• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对饮食的社会影响的认知取决于对想象中的用餐伙伴的熟悉程度和用餐场合的类型。

Awareness of Social Influences on Eating Is Dependent on Familiarity With Imagined Dining Partners and Type of Eating Occasion.

作者信息

Higgs Suzanne, Bouguettaya Ayoub, Ruddock Helen

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 26;13:841422. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.841422. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.841422
PMID:35558688
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9087192/
Abstract

When eating with strangers, people tend to eat less than they would when eating alone (social inhibition of eating), whereas they tend to eat more with family and friends (social facilitation of eating). To assess awareness of the social inhibition and facilitation of eating we conducted two online studies (Study 1:N = 481; Study 2:N = 485). In Study 1, participants imagined a dining scenario and indicated whether they would eat the same, more, or less when eating with someone who was more or less familiar to them (friend; family member; acquaintance; stranger) compared with when eating alone. Results from Study 1 indicated that participants imagined eating special meals with friends/family and so, in Study 2, another group of participants made the same predictions as for Study 1, but they did so for special and regular meals. In Study 1, a significant majority of participants said that they would "eat less" with a stranger/acquaintance. A similar proportion of participants said that they would "eat the same" or "eat more" when with a friend/family member and significantly fewer participants said that they would "eat less" with a friend/family member. In Study 2, the majority of participants said that they would "eat less" with a stranger across both special and regular meals. For meals with an acquaintance, the majority of participants reported that they would "eat the same" during regular meals, while for special meals, equal numbers said that they would "eat the same" as would "eat less." The majority of participants indicated that they would "eat more" during a special meal with a friend/family member. However, for regular meals with a friend/family member, a significant majority of participants said that they would "eat the same." Hence, participants acknowledge the social inhibition of intake and the social facilitation of eating at special meals, but they are either unwilling or unable to acknowledge that they would eat more with a friend/family member at a regular meal compared with eating alone. Raising awareness that eating with friends/family is associated with greater intake at regular meals may be helpful for individuals who are trying to manage their intake.

摘要

与陌生人一起用餐时,人们往往比独自用餐时吃得少(饮食的社会抑制),而与家人和朋友一起用餐时,人们往往吃得更多(饮食的社会促进)。为了评估对饮食的社会抑制和促进的意识,我们进行了两项在线研究(研究1:N = 481;研究2:N = 485)。在研究1中,参与者想象一个用餐场景,并指出与独自用餐相比,当与他们或多或少熟悉的人(朋友;家庭成员;熟人;陌生人)一起用餐时,他们会吃得一样多、更多还是更少。研究1的结果表明,参与者想象与朋友/家人一起吃特别的饭菜,因此,在研究2中,另一组参与者做出了与研究1相同的预测,但他们是针对特别饭菜和普通饭菜进行预测的。在研究1中,绝大多数参与者表示,与陌生人/熟人一起用餐时他们会“吃得更少”。相似比例的参与者表示,与朋友/家庭成员一起用餐时他们会“吃得一样多”或“吃得更多”,而表示与朋友/家庭成员一起用餐时会“吃得更少”的参与者明显更少。在研究2中,大多数参与者表示,无论是特别饭菜还是普通饭菜,与陌生人一起用餐时他们都会“吃得更少”。对于与熟人一起用餐,大多数参与者报告说,在普通饭菜期间他们会“吃得一样多”,而对于特别饭菜,说会“吃得一样多”和“吃得更少”的人数相等。大多数参与者表示,与朋友/家庭成员一起吃特别饭菜时他们会“吃得更多”。然而,对于与朋友/家庭成员一起吃普通饭菜,绝大多数参与者表示他们会“吃得一样多”。因此,参与者承认在特别饭菜时有饮食的社会抑制和饮食的社会促进,但他们要么不愿意要么无法承认与独自用餐相比,与朋友/家庭成员一起吃普通饭菜时他们会吃得更多。提高对与朋友/家人一起用餐与普通饭菜时摄入量增加相关的认识,可能对试图控制摄入量的人有所帮助。

相似文献

1
Awareness of Social Influences on Eating Is Dependent on Familiarity With Imagined Dining Partners and Type of Eating Occasion.对饮食的社会影响的认知取决于对想象中的用餐伙伴的熟悉程度和用餐场合的类型。
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 26;13:841422. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.841422. eCollection 2022.
2
Social facilitation of energy intake in adult women is sustained over three days in a crossover laboratory experiment and is not compensated for under free-living conditions.交叉实验室实验中,成年女性的能量摄入会受到社会促进作用的影响,这种影响可持续三天,并且在自由生活条件下不会得到补偿。
Appetite. 2022 Sep 1;176:106141. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2022.106141. Epub 2022 Jun 17.
3
People's intended serving behaviour at social vs. non-social meals.人们在社交聚餐与非社交聚餐时的预期用餐行为。
Appetite. 2022 Aug 1;175:106053. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2022.106053. Epub 2022 Apr 20.
4
People serve themselves larger portions before a social meal.人们在社交餐之前会给自己盛更大份量的食物。
Sci Rep. 2021 May 26;11(1):11072. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-90559-y.
5
Social facilitation of eating among friends and strangers.朋友和陌生人之间进食的社会促进作用。
Appetite. 1994 Aug;23(1):1-13. doi: 10.1006/appe.1994.1030.
6
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the social facilitation of eating.进食社会促进作用的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2019 Oct 1;110(4):842-861. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqz155.
7
Social modelling of food intake. The role of familiarity of the dining partners and food type.食物摄入的社会模型。用餐伙伴的熟悉程度和食物类型的作用。
Appetite. 2015 Mar;86:19-24. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.09.020. Epub 2014 Oct 13.
8
The role of perceived descriptive and injunctive norms on the self-reported frequency of meat and plant-based meal intake in UK-based adults.感知描述性规范和指令性规范对英国成年人自我报告的肉类和植物性膳食摄入频率的影响。
Appetite. 2021 Dec 1;167:105615. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105615. Epub 2021 Jul 28.
9
Intergenerational transmission of family meal patterns from adolescence to parenthood: longitudinal associations with parents' dietary intake, weight-related behaviours and psychosocial well-being.代际传递:青少年到为人父母阶段家庭用餐模式的变化及其与父母饮食摄入、体重相关行为和心理健康的纵向关联。
Public Health Nutr. 2018 Feb;21(2):299-308. doi: 10.1017/S1368980017002270. Epub 2017 Oct 17.
10
Effect of Longer Family Meals on Children's Fruit and Vegetable Intake: A Randomized Clinical Trial.更长时间家庭用餐对儿童水果和蔬菜摄入量的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Apr 3;6(4):e236331. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.6331.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring Determinants of Adherence to the Mediterranean Diet Among Adults in Lebanon During the Economic Crisis: A Qualitative Study.探索黎巴嫩经济危机期间成年人坚持地中海饮食的决定因素:一项定性研究。
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2025 Apr;38(2):e70053. doi: 10.1111/jhn.70053.

本文引用的文献

1
The social facilitation of eating: why does the mere presence of others cause an increase in energy intake?进食的社会促进作用:为什么仅仅是他人的存在就会导致能量摄入增加?
Physiol Behav. 2021 Oct 15;240:113539. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2021.113539. Epub 2021 Jul 28.
2
People serve themselves larger portions before a social meal.人们在社交餐之前会给自己盛更大份量的食物。
Sci Rep. 2021 May 26;11(1):11072. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-90559-y.
3
Computational Commensality: From Theories to Computational Models for Social Food Preparation and Consumption in HCI.计算共生性:从理论到人机交互中社会食物制备与消费的计算模型
Front Robot AI. 2019 Dec 5;6:119. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2019.00119. eCollection 2019.
4
What does it mean to overeat?暴饮暴食是什么意思?
Eat Behav. 2020 Apr;37:101390. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2020.101390. Epub 2020 May 3.
5
Digital Commensality: Eating and Drinking in the Company of Technology.数字共生:与科技相伴的饮食
Front Psychol. 2019 Oct 9;10:2252. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02252. eCollection 2019.
6
Challenges, Opportunities, and Motivators for Developing and Applying Food Literacy in a University Setting: A Qualitative Study.在大学环境中发展和应用食品素养的挑战、机遇和激励因素:一项定性研究。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2020 Jan;120(1):33-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2019.06.003. Epub 2019 Sep 16.
7
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the social facilitation of eating.进食社会促进作用的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2019 Oct 1;110(4):842-861. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqz155.
8
Hunger, taste, and normative cues in predictions about food intake.饥饿、味觉与规范性线索对食物摄入量预测的影响。
Appetite. 2017 Sep 1;116:511-517. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.05.044. Epub 2017 May 28.
9
Self-reported overeating and attributions for food intake.自我报告的暴饮暴食及食物摄入的归因
Psychol Health. 2017 Apr;32(4):483-492. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2017.1283040. Epub 2017 Jan 30.
10
Conflicting internal and external eating cues: Impact on food intake and attributions.相互冲突的内在和外在饮食线索:对食物摄入量和归因的影响。
Health Psychol. 2017 Apr;36(4):365-369. doi: 10.1037/hea0000447. Epub 2016 Oct 17.