• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

死后的惩罚:关于超长刑期的态度如何揭示报应规则

Punishment after Life: How Attitudes about Longer-than-Life Sentences Expose the Rules of Retribution.

作者信息

Aharoni Eyal, Nahmias Eddy, Hoffman Morris B, Fernandes Sharlene

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30302, USA.

Department of Philosophy, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30302, USA.

出版信息

Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Sep 23;14(9):855. doi: 10.3390/bs14090855.

DOI:10.3390/bs14090855
PMID:39336070
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11429324/
Abstract

Prison sentences that exceed the natural lifespan present a puzzle because they have no more power to deter or incapacitate than a single life sentence. In three survey experiments, we tested the extent to which participants support these longer-than-life sentences under different decision contexts. In Experiment 1, 130 undergraduates made hypothetical prison sentence-length recommendations for a serious criminal offender, warranting two sentences to be served either concurrently or consecutively. Using a nationally representative sample (N = 182) and an undergraduate pilot sample (N = 260), participants in Experiments 2 and 3 voted on a hypothetical ballot measure to either allow or prohibit the use of consecutive life sentences. Results from all experiments revealed that, compared to concurrent life sentences participants supported the use of consecutive life sentences for serious offenders. In addition, they adjusted these posthumous years in response to mitigating factors in a manner that was indistinguishable from ordinary sentences (Experiment 1), and their support for consecutive life sentencing policies persisted, regardless of the default choice and whether the policy was costly to implement (Experiments 2 and 3). These judgment patterns were most consistent with retributive punishment heuristics and have implications for sentencing policy and for theories of punishment behavior.

摘要

超过自然寿命的监禁刑期令人费解,因为它们在威慑或剥夺犯罪能力方面并不比单一的终身监禁更有效。在三项调查实验中,我们测试了参与者在不同决策背景下支持这些超长刑期的程度。在实验1中,130名本科生针对一名严重刑事罪犯做出假设性的监禁刑期建议,该罪犯应服两项刑期,可同时服刑或连续服刑。实验2和实验3的参与者使用全国代表性样本(N = 182)和本科生试点样本(N = 260),就一项假设性投票措施进行表决,以决定是否允许使用连续终身监禁。所有实验的结果都表明,与同时服刑的终身监禁相比,参与者支持对严重罪犯使用连续终身监禁。此外,他们会根据减轻处罚的因素调整这些死后服刑年限,其方式与普通刑期并无二致(实验1),而且无论默认选择如何以及该政策实施成本高低,他们对连续终身监禁判决政策的支持都持续存在(实验2和实验3)。这些判断模式与报应性惩罚启发式最为一致,对量刑政策和惩罚行为理论具有启示意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72e3/11429324/76102fc9c5ee/behavsci-14-00855-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72e3/11429324/483d059c37f2/behavsci-14-00855-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72e3/11429324/ee9003eeffd1/behavsci-14-00855-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72e3/11429324/76102fc9c5ee/behavsci-14-00855-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72e3/11429324/483d059c37f2/behavsci-14-00855-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72e3/11429324/ee9003eeffd1/behavsci-14-00855-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72e3/11429324/76102fc9c5ee/behavsci-14-00855-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Punishment after Life: How Attitudes about Longer-than-Life Sentences Expose the Rules of Retribution.死后的惩罚:关于超长刑期的态度如何揭示报应规则
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Sep 23;14(9):855. doi: 10.3390/bs14090855.
2
Public support for sentencing reform: A policy-capturing experiment.公众对量刑改革的支持:一项政策捕捉实验。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2021 Jun;27(2):430-446. doi: 10.1037/xap0000339. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
3
Attitudes toward the Punishment of Juvenile and Adult Sexual Offenders in Canada: The Roles of Sentencing Goals and Criminal Justice Motivations.加拿大对青少年和成年性犯罪者惩罚的态度:量刑目标和刑事司法动机的作用。
J Child Sex Abus. 2021 Feb-Mar;30(2):125-145. doi: 10.1080/10538712.2020.1862947. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
4
Crime and punishment in Saudi Arabia: Lashing, imprisonment, and other unusual punishments.沙特阿拉伯的犯罪与惩罚:鞭笞、监禁及其他特殊惩罚。
Child Abuse Negl. 2023 Jan;135:105948. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2022.105948. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
5
Justification of Sentencing Decisions: Development of a Ratio-Based Measure Tested on Child Neglect Cases.量刑决策的正当理由:一种基于比率的衡量标准在儿童忽视案件中的测试开发
Front Psychol. 2022 Jan 14;12:761536. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.761536. eCollection 2021.
6
When punishment goals moderate and mediate the effect of clinical reports on the recidivism risk on prison sentences.当惩罚目标调节并介导临床报告对监狱服刑累犯风险的影响时。
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2020 Nov 10;28(4):531-545. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2020.1805811. eCollection 2021.
7
Impact of information about sentencing decisions on public attitudes toward the criminal justice system.量刑决定信息对公众对刑事司法系统态度的影响。
Law Hum Behav. 2001 Oct;25(5):515-28. doi: 10.1023/a:1012844932754.
8
Evidence-based sentencing: Public openness and opposition to using gender, age, and race as risk factors for recidivism.循证量刑:公众对将性别、年龄和种族作为累犯风险因素的公开态度及反对意见。
Law Hum Behav. 2016 Feb;40(1):36-41. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000161.
9
Reactions to mandatory sentences in relation to the ethnic identity and criminal history of the offender.对与罪犯种族身份和犯罪历史相关的强制性判决的反应。
Law Hum Behav. 2002 Aug;26(4):417-38. doi: 10.1023/a:1016331221797.
10
Cooperative guardian offenders and sentencing outcomes: Evidence from criminal sentencing documents of child trafficking crime in China.共同监护人罪犯与量刑结果:来自中国贩卖儿童犯罪刑事量刑文件的证据。
Child Abuse Negl. 2022 Feb;124:105449. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.105449. Epub 2021 Dec 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Nudges for Judges: An Experiment on the Effect of Making Sentencing Costs Explicit.给法官的助推:一项关于明确量刑成本影响的实验
Front Psychol. 2022 May 20;13:889933. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.889933. eCollection 2022.
2
Correctional "Free Lunch"? Cost Neglect Increases Punishment in Prosecutors.惩教的“免费午餐”?成本忽视增加检察官的量刑
Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 12;12:778293. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.778293. eCollection 2021.
3
Beyond t test and ANOVA: applications of mixed-effects models for more rigorous statistical analysis in neuroscience research.
超越 t 检验和 ANOVA:混合效应模型在神经科学研究中更严格的统计分析中的应用。
Neuron. 2022 Jan 5;110(1):21-35. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2021.10.030. Epub 2021 Nov 15.
4
Punishment is Organized around Principles of Communicative Inference.惩罚是围绕着交际推理原则来组织的。
Cognition. 2021 Mar;208:104544. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104544. Epub 2020 Dec 28.
5
The potential influence of criminological rationales in considering childhood abuse as mitigating to sentencing.从犯罪学角度考虑将虐待儿童作为减刑的因素的潜在影响。
Child Abuse Negl. 2021 Jan;111:104818. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104818. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
6
Amplifying the Noise: The Dangers of Post Hoc Power Analyses.放大噪声:事后功效分析的危险。
J Surg Res. 2021 Mar;259:A9-A11. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.09.075. Epub 2020 Aug 22.
7
Slippery scales: Cost prompts, but not benefit prompts, modulate sentencing recommendations in laypeople.滑溜溜的尺度:成本提示,但不是收益提示,调节了外行人的量刑建议。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 31;15(7):e0236764. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236764. eCollection 2020.
8
CLME: An R Package for Linear Mixed Effects Models under Inequality Constraints.CLME:一个用于不等式约束下线性混合效应模型的R包。
J Stat Softw. 2016;75. doi: 10.18637/jss.v075.i01. Epub 2016 Nov 19.
9
Not so motivated after all? Three replication attempts and a theoretical challenge to a morally motivated belief in free will.终究没那么有动力?三次重复验证尝试以及对出于道德动机的自由意志信念的理论挑战。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2021 Jan;150(1):e1-e12. doi: 10.1037/xge0000788. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
10
The Interpretation of Statistical Power after the Data have been Gathered.数据收集后的统计功效解读
Curr Psychol. 2020 Jun;39(3):870-877. doi: 10.1007/s12144-018-0018-1. Epub 2018 Oct 2.