• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

当惩罚目标调节并介导临床报告对监狱服刑累犯风险的影响时。

When punishment goals moderate and mediate the effect of clinical reports on the recidivism risk on prison sentences.

作者信息

Niang Anta, Leclerc Chloé, Testé Benoît

机构信息

Canada Research Chair in Evaluating Public Actions Related to Young People and Vulnerable Populations (CREVAJ), École Nationale d'Administration Publique, Montréal, Canada.

Partnership Research Program (RÉ)SO 16-35, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières (UQTR), Trois-Rivieres, Canada.

出版信息

Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2020 Nov 10;28(4):531-545. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2020.1805811. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1080/13218719.2020.1805811
PMID:35558147
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9090404/
Abstract

This research examined whether an individual's endorsement of punishment goals moderates and mediates the effect of a clinical assessment of recidivism risk on the length of prison sentences. We measured participants' endorsement of punishment goals, both before they read a criminal case (i.e. a priori endorsement), and after they had read it (i.e. case-specific endorsement). As expected, the effect of the clinical report's conclusion on participants' sentencing decisions was moderated by a priori endorsement of incapacitation as a punishment goal. Participants who expressed strong (versus weak) a priori endorsement of this punishment goal were influenced by the report's conclusion on the risk of recidivism. In addition, when the clinical report concluded that the offender had a high risk of recidivating, participants expressed greater case-specific motivation to incapacitate him. Finally, the clinical report's conclusion had an indirect effect on the severity of the sentence through case-specific endorsement of the incapacitation punishment goal.

摘要

本研究考察了个体对惩罚目标的认同是否会调节和中介累犯风险临床评估对监禁刑期长短的影响。我们测量了参与者在阅读刑事案件之前(即先验认同)和阅读之后(即特定案件认同)对惩罚目标的认同情况。正如预期的那样,临床报告结论对参与者量刑决定的影响受到将 incapacitation 作为惩罚目标的先验认同的调节。对这一惩罚目标表达强烈(而非微弱)先验认同的参与者受到报告关于累犯风险结论的影响。此外,当临床报告得出罪犯有高累犯风险的结论时,参与者表现出更大的特定案件动机来 incapacitate 他。最后,临床报告的结论通过对 incapacitation 惩罚目标的特定案件认同对刑期的严厉程度产生间接影响。

相似文献

1
When punishment goals moderate and mediate the effect of clinical reports on the recidivism risk on prison sentences.当惩罚目标调节并介导临床报告对监狱服刑累犯风险的影响时。
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2020 Nov 10;28(4):531-545. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2020.1805811. eCollection 2021.
2
Public support for sentencing reform: A policy-capturing experiment.公众对量刑改革的支持:一项政策捕捉实验。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2021 Jun;27(2):430-446. doi: 10.1037/xap0000339. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
3
Evidence-based sentencing: Public openness and opposition to using gender, age, and race as risk factors for recidivism.循证量刑:公众对将性别、年龄和种族作为累犯风险因素的公开态度及反对意见。
Law Hum Behav. 2016 Feb;40(1):36-41. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000161.
4
Punishment after Life: How Attitudes about Longer-than-Life Sentences Expose the Rules of Retribution.死后的惩罚:关于超长刑期的态度如何揭示报应规则
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Sep 23;14(9):855. doi: 10.3390/bs14090855.
5
Crime and punishment in Saudi Arabia: Lashing, imprisonment, and other unusual punishments.沙特阿拉伯的犯罪与惩罚:鞭笞、监禁及其他特殊惩罚。
Child Abuse Negl. 2023 Jan;135:105948. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2022.105948. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
6
Attitudes toward the Punishment of Juvenile and Adult Sexual Offenders in Canada: The Roles of Sentencing Goals and Criminal Justice Motivations.加拿大对青少年和成年性犯罪者惩罚的态度:量刑目标和刑事司法动机的作用。
J Child Sex Abus. 2021 Feb-Mar;30(2):125-145. doi: 10.1080/10538712.2020.1862947. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
7
Exploring methods to investigate sentencing decisions.探索研究量刑决策的方法。
Eval Rev. 2010 Jun;34(3):185-219. doi: 10.1177/0193841X10369624.
8
Reactions to mandatory sentences in relation to the ethnic identity and criminal history of the offender.对与罪犯种族身份和犯罪历史相关的强制性判决的反应。
Law Hum Behav. 2002 Aug;26(4):417-38. doi: 10.1023/a:1016331221797.
9
Punishing repeat offenders in the Netherlands: balancing between incapacitation and treatment.荷兰对惯犯的惩罚:在剥夺能力与治疗之间寻求平衡。
Behav Sci Law. 2015 Feb;33(1):148-66. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2168.
10
When sexual offender treatment in prison-based social-therapeutic treatment is not completed: Relationship to risk factors and recidivism after release.当性犯罪者在监狱中的社会治疗性治疗中未完成治疗时:与风险因素的关系以及释放后的累犯。
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2021 Dec;31(6):421-435. doi: 10.1002/cbm.2220. Epub 2021 Oct 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Justification of Sentencing Decisions: Development of a Ratio-Based Measure Tested on Child Neglect Cases.量刑决策的正当理由:一种基于比率的衡量标准在儿童忽视案件中的测试开发
Front Psychol. 2022 Jan 14;12:761536. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.761536. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Do risk assessment tools help manage and reduce risk of violence and reoffending? A systematic review.风险评估工具是否有助于管理和降低暴力行为和再犯罪的风险?系统评价。
Law Hum Behav. 2018 Jun;42(3):181-214. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000280. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
2
Performance of recidivism risk assessment instruments in U.S. correctional settings.美国惩教机构中累犯风险评估工具的表现。
Psychol Serv. 2016 Aug;13(3):206-222. doi: 10.1037/ser0000075. Epub 2016 Jun 6.
3
G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.G*Power 3:一款适用于社会科学、行为科学和生物医学科学的灵活的统计功效分析程序。
Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91. doi: 10.3758/bf03193146.
4
The function of punishment in the "civil" commitment of sexually violent predators.对性暴力捕食者进行“民事”收押时惩罚的作用。
Behav Sci Law. 2007;25(4):437-48. doi: 10.1002/bsl.761.
5
The effects of rational and experiential information processing of expert testimony in death penalty cases.死刑案件中专家证词的理性与经验性信息处理的效果。
Behav Sci Law. 2004;22(6):801-22. doi: 10.1002/bsl.621.
6
Punishment goals of crime victims.
Law Hum Behav. 2003 Apr;27(2):173-86. doi: 10.1023/a:1022547213760.
7
Deliberating on dangerousness and death: jurors' ability to differentiate between expert actuarial and clinical predictions of dangerousness.审议危险性与死亡:陪审员区分专家精算预测与临床危险性预测的能力。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2003 Mar-Apr;26(2):113-37. doi: 10.1016/s0160-2527(02)00211-x.
8
Why do we punish? Deterrence and just deserts as motives for punishment.我们为何进行惩罚?威慑与应得的惩罚作为惩罚的动机。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002 Aug;83(2):284-299. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.83.2.284.
9
Incapacitation and just deserts as motives for punishment.惩罚的动机: incapacitation(使无能力)和应得的惩罚
Law Hum Behav. 2000 Dec;24(6):659-83. doi: 10.1023/a:1005552203727.
10
Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious.认知无意识与心理动力无意识的整合。
Am Psychol. 1994 Aug;49(8):709-24. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.49.8.709.