Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
University of South Carolina School of Medicine Greenville, Greenville, SC, USA.
Surg Endosc. 2022 Dec;36(12):9403-9409. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09260-4. Epub 2022 May 12.
The effect of skin closure technique on surgical site occurrences (SSO) after open abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) with retromuscular polypropylene mesh placement is largely unknown. We hypothesize that layered subcuticular skin closure with cyanoacrylate skin adhesive is protective of surgical site infection compared to standard stapled closure.
A retrospective review utilizing the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative (ACHQC) database of all patients at Prisma Health-Upstate. All patients with open abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) of midline incisional hernia defects with retromuscular polypropylene mesh placement from January 2013 to February 2020 were included. Patient demographics, comorbidities, type of hernia repair with mesh location, method of skin closure, and SSOs were collected. Skin closure method was divided into two groups, reflecting a temporal change in practice: staples (historical control group) versus subcuticular suture with cyanoacrylate skin adhesive with/without polymer mesh tape (study group). Primary endpoint was SSI and SSO. Secondary endpoints were SSO or SSI requiring procedural intervention (SSOPI/SSIPI). Standard statistical methods were utilized.
A total of 834 patients were analyzed, with 263 treated with stapled skin closure and 571 with subcuticular and adhesive closure. On univariate analysis, the incidence of SSI was significantly lower in the study group (11.8 vs 6.8%; p = 0.002), as was the need for SSIPI (11.8 vs 6.7%; p = 0.015). Rate of SSO was not significantly different between groups (28.1 vs 27.2%), but the rate of SSO requiring intervention was lower in the study group (14.1 vs 9.3%; p = 0.045).
Layered skin closure technique, including subcuticular closure and adhesive, may reduce the risk of surgical site infection after open AWR. A prospective randomized trial is planned to confirm these findings.
在使用后置式聚丙烯网片进行开放式腹壁重建(AWR)后,皮肤缝合技术对手术部位并发症(SSO)的影响尚不清楚。我们假设与标准钉合闭合相比,使用氰基丙烯酸酯皮肤粘合剂进行分层皮下皮内缝合对手术部位感染具有保护作用。
利用 Prisma Health-Upstate 的腹部核心健康质量协作(ACHQC)数据库对所有患者进行回顾性研究。纳入 2013 年 1 月至 2020 年 2 月期间接受开放式腹壁重建(AWR)中线切口疝缺损修复且使用后置式聚丙烯网片的所有患者。收集患者人口统计学、合并症、疝修补类型和网片位置、皮肤闭合方法和 SSO 等资料。皮肤闭合方法分为两组,反映实践中的时间变化:钉合(历史对照组)与皮下缝合加/不加聚合物网片胶带的氰基丙烯酸酯皮肤粘合剂(研究组)。主要终点是 SSI 和 SSO。次要终点是需要手术干预的 SSO 或 SSI(SSOPI/SSIPI)。采用标准统计方法。
共分析了 834 例患者,其中 263 例采用钉合皮肤闭合,571 例采用皮下和粘合剂闭合。单因素分析显示,研究组 SSI 的发生率明显较低(11.8%比 6.8%;p=0.002),SSIPI 的需要率也较低(11.8%比 6.7%;p=0.015)。两组 SSO 的发生率无显著差异(28.1%比 27.2%),但研究组需要干预的 SSO 发生率较低(14.1%比 9.3%;p=0.045)。
分层皮肤闭合技术,包括皮下闭合和粘合剂,可能降低开放式 AWR 后手术部位感染的风险。计划进行一项前瞻性随机试验以证实这些发现。