• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腰骶角是采用半硬性输尿管镜治疗输尿管中段结石的重要预测指标。

The lumbosacral angle is a significant predictor for using a semi-rigid ureteroscopic approach in middle ureteral stones.

作者信息

Ueki Hideto, Inoue Takaaki, Fujita Masaichiro, Yamamichi Fukashi, Fujisawa Masato

机构信息

Department of Urology, Kobe University Hospital, Hyogo, Japan.

Department of Urology and Stone Center, Hara Genitourinary Hospital, Hyogo, Japan.

出版信息

Transl Androl Urol. 2022 Apr;11(4):451-459. doi: 10.21037/tau-21-1043.

DOI:10.21037/tau-21-1043
PMID:35558265
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9085932/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ureteroscopy for middle ureteral stones is often difficult from an anatomical view. This study aimed to evaluate the pelvic anatomy in three dimensions and investigate the relationship between the pelvic anatomy and potential semi-rigid ureteroscopic approach for treating middle ureteral stones.

METHODS

From a total of 967 patients who underwent ureteroscopy from December 2017 to January 2021, 124 patients who had middle ureteral stones were included in this retrospective cohort study. The pelvic transverse diameter, pelvic vertical diameter, pelvic depth, and lumbosacral angle were measured through preoperative non-contrast computed tomography to define the shape of the pelvic cavity. The relationship between the reachability of the middle ureteral stone using a semi-rigid ureteroscope and the aforementioned anatomical factors, as well as treatment outcomes, was examined retrospectively.

RESULTS

The lumbosacral angle and female sex were significant predictors of the possibility of a semi-rigid ureteroscopic approach to middle ureteral stones [odds ratio =1.08; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.03-1.14; P=0.003, and odds ratio =3.23; 95% CI: 1.12-9.32; P=0.03, respectively]. The cutoff value of the lumbosacral angle was 149.9°, with a sensitivity of 55.1% and a specificity of 72.7%. The time to reach the stone was longer in the lumbosacral angle <150° group than in the lumbosacral angle ≥150° group (P=0.049).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, gradual lumbosacral angle and female sex are positive predictors of the reachability of the middle ureteral stone with a semi-rigid ureteroscope.

摘要

背景

从解剖学角度来看,输尿管镜检查治疗中段输尿管结石往往具有挑战性。本研究旨在对骨盆进行三维解剖评估,并探讨骨盆解剖结构与采用半硬性输尿管镜治疗中段输尿管结石的潜在方法之间的关系。

方法

在2017年12月至2021年1月期间接受输尿管镜检查的967例患者中,本回顾性队列研究纳入了124例患有中段输尿管结石的患者。通过术前非增强计算机断层扫描测量骨盆横径、骨盆垂直径、骨盆深度和腰骶角,以确定盆腔形状。回顾性分析半硬性输尿管镜到达中段输尿管结石的可达性与上述解剖因素以及治疗结果之间的关系。

结果

腰骶角和女性是半硬性输尿管镜治疗中段输尿管结石可能性的重要预测因素[优势比分别为1.08;95%置信区间(CI):1.03 - 1.14;P = 0.003,以及优势比为3.23;95% CI:1.12 - 9.32;P = 0.03]。腰骶角的截断值为149.9°,敏感性为55.1%,特异性为72.7%。腰骶角<150°组到达结石的时间比腰骶角≥150°组更长(P = 0.049)。

结论

在本研究中,逐渐增大的腰骶角和女性是使用半硬性输尿管镜到达中段输尿管结石的积极预测因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5f7/9085932/bb03ef5488f4/tau-11-04-451-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5f7/9085932/09ba51c2fc7e/tau-11-04-451-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5f7/9085932/bb03ef5488f4/tau-11-04-451-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5f7/9085932/09ba51c2fc7e/tau-11-04-451-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5f7/9085932/bb03ef5488f4/tau-11-04-451-f2.jpg

相似文献

1
The lumbosacral angle is a significant predictor for using a semi-rigid ureteroscopic approach in middle ureteral stones.腰骶角是采用半硬性输尿管镜治疗输尿管中段结石的重要预测指标。
Transl Androl Urol. 2022 Apr;11(4):451-459. doi: 10.21037/tau-21-1043.
2
Ureteroscopic lithotripsy using holmium laser for 187 patients with proximal ureteral stones.187 例输尿管上段结石行输尿管镜钬激光碎石术。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2012 May;125(9):1542-6.
3
Ureteroscopic lithotripsy in Trendelenburg position for proximal ureteral calculi: a prospective, randomized, comparative study.头低脚高位输尿管镜碎石术治疗近端输尿管结石:一项前瞻性、随机、对照研究。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2014 Oct;46(10):1895-901. doi: 10.1007/s11255-014-0732-z. Epub 2014 May 14.
4
Semi-rigid ureteroscope as a dilator in renal stone ureteroscopic treatment.半硬性输尿管镜作为扩张器在肾结石输尿管镜治疗中的应用。
Can J Urol. 2020 Aug;27(4):10317-10321.
5
[Application of Intermittent Lung Inflation Combined with Rigid Ureteroscopy in Treating Upper Ureteral Stones That Were Not Fully Visible].间歇性肺膨胀联合硬性输尿管镜在治疗不完全可视的上段输尿管结石中的应用
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao. 2019 Dec 30;41(6):793-798. doi: 10.3881/j.issn.1000-503X.11105.
6
Three-dimensional mean stone density on non-contrast computed tomography can predict ureteroscopic lithotripsy outcome in ureteral stone cases.非增强 CT 三维平均结石密度可预测输尿管结石钬激光碎石术的疗效。
Urolithiasis. 2020 Dec;48(6):547-552. doi: 10.1007/s00240-020-01178-7. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
7
[The predictive value of ureteral wall area for impacted ureteral stones].[输尿管壁面积对嵌顿性输尿管结石的预测价值]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2021 Nov 30;101(44):3637-3642. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20210325-00742.
8
Ureteral Wall Thickness as a Preoperative Indicator of Impacted Stones in Patients With Ureteral Stones Undergoing Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy.输尿管壁厚度作为输尿管结石患者行输尿管镜碎石术前结石嵌顿的指标
Urology. 2017 Aug;106:45-49. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.04.047. Epub 2017 May 9.
9
[The use of rigid ureteroscope in the treatment of ureteral steinstrasse after extra corporeal shockwave lithotripsy of renal calculi--case report].[硬性输尿管镜在肾结石体外冲击波碎石术后输尿管石街治疗中的应用——病例报告]
Med Pregl. 2004 Nov-Dec;57(11-12):597-600. doi: 10.2298/mpns0412597d.
10
Semi-rigid ureteroscopy for ureteric and renal pelvic calculi: Predictive factors for complications and success.半硬性输尿管镜治疗输尿管及肾盂结石:并发症及成功的预测因素
Arab J Urol. 2013 Jun;11(2):136-41. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2013.04.008. Epub 2013 Jun 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Complications of ureteroscopy: a complete overview.输尿管镜检查的并发症:全面概述。
World J Urol. 2020 Sep;38(9):2147-2166. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-03012-1. Epub 2019 Nov 20.
2
How Effective Is Retrograde Semirigid and Flexible Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy for the Treatment of Large Ureteral Stones Equal of or Greater than 15 mm? Results from a Single Center.逆行半硬性和软性输尿管镜碎石术治疗直径大于或等于15mm的大型输尿管结石效果如何?单中心研究结果
Urol Int. 2019;103(1):74-80. doi: 10.1159/000499573. Epub 2019 Apr 18.
3
Risks of flexible ureterorenoscopy: pathophysiology and prevention.
软性输尿管镜检查的风险:病理生理学与预防。
Urolithiasis. 2018 Feb;46(1):59-67. doi: 10.1007/s00240-017-1018-6. Epub 2017 Nov 18.
4
Size matters: The width and location of a ureteral stone accurately predict the chance of spontaneous passage.大小很重要:输尿管结石的宽度和位置准确预测了自行排出的机会。
Eur Radiol. 2017 Nov;27(11):4775-4785. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-4852-6. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
5
Impact of overweight and obesity on the musculoskeletal system using lumbosacral angles.使用腰骶角评估超重和肥胖对肌肉骨骼系统的影响。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016 Mar 10;10:291-6. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S90967. eCollection 2016.
6
Semi-rigid ureteroscopy: Proximal versus distal ureteral stones.半硬性输尿管镜检查:输尿管上段结石与下段结石
Urol Ann. 2016 Jan-Mar;8(1):84-6. doi: 10.4103/0974-7796.171495.
7
Is semirigid ureteroscopy sufficient in the treatment of proximal ureteral stones? When is combined therapy with flexible ureteroscopy needed?半硬性输尿管镜检查在治疗近端输尿管结石方面是否足够?何时需要与软性输尿管镜联合治疗?
Springerplus. 2016 Jan 13;5:30. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-1677-8. eCollection 2016.
8
Semi-rigid ureteroscopy for ureteric and renal pelvic calculi: Predictive factors for complications and success.半硬性输尿管镜治疗输尿管及肾盂结石:并发症及成功的预测因素
Arab J Urol. 2013 Jun;11(2):136-41. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2013.04.008. Epub 2013 Jun 2.
9
Differences in ureteroscopic stone treatment and outcomes for distal, mid-, proximal, or multiple ureteral locations: the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society ureteroscopy global study.经输尿管镜碎石术治疗输尿管不同部位(远端、中段、上段或多处)结石的效果比较:经自然腔道内镜协会经输尿管镜全球研究临床研究办公室。
Eur Urol. 2014 Jul;66(1):102-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.01.011. Epub 2014 Jan 23.
10
A multicenter comparison of the safety and effectiveness of ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy in obese and normal weight patients.多中心比较肥胖和正常体重患者输尿管镜激光碎石术的安全性和有效性。
J Endourol. 2013 Jun;27(6):710-4. doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0605.