Yang Yipeng, Wang Yu, Cao Junming, Lei Tao, Yang Zongyou, Xia Hehuan
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University Shijiazhuang 050035, Hebei Province, China.
Am J Transl Res. 2022 Apr 15;14(4):2419-2427. eCollection 2022.
OBJECTIVE: To explore the effect of open-door laminoplasty and simultaneous C2 semi-laminectomy with lateral mass screw fixation (LSLF) in treating ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) in cervical discs at C2 segment. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 76 patients diagnosed with OPLL in cervical discs at C2 segment from November 2016 to May 2019 were included. These patients were assigned into a LSLF group (n=41, LSLF surgery) and LF group (n=35, laminectomy and lateral mass screw fixation) according to the treatment they received. The surgery time and intraoperative blood loss were recorded. Improvements in neurological function (JOA score), cervical curvature index (CCI), spinal cord drift distance, cross-sectional area (CSA) of the posterior muscles from cervical spine, occurrence of C5 palsy, and severity of axial symptoms were evaluated between LSLF group and LF group. RESULTS: Compared with LF group, the operative time was longer and blood loss volume was higher in LSLF group (P<0.05). No statistical difference was found in decompression width between LSLF group and LF group, while the drift distance of spinal cord in LSLF group was larger than that in LF group (P<0.05). No obvious differences were observed in anteroposterior dural sac diameter after the surgery between LSLF group and LF group. CSA in LF group decreased more than that in LSLF group (P<0.05). No remarkable difference was obtained in CCI at the final follow-up between LSLF group and LF group. The NDI score after surgery in the LSLF group was significantly decreased compared to LF group (P<0.05), while no differences were observed in JOA scores or the neurological recovery rate between LSLF group and LF group. The occurrence of C5 palsy in the LSLF group was 4.9%, which was less than that of LF group (20.0%). In contrast to LF group, postoperative axial symptoms in LSLF group were decreased (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Compared to LF, LSLF could better improve neck functions, and reduce the severity of axial symptoms and the occurrence of C5 palsy for patients with OPLL at C2 segment.
目的:探讨单开门椎管扩大成形术联合C2半椎板切除术及侧块螺钉固定术(LSLF)治疗C2节段颈椎后纵韧带骨化症(OPLL)的效果。 方法:本回顾性研究纳入了2016年11月至2019年5月期间诊断为C2节段颈椎OPLL的76例患者。根据所接受的治疗方法,将这些患者分为LSLF组(n = 41,LSLF手术)和LF组(n = 35,椎板切除术及侧块螺钉固定术)。记录手术时间和术中出血量。评估LSLF组和LF组之间神经功能(JOA评分)、颈椎曲度指数(CCI)、脊髓漂移距离、颈椎后肌横截面积(CSA)、C5麻痹的发生率以及轴性症状的严重程度。 结果:与LF组相比,LSLF组手术时间更长,出血量更多(P < 0.05)。LSLF组和LF组之间减压宽度无统计学差异,而LSLF组脊髓漂移距离大于LF组(P < 0.05)。LSLF组和LF组术后硬脊膜囊前后径无明显差异。LF组CSA下降幅度大于LSLF组(P < 0.05)。LSLF组和LF组末次随访时CCI无显著差异。LSLF组术后NDI评分较LF组显著降低(P < 0.05),而LSLF组和LF组之间JOA评分或神经恢复率无差异。LSLF组C5麻痹发生率为4.9%,低于LF组(20.0%)。与LF组相比,LSLF组术后轴性症状减轻(P < 0.05)。 结论:与LF相比,LSLF能更好地改善C2节段OPLL患者的颈部功能,减轻轴性症状的严重程度并降低C5麻痹的发生率。
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013-10
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2023-6-15
J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2022-3
J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2021-3
Int Orthop. 2018-8-16