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jun 8;376(23):2235-2244. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1703058. Epub 2017 May 21.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验