Hospital Pharmacy, Hospital St. Georg, Delitzscher Str. 141, 04129, Leipzig, Germany.
Department of Radiology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Infection. 2023 Feb;51(1):97-108. doi: 10.1007/s15010-022-01841-8. Epub 2022 May 12.
The benefits of antiviral treatment with remdesivir in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 remain controversial. Clinical analyses are needed to demonstrate which patient populations are most likely to benefit.
In a retrospective monocentric analysis, patients with COVID-19 treated between July 1, 2020 and June 30, 2021 at Hospital St. Georg, Leipzig, Germany were evaluated. The primary endpoint was time to clinical improvement, and the secondary endpoint was 28-day mortality. Propensity score matching was used for the endpoint analysis.
A total of 839 patients were fully evaluated, 68% of whom received specific COVID-19 drug therapy. Remdesivir was used in 31.3% of the patients, corticosteroids in 61.7%, and monoclonal antibodies in 2.3%. While dexamethasone administration was the most common therapeutic approach during the second pandemic wave, combination therapy with remdesivir and corticosteroids predominated during the third wave. Cox regression analysis revealed that combination therapy was not associated with faster clinical improvement (median: 13 days in both matched groups, HR 0.97 [95% CI 0.77-1.21], P = 0.762). By contrast, 28-day mortality was significantly lower in the corticosteroid-remdesivir group (14.8% versus 22.2% in the corticosteroid group, HR 0.60 [95% CI 0.39-0.95], P = 0.03) in the low-care setting. This effect was also demonstrated in a subgroup analysis of patients with remdesivir monotherapy (n = 44) versus standard of care (SOC).
In COVID-19 patients with only mild disease (low-flow oxygen therapy and treatment in a normal ward) who received corticosteroids and/or remdesivir in addition to SOC, early administration of remdesivir was associated with a measurable survival benefit.
瑞德西韦抗病毒治疗住院 COVID-19 患者的益处仍存在争议。需要临床分析来证明哪些患者群体最有可能受益。
在一项回顾性单中心分析中,评估了德国莱比锡圣乔治医院 2020 年 7 月 1 日至 2021 年 6 月 30 日期间治疗的 COVID-19 患者。主要终点是临床改善时间,次要终点是 28 天死亡率。终点分析采用倾向评分匹配。
共对 839 例患者进行了全面评估,其中 68%接受了特定的 COVID-19 药物治疗。瑞德西韦在 31.3%的患者中使用,皮质类固醇在 61.7%的患者中使用,单克隆抗体在 2.3%的患者中使用。虽然地塞米松治疗是第二波大流行期间最常见的治疗方法,但在第三波大流行期间,瑞德西韦和皮质类固醇联合治疗占主导地位。Cox 回归分析显示,联合治疗与更快的临床改善无关(中位数:匹配组均为 13 天,HR 0.97[95%CI 0.77-1.21],P=0.762)。相比之下,皮质类固醇-瑞德西韦组的 28 天死亡率显著降低(皮质类固醇组为 22.2%,皮质类固醇-瑞德西韦组为 14.8%,HR 0.60[95%CI 0.39-0.95],P=0.03)在低护理环境中。在瑞德西韦单药治疗(n=44)与标准治疗(SOC)的患者亚组分析中也观察到了这种效果。
在仅接受 SOC 加用皮质类固醇和/或瑞德西韦治疗的轻度疾病(低流量吸氧治疗和普通病房治疗)的 COVID-19 患者中,早期给予瑞德西韦与可衡量的生存获益相关。