Department of Orthopaedics, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Department of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Spine J. 2020 Sep;20(9):1403-1412. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.04.023. Epub 2020 May 6.
Open-door laminoplasty often results in postoperative complications such as loss of cervical lordosis, limitations of cervical motion, and axial symptoms. However, current modified laminoplasty techniques such as muscle-sparing type or spinous process splitting technique are not as effective as expected.
To evaluate the radiological and clinical outcomes of C3 laminectomy combined with modified unilateral laminoplasty (preservation of posterior muscle-ligament complex and reconstruction of the midline structures) versus traditional open door laminoplasty in treating cervical spondylotic myelopathy or ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.
Retrospective case-control study.
One hundred and eleven patients with multilevel cord compression and myelopathic symptoms.
The outcome parameters were operation time, blood loss volume, complications, osseous fusion status, C0-C2 and C2-C7 Cobb angles, T1 slope, cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA), cervical curvature index (CCI), range of motion (ROM), cross-sectional area (CSA) of the semispinalis cervicis, axial symptoms, visual analog scale (VAS) score, Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, and neck disability index (NDI).
We matched 37 patients who underwent modified laminoplasty with 74 patients treated by traditional open door laminoplasty (ratio, 1:2) according to age, sex, body mass index, compromised level, and radiographic characteristics. Preoperative and postoperative cervical parameters, namely, the C2-C7 Cobb angle, ROM, and CCI were measured on X-ray films. The CSA of the semispinalis cervicis was assessed on magnetic resonance images, and osseous fusion status of the hinge side and the osteotomy site was evaluated by computed tomography. We used the JOA and VAS scores, and the NDI to evaluate clinical outcomes.
The average follow-up period in the modified group was 24.1 months (range, 18-37 months) compared with 24.7 months (range, 18-38 months) in the control group. At the final follow-up, C0-C2 Cobb angle, T1 slope, and cSVA increased in the control group and were unchanged in the modified group. The C2-C7 Cobb angle decreased significantly in the control group and did not change in the modified group. ROM and CCI loss rate did not change in the modified group but decreased significantly in the control group. The CSA loss in the semispinalis cervicis was 222.90±79.56 mm in the control group and 49.11±75.93 mm in the modified group, with a significant difference (p<.001). The final CSA of the semispinalis cervicis at C2 and C4-C7 levels showed no significant difference in the modified group and decreased significantly in the control group compared with preoperation. Changes in the C2-C7 Cobb angle and cSVA were both correlated with the CSA loss of the semispinalis cervicis (r=0.282, p=.003; r=0.267, p=.005, respectively). Moreover, the CSA loss of the semispinalis cervicis also correlated with the CCI loss rate and the changes in ROM (r=0.312, p=.001; r=0.287, p=.002, respectively). Clinical outcomes such as VAS and NDI scores, improved significantly more in the modified group versus the controls (p<.001 and p=.005, respectively), while JOA scores improved similarly in both groups (p=.132). The incidence of axial symptoms was significantly lower in the modified group versus controls (5.4% vs 9.5%, respectively; p=.023).
C3 laminectomy combined with modified unilateral laminoplasty is effective for treating patients with multilevel cord compression. This modified technique reconstructs the midline structures and may lead to improved alignment and less axial pain.
开门式椎板切除术常导致术后并发症,如颈椎前凸丢失、颈椎活动度受限和轴向症状。然而,目前的改良椎板切除术技术,如保留肌肉韧带复合体的肌肉节约型或棘突劈开技术,效果并不如预期。
评估 C3 椎板切除术联合改良单侧椎板切除术(保留后肌-韧带复合体和重建中线结构)与传统开门式椎板切除术治疗多节段脊髓压迫和脊髓病症状的颈椎后纵韧带骨化的影像学和临床结果。
回顾性病例对照研究。
111 例多节段脊髓压迫和脊髓病症状患者。
手术时间、失血量、并发症、骨融合状态、C0-C2 和 C2-C7 Cobb 角、T1 斜率、颈椎矢状垂直轴(cSVA)、颈椎曲率指数(CCI)、活动度(ROM)、半棘肌横截面积(CSA)、轴向症状、视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、日本骨科协会(JOA)评分和颈部残疾指数(NDI)。
根据年龄、性别、体重指数、受损水平和影像学特征,我们将 37 例接受改良椎板切除术的患者与 74 例接受传统开门式椎板切除术的患者(比例为 1:2)进行匹配。在 X 线片上测量颈椎的 C2-C7 Cobb 角、ROM 和 CCI。通过磁共振成像评估半棘肌的 CSA,通过计算机断层扫描评估铰链侧和截骨部位的骨融合状态。我们使用 JOA 和 VAS 评分以及 NDI 来评估临床结果。
改良组的平均随访时间为 24.1 个月(范围,18-37 个月),对照组为 24.7 个月(范围,18-38 个月)。在最终随访时,对照组的 C0-C2 Cobb 角、T1 斜率和 cSVA 增加,而改良组则保持不变。对照组的 C2-C7 Cobb 角显著下降,而改良组则保持不变。改良组的 ROM 和 CCI 损失率没有变化,而对照组则显著下降。半棘肌的 CSA 损失在对照组为 222.90±79.56mm,在改良组为 49.11±75.93mm,差异有统计学意义(p<.001)。改良组 C2 和 C4-C7 水平的半棘肌终末 CSA 与术前相比无显著差异,而对照组则显著下降。C2-C7 Cobb 角和 cSVA 的变化与半棘肌 CSA 的损失均相关(r=0.282,p=.003;r=0.267,p=.005)。此外,半棘肌 CSA 的损失与 CCI 损失率和 ROM 变化也相关(r=0.312,p=.001;r=0.287,p=.002)。改良组的 VAS 和 NDI 评分改善明显优于对照组(p<.001 和 p=.005),而 JOA 评分两组改善相似(p=.132)。改良组的轴向症状发生率明显低于对照组(5.4%比 9.5%,p=.023)。
C3 椎板切除术联合改良单侧椎板切除术治疗多节段脊髓压迫有效。这种改良技术重建了中线结构,可能导致更好的排列和更少的轴向疼痛。