Suppr超能文献

教学医院中冰冻切片诊断的准确性。

Accuracy of frozen-section diagnosis in a teaching hospital.

作者信息

Rogers C, Klatt E C, Chandrasoma P

出版信息

Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1987 Jun;111(6):514-7.

PMID:3555403
Abstract

A retrospective quality assurance study of frozen-section diagnoses was performed to determine the source and nature of inaccuracies associated with this procedure over an 18-month period in a large teaching hospital. Of 30,278 surgical pathology specimens accessioned, 1414 (4.7%) had frozen-section examination. Of these, there were five false-positive diagnoses of malignancy (0.4%), 16 false-negative diagnoses of malignancy (1.1%), and 53 deferrals of diagnosis (3.7%). Soft-tissue, breast, and lymph node sites accounted for 12 errors (57%), while central nervous system, breast, and soft-tissue sites were associated with 30 deferrals (57%). Erroneous frozen-section diagnoses were attributed to interpretation (57%), microscopic sampling (24%), gross sampling (9.5%), and lack of communication between pathologist and surgeon (9.5%). Some of these diagnostic errors might have been avoided by changes in procedure or technique.

摘要

进行了一项关于冰冻切片诊断的回顾性质量保证研究,以确定在一家大型教学医院18个月期间与该程序相关的不准确诊断的来源和性质。在登记的30278份外科病理标本中,1414份(4.7%)进行了冰冻切片检查。其中,有5例假阳性恶性肿瘤诊断(0.4%),16例假阴性恶性肿瘤诊断(1.1%),以及53例诊断延迟(3.7%)。软组织、乳腺和淋巴结部位占12例错误(57%),而中枢神经系统、乳腺和软组织部位与30例诊断延迟相关(57%)。错误的冰冻切片诊断归因于解读(57%)、显微镜下取材(24%)、大体取材(9.5%)以及病理学家与外科医生之间缺乏沟通(9.5%)。其中一些诊断错误可能通过程序或技术的改变得以避免。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验