Medical Clinic 1, Department of Medicine, University Hospital Erlangen, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Erlangen, Germany.
J Crohns Colitis. 2022 May 11;16(Supplement_2):ii54-ii63. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjac007.
Increasing insights into the immunopathogenesis of inflammatory bowel diseases [IBD] have led to the advent of targeted therapies that inhibit crucial mediators of the inflammatory process, thereby widening our available therapeutic armamentarium. Anti-tumour necrosis factor [anti-TNF] agents are still a mainstay of our therapeutic endeavours and the introduction of corresponding biosimilars has further widened their use. Nevertheless, only a subgroup of treated patients benefit from the initiated treatment and there is secondary non-response in the course of therapy. Initiation of subsequent therapy often poses a challenge to the treating physician, as non-response to primary anti-TNF treatment generally characterizes a patient group that is more treatment-resistant, which may be due to the immunological impregnation by prior anti-TNF exposure. At present, there is currently no guidance for the most appropriate second-line therapy after anti-TNF failure. Here, we review the efficacy of secondary biological therapy in anti-TNF-treated patients. We focus on and assess available clinical trial data of the emerging substance class of IL-23p19 inhibitors, which have demonstrated remarkable efficacy not only in anti-TNF-naïve but also refractory patients. We present molecular mechanisms that drive IL-23-mediated resistance to ongoing anti-TNF therapy and discuss the dynamic fluidity of the mucosal cytokine network in the course of therapy that perpetuates the mucosal inflammatory reaction. Translation of these findings into clinical practice might finally lead to initiation of the most appropriate therapy at the right time of the individual disease course, which would have important implications for the patient's probability of response to treatment.
对炎症性肠病(IBD)免疫发病机制的深入了解导致了靶向治疗的出现,这些治疗方法抑制了炎症过程中的关键介质,从而扩大了我们现有的治疗手段。抗肿瘤坏死因子(anti-TNF)药物仍然是我们治疗努力的主要手段,相应的生物仿制药的引入进一步扩大了它们的应用。然而,只有一小部分接受治疗的患者从启动的治疗中获益,并且在治疗过程中存在继发性无反应。随后治疗的启动常常给治疗医生带来挑战,因为对初级 anti-TNF 治疗的无反应通常代表了一组更具治疗抵抗性的患者,这可能是由于先前的 anti-TNF 暴露导致了免疫浸润。目前,对于抗 TNF 治疗失败后的最佳二线治疗,尚无指导。在这里,我们回顾了二级生物治疗在接受抗 TNF 治疗的患者中的疗效。我们重点评估和评估新兴的 IL-23p19 抑制剂物质类别的现有临床试验数据,这些抑制剂不仅在抗 TNF 初治患者中,而且在难治性患者中均显示出显著疗效。我们提出了驱动 IL-23 介导的对持续抗 TNF 治疗的耐药性的分子机制,并讨论了治疗过程中粘膜细胞因子网络的动态流动性,这种流动性持续引发粘膜炎症反应。将这些发现转化为临床实践可能最终导致在个体疾病过程的正确时间启动最合适的治疗,这对患者对治疗的反应概率具有重要意义。